CPU Benchmark Performance: Simulation

Simulation and Science have a lot of overlap in the benchmarking world. The benchmarks that fall under Science have a distinct use for the data they output – in our Simulation section, these act more like synthetics but at some level are still trying to simulate a given environment.

In the encrypt/decrypt scenario, how data is transferred and by what mechanism is pertinent to on-the-fly encryption of sensitive data - a process by which more modern devices are leaning to for software security.

We are using DDR5 memory on the Core i9-13900K, the Core i5-13600K, the Ryzen 9 7950X, and Ryzen 5 7600X, as well as Intel's 12th Gen (Alder Lake) processors at the following settings:

  • DDR5-5600B CL46 - Intel 13th Gen
  • DDR5-5200 CL44 - Ryzen 7000
  • DDR5-4800 (B) CL40 - Intel 12th Gen

All other CPUs such as Ryzen 5000 and 3000 were tested at the relevant JEDEC settings as per the processor's individual memory support with DDR4.

Simulation

(3-1) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 65x65, 250 Yr

(3-1b) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 129x129, 550 Yr

(3-1c) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 257x257, 550 Yr

(3-2) Dolphin 5.0 Render Test

(3-3) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 10K Trains

(3-3b) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 10K Belts

(3-3c) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 20K Hybrid

(3-4) John The Ripper 1.9.0: Blowfish

(3-4b) John The Ripper 1.9.0: MD5

Outside of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D's dominance in our Factorio testing, the rest of the results paint an interesting picture; the Core i9-13900K excels in simulations. Whether that's the addition of eight more efficiency cores over the Core i9-12900K, or that it's also partly due to increased core clock speeds, if it works, it works. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is also a solid contender, however, and it tears the competition a new one in our new John the Ripper MD5 test.

CPU Benchmark Performance: Science CPU Benchmark Performance: Rendering And Encoding
Comments Locked

169 Comments

View All Comments

  • brucethemoose - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    x264 is (more or less) the same thing as the handbrake test... and it kinda is legacy software at this point.

    Personally, I'd like to see a more modern encoding test, like av1an with x265+chunked encoding, or maybe Staxrip with some filters enabled.
  • GeoffreyA - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    Yes, some libaom would be fantastic.
  • jakky567 - Monday, October 24, 2022 - link

    I wouldn't say handbrake/x264 are obsolete yet. We should be looking towards the future, but h264 is here to stay as at least a fallback codec.
  • GeoffreyA - Tuesday, October 25, 2022 - link

    It is very much the MP3 of video and here to stay. Plus, its successors have not been indisputably better or have come with tradeoffs.
  • Ashantus - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    Comparing the performance of 7600X vs 13600k i see some overall advantage for the 13600K.
    But, i will defionitly go for the 7600X due one argue.
    Load Consumption of 134 Watt vs 238 Watt at almost same performance is something.
    Regarding the poweer costs in europe of 60 cent per Watt that is quiet some pricing argue at a 5 years lifetime.

    At anandtech:
    this argue should be mentioned in your closing thoughts. 100 Watt more powerconsumption at todays powerprices is a serious issue.
  • Yojimbo - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    I don't remember seeing power versus performance numbers. Did I miss them?
  • CiccioB - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    <blockquote>Load Consumption of 134 Watt vs 238 Watt at almost same performance is something.</blockquote>
    This thought is completely wrong. It is called "induction", as you were looking at something and then reported that on something else.
    You see a graph of power consumption for a "unlimited test" (where performance is not measured) and then you think that that measure is valid also for other tests.
    So you just think that for each bench those CPUs consume always those Watts (how can it be?) and that the performance are the same (where did you got that? In almost all benches the 13600K leaves the 7600X in the dust, but not knowing their power consumption for those test you cannot say which is the most efficient).
  • Ashantus - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    Just found another test, whereas a powerconsumption at action is recorded.

    At gaming (average out of 12 games tested) is:
    13600k = 88 W. 7600X = 60 W
    13990K = 144 W 7900X = 107W
  • Yojimbo - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    that looks more plausible. but it is also mostly useless except in the context of the specific workload. modern cpu performance testing is very complicated and performance versus power should be taken in the specific workload one is interested in, or at the very least an average of workloads of a similar type.
  • Gastec - Sunday, October 23, 2022 - link

    Specific workload such as : 13990K produces 100 fps @ 144 W, while 7600X produces 100 fps @ 60 W?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now