CPU Benchmark Performance: Science

Our Science section covers all the tests that typically resemble more scientific-based workloads and instruction sets. For our 2023 CPU suite, we've also added SciMark 2.0 which measures numerical kernels and various computational routines found in numeric coding.

We are using DDR5 memory on the Core i9-13900K, the Core i5-13600K, the Ryzen 9 7950X, and Ryzen 5 7600X, as well as Intel's 12th Gen (Alder Lake) processors at the following settings:

  • DDR5-5600B CL46 - Intel 13th Gen
  • DDR5-5200 CL44 - Ryzen 7000
  • DDR5-4800 (B) CL40 - Intel 12th Gen

All other CPUs such as Ryzen 5000 and 3000 were tested at the relevant JEDEC settings as per the processor's individual memory support with DDR4.

Science

(2-1) 3D Particle Movement v2.1 (non-AVX)

(2-2) 3D Particle Movement v2.1 (Peak AVX)

(2-3) yCruncher 0.78.9506 ST (250m Pi)

(2-4) yCruncher 0.78.9506 MT (2.5b Pi)

(2-4b) yCruncher 0.78.9506 MT (250m Pi)(2-5) SciMark 2.0: Composite

(2-5b) SciMark 2.0: Monte Carlo

(2-5c) SciMark 2.0: Fast Fourier Transform

(2-5c) SciMark 2.0: Fast Fourier Transform

(2-5d) SciMark 2.0: Sparse Matrix Multiply

(2-5e) SciMark 2.0: Dense LU Matrix Factorization

(2-5f) SciMark 2.0: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation

Outside of the 3DPM 2.1 AVX test (only Ryzen 7000 has AVX-512 enabled), the rest of the results are conclusive, the Core i9-13900K is very good as it dominates things in our SciMark 2.0 tests. 

It is worth noting that in both 3DPM 2.1 (non-AVX) and in yCruncher, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is the clear winner in that battle, but even the Core i5-13600K does well against the previous Intel 12th Generation chips.

CPU Benchmark Performance: Power, Office And Web CPU Benchmark Performance: Simulation
POST A COMMENT

169 Comments

View All Comments

  • kwohlt - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    I'm sure they're at least part of the reason why RPL has much lower idle power draw than Zen4, but their real purpose is to provide 4 threads for the same die area and power draw as a P core to scale MT workloads. Reply
  • Ryan Smith - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    Bingo. They're for area efficiency reasons, not power efficiency reasons. Reply
  • tipoo - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    The X3D continues to impress in many areas doesn't it Reply
  • meacupla - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    It's going to be a slaughter when 7000X3D series comes out... Reply
  • nandnandnand - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    The wins/ties/near-losses for Zen 4 and 5800X3D show the way. 7800X3D will come in like a wrecking ball. Reply
  • brucethemoose - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    Typo at the bottom of page one: "Ryzen 5 7600K" Reply
  • TimSyd - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    Pricing is wrong. Like many AT are quoting Intel's 1000unit tray prices as the MSRPs. Tray prices are not the retail prices.
    NewEgg shows the retail price for the 13900k as US$659
    Reply
  • Mr Perfect - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    MSRP is just suggested retail price, it's not enforced. In this instance Newegg appears to be pricegouging, as a boxed retail i9-13900K can be bought at the $569 price from other retailers, like Microcenter. Reply
  • nandnandnand - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    Intel did NOT provide MSRPs for Raptor Lake:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raptor_Lake#Raptor_L...

    "Price reflects Recommended Customer Price (RCP) rather than MSRP. RCP is the cost per unit, in bulk sales of 1000 units or more, to OEMs, ODMs, and retail outlets when purchasing from Intel. Actual MSRP is higher than RCP"
    Reply
  • bji - Friday, October 21, 2022 - link

    Microcenter is not a comparable retailer, ever. They only sell at those prices to local markets. You might as well compare prices of Amazon to that of Crazy Eddie's CPU Barn that sells only in one neighborhood of St. Louis. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now