The AMD Ryzen 9 7900, Ryzen 7 7700, and Ryzen 5 7600 Review: Zen 4 Efficiency at 65 Watts
by Gavin Bonshor on January 9, 2023 9:00 AM ESTGaming Performance: 1440p
In our Ryzen 7000 series review, we saw users commenting about testing games for CPU reviews at 1440p, so we have duly obliged here. Those interested in 1440p performance with minimal image quality – particularly the esports crowd – will be glad to know that we will be testing at this resolution going forward into 2023 and beyond.
We are using DDR5 memory on the Ryzen 7000 series 65 W SKUs, as well as the other Ryzen 7000 processors tested, at the following settings:
- DDR5-5600B CL46 - Intel 13th Gen
- DDR5-5200 CL44 - Ryzen 7000
- DDR5-4800 (B) CL40 - Intel 12th Gen
All other CPUs such as Ryzen 5000 and 3000 were tested at the relevant JEDEC settings as per the processor's individual memory support with DDR4.
Civilization VI
Borderlands 3
Grand Theft Auto V
Red Dead Redemption 2
F1 2022
Hitman 3
Total War: Warhammer 3
We noticed some discrepancies in our Cyberpunk 2077 testing at 1440p and 4K; we will publish these results once we identify the issue. We plan to re-test the affected CPUs over the coming week and will update this review with the aforementioned graphs when/if we can resolve the issue.
Focusing on the rest of our results at 1440p, and with our AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT doing most of the grunt work, the Ryzen 7000 65 W series processors performed very well; without much variation between the rest of the chips on test, meaning that we have hit a bottleneck.
This means that users looking to pair the Ryzen 9 7900, Ryzen 7 7700, and Ryzen 5 7600 processors with a high-performance GPU can viably game at 1440p, as gaming at this resolution is more dependent on graphical power than CPU power.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
55 Comments
View All Comments
Zucker2k - Wednesday, January 11, 2023 - link
https://www.anandtech.com/show/17418/amd-corrects-...65x1.35 =87.75ppt
105x1.35=141.75ppt
120x1.35=162ppt
125x1.35=168.75ppt
170x1.35=229.5ppt
juhatus - Monday, January 9, 2023 - link
"Looking at the Ryzen 9 7900, it marginally beats out the Ryzen 9 _7950X_ and sits" - Typo, should be 5950X, above borderlands 3 test on conclusion page.Gavin Bonshor - Monday, January 9, 2023 - link
Thank you for spotting that!MadAd - Monday, January 9, 2023 - link
Did I miss the single core performance test?djsvetljo - Monday, January 9, 2023 - link
I am concerned about Zen4 minimum power draw (idle). Judging by graphs on page 2, it seems like CPU consumes 20 watt on idle???Going back to the Zen4 X comparison vs 13th gen, Intel seems to have advantage at idle. Planning to update home server that sits on idle or very low load 80% of the day, but needs to be on 24/7. I eventually am planing to run VMs on it (rare gaming with GPU pass thru). Thoughts?
duploxxx - Tuesday, January 10, 2023 - link
thoughts? you are creating a wacko system. one site you want to have low low idle, and than intel is better although the latest generation is less difference... its not the cpu, its the total package with pci-e5 etc that is upping the idle power. on the other side you want GPU power which eats already 50% of your total idle power. so the diff between intel and amd will now be only way less vs total idle.. on top for VM you should have an AMD multicore for sure. my advise? wait for the 7000 APU it might fit both your needs.kpb321 - Monday, January 9, 2023 - link
Is it just me or do the 7600x and 7700x just seem like bad deals compared to the newly released chips. $30 moves you up to the 7700 or 7900 respectively with the same rated boost clocks for ST task. Lower base clocks will hurt but the additional cores will help compensate in most MT situations. The 7700 beats the 7600x in many of the multi-threaded tests and does it for a small premium and while using a lot less power in the process.steveofwa - Monday, January 9, 2023 - link
Seems like there is no reason for the "x" versions to exist. They can have their non X with good power efficiency, and the x3d for performance.Byte - Tuesday, January 10, 2023 - link
X is now the "founders" edition where rather than get discounts like kickstarter, you pay for the privilege for getting it first. Nvidia did this with the 2080Ti FE being $1200 whereas msrp was $999. They saw it work well so everyone taking a page. Ryzen traditionally launched with non-X and that was the go to. The X is mostly for emotional reasons which plays a bigger factor in marketing than you think. Most people will never lower themselves to a x700 series card for instance. That is why nvidia did two 4080s in the beginning but backtracked. Wrong move.AndrewJacksonZA - Monday, January 9, 2023 - link
Hi. For "(3-3) Dolphin 5.0 Render Test" you have the test results in your Bench different to the test results in the graph.In the graph:
Intel Core i9-12900KS = 182.2
In your Bench:
Intel Core i9-12900KS with DDR5 = 169
Intel Core i9-12900K with DDR4 = 181
Also, according to your Bench, for "(3-4c) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 20K Hybrid," the i3-12300 with a score of 72 beats *ALL* the new Ryzen 7xxx CPUs. Can you confirm that please?
I haven't checked any of the other results to your bench but suspect that more might also be different. Also, are efforts underway to update the Bench to include these results, please?
Thank you