CPU Benchmark Performance: Science

Our Science section covers all the tests that typically resemble more scientific-based workloads and instruction sets. For our 2023 CPU suite, we've also added SciMark 2.0 which measures numerical kernels and various computational routines found in numeric coding.

We are using DDR5 memory on the Core i9-13900K, the Core i5-13600K, the Ryzen 9 7950X, and Ryzen 5 7600X, as well as Intel's 12th Gen (Alder Lake) processors at the following settings:

  • DDR5-5600B CL46 - Intel 13th Gen
  • DDR5-5200 CL44 - Ryzen 7000
  • DDR5-4800 (B) CL40 - Intel 12th Gen

All other CPUs such as Ryzen 5000 and 3000 were tested at the relevant JEDEC settings as per the processor's individual memory support with DDR4.

Science

(2-1) 3D Particle Movement v2.1 (non-AVX)

(2-2) 3D Particle Movement v2.1 (Peak AVX)

(2-3) yCruncher 0.78.9506 ST (250m Pi)

(2-4) yCruncher 0.78.9506 MT (2.5b Pi)

(2-4b) yCruncher 0.78.9506 MT (250m Pi)(2-5) SciMark 2.0: Composite

(2-5b) SciMark 2.0: Monte Carlo

(2-5c) SciMark 2.0: Fast Fourier Transform

(2-5c) SciMark 2.0: Fast Fourier Transform

(2-5d) SciMark 2.0: Sparse Matrix Multiply

(2-5e) SciMark 2.0: Dense LU Matrix Factorization

(2-5f) SciMark 2.0: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation

Outside of the 3DPM 2.1 AVX test (only Ryzen 7000 has AVX-512 enabled), the rest of the results are conclusive, the Core i9-13900K is very good as it dominates things in our SciMark 2.0 tests. 

It is worth noting that in both 3DPM 2.1 (non-AVX) and in yCruncher, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is the clear winner in that battle, but even the Core i5-13600K does well against the previous Intel 12th Generation chips.

CPU Benchmark Performance: Power, Office And Web CPU Benchmark Performance: Simulation
POST A COMMENT

169 Comments

View All Comments

  • blppt - Monday, October 24, 2022 - link

    Wow, what is going on with Civ 5 and Intel 12/13 series CPUs? They get absolutely wrecked. Reply
  • shoestring - Tuesday, October 25, 2022 - link

    "...eeking out every last bit of performance" +1 for word choice, -1 for the spelling: it's actually "eking", which looks weird to me too! https://www.dictionary.com/browse/eke Reply
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, October 25, 2022 - link

    You are correct. The article has been fixed.

    I humbly accept my deduction in points. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.
    Reply
  • OreoCookie - Tuesday, October 25, 2022 - link

    I am surprised Gavin did not include the cooler and perhaps beefier power supply in the price comparison: clearly, if you get an Intel system, you need a *much* bigger cooler, especially if you care about noise. And you might need a bigger power supply, especially if you plan on getting an nVidia 4000-series card. Reply
  • nader_21007 - Wednesday, November 2, 2022 - link

    THX for the review.
    It should be mentioned that INTEL's 13900K is nowhere near the MSRP of $589, I expect the writer to check the real prices, it's price is $795, about $100 more than AMD's ryzen 7950X.
    AMD CPU's are cheaper. it's FACT.
    Reply
  • SanX - Wednesday, November 9, 2022 - link

    I do not need your bs E cores in desktop, Intel Reply
  • Santoval - Tuesday, November 22, 2022 - link

    I wonder if the 5.8 GHz turbo is going to last more than 1 nanosecond at a time. Reply
  • VVTF - Tuesday, October 17, 2023 - link

    The sad thing is, I find this Alder Lake-N review for Nuc Boxes on Anadtech much more interesting:
    https://www.anandtech.com/show/21085/asrock-indust...
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now