Shuttle SN25P

SN25P Flashback

Normally, we proceed in alphabetical order. The reason we're putting the SN25P first is because we've already given it a thorough review and it is the reigning champion of socket 939. We've had more time with it, and some new developments have occurred since the initial making that it is worthwhile to take another look at the SN25P. While it originally earned our Silver Editor's Choice award, the question now is how it stands up to the new contenders.

You'll want to read the earlier review first if you haven't already, as we're not going to do a full review here. We're not including any images either, as nothing has changed other than a few BIOS screens. What we want to discuss are a few updated product launches and how they affect the SN25P. For those of you who want a condensed version, the SN25P is still a very good product and for many people, we continue to recommend it without hesitation. If you've already purchased one and you're running it, there's no real reason to be concerned as performance is very good.

Performance and Overclocking

Since our initial review, some aspects of performance have become slightly better with newer BIOS revisions. Overclocking in particular has improved quite a bit, and we can now confirm that the SN25P runs very well with all socket 939 processors up through the Venice and San Diego cores. In fact, we were able to take a Venice core up to the maximum 300 MHz bus and a 9X multiplier, which comes out as the top overclock for this group of systems. We also had a Venice 3200+ running stably at 2.7 GHz, which is a 35% CPU overclock and better than what we've reached with the same chip on desktop motherboards. Clearly, the cooling solution of the SN25P is up to the task of keeping even the fastest processors within the spec limits.

While we've said that some aspects have improved, we did notice a drop in performance in other areas. If you compare the results published in this article with those of the initial SN25P review, you will find that the scores are not the same. Some benchmarks were a bit faster, and others were a bit lower. In tweaking the BIOS for improved stability and overclocking as well as adding support for X2 processors, Shuttle may have been forced to slow other areas down a bit. Whatever the case, while the latest BIOS appears to be slightly slower, the difference is generally less than a few percent, and the additional features make the BIOS update worthwhile for most users.

Another addition to the BIOS that some people will really like: you can now set the LED brightness level for the front panel from "Off" to "100%" in increments of 12.5%. Those who dislike lights on the front of PC cases - particularly in HTPC configurations - will almost certainly approve of the change. This BIOS setting may have been present before, but it didn't work right. It does now, and the results can be seen in real time - no reboot required. It's the little things that count sometimes.

Processor Support

What about the latest cores, the Toledo and Manchester Athlon 64 X2? That's where we run into some issues. We are currently running all of the units in this roundup through additional tests, focusing on support for the Athlon X2 processors as well as the Venice and San Diego Athlon 64 parts. We'll have full details in the next few weeks, but for now, we can only state that there have been several reports of incompatibilities with the X2 chips and the currently shipping SN25P. They work for the most part, but high traffic loads on the USB2.0 ports appear to "hard" lock the system for many people, and other applications may have problems as well. We've talked with Shuttle about these problems, and they are working to find a solution. Hopefully, by the time we finish our investigations into X2 and 90nm Athlon 64 support, Shuttle will have an updated BIOS that will address the problems.

That's the biggest problem with the SN25P, and depending on your plans for your system, it may or may not be a critical factor in your purchasing decision. Disabling USB2.0 support appears to solve most of the stability issues, so we're hopeful that a BIOS update is all that will be required. Before you run out and buy one of the other 939 SFFs, however, we would suggest caution. All of the units in this roundup were released before the X2 launch, and while all of the manufacturers have released updated BIOS versions to allow them to function with the new processors, we haven't verified stability. We suggest that you check around at some forums before you purchase any of these units with an X2 processor, or else wait for our X2 compatibility update.

Final Thoughts on the SN25P

There are other aspects of the SN25P that we have come to notice during our reviews of the other systems. The SN25P certainly deserves credit for being the first PCIe 939 unit to hit the retail market, but is being first the same as being best? In retrospect, the SN25P actually continues to stand up well. The design is well thought out, the features are right, and performance is also good. The X2 support is the only serious blemish, but there are a few other things that we would like to see addressed.

First, the system has five fans keeping it cool, and most people will add a sixth in the form of their graphics card. Making a silent system with six fans is probably not possible, unless you unplug several of the fans. While we don't fault the SN25P for the inclusion of so many fans - cooling is among the best in the business, and overclocking scores reflect this - we would like to see some modifications for future XPC designs. The use of two 40mm fans at the rear of the case is one thing that we'd like to see changed. We simply haven't had a lot of positive experience with small fans; they have to spin faster to move the same amount of air as larger fans, and that, in turn, creates more noise. Several 40mm fans that we've used - including one in this Shuttle as well as another in the PC-Club Silencer - developed a slight vibration as well, which is extremely annoying and often requires you to replace the fan. It's not an easy change to make to the P chassis, but optimistically, Shuttle can avoid the use of smaller fans in a future "large SFF" chassis. A single 60mm fan would actually have a larger area than two 40mm fans, and hopefully, it would be less likely to have vibration or bearing whine problems.

Going along with the fans is the noise that they make, and rising ambient temperatures during the summer months have certainly had an impact on noise levels from the SN25P. When we reviewed it in early March, it was generally very silent. In July, we noticed that the fans were being kicked into higher RPM states a lot more frequently than before. You'll notice in our noise benchmarks that the SN25P is one of the louder units under stress testing. Despite the higher noise levels, for typical use, the CPU will not get hot enough to cause a dramatic increase in fan noise. Video/audio encoding and running games will often increase the amount of noise for 5 to 30 seconds at a time, but silence for a minute or more usually follows.

Besides fans and noise levels, the layout and design of the SN25P have proved itself to be better and worse than other designs. The tool-less design makes changing parts around relatively simple, and we continue to appreciate that feature. In comparison to the G5 chassis, however, the CPU heat sink and cooling mechanism are not as easy to install. We also wish that there was a better clip mechanism on the PCIe X16 slot, and with the rest of the tool-less features, the expansion slots are notably absent. It's ironic that you can remove the CPU heat sink in the G5 chassis without using any tools, but a screwdriver is basically required to mount the heat sink properly with the P chassis. The last change that we'd like to see in the design of the SN25P is the inclusion of a proper 6-pin PCIe power cable - just in case you don't have one around. We'll discuss this topic in more detail later, and the SN25P isn't alone in this regard. Given the cost of the systems and the high-end feature set, we'd really appreciate getting a good $5 cable thrown in "just in case".

Update: For those that may read this in the future, Shuttle has released an updated BIOS that addresses the X2 support issues. We haven't confirmed anything yet, but a new BIOS is available and it specifically addresses the USB2.0 + X2 problem.
Reviewing a Small Form Factor System Biostar IDEQ 330P
Comments Locked

29 Comments

View All Comments

  • JarredWalton - Friday, August 12, 2005 - link

    I'll hit the KLOSS as soon as I can. (I have it already.) So unless someone else votes, I guess I'll get the KLOSS reviewed next.
  • Sokolum - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    For the last 2 months now i have a ST20G5 using as a MCE system. There are a few problems what i have encounbtered, one of them is that the system behaviour changes when i change a setting within the BIOS. Those aren't dramatic changes. But with every change, it looks like that the graphics runs muchmore slower, you can see this with dragging a windows screen over your desktop, you get trails from that window...
    The system only runs smooth when i *don't* touch those setting. Happily the things keep running smoothly when i enlarge the shared video memory.

    For the MCE side, i failed to make the Hauppauge 500MCE run compleetly as it should, i am only able to run TV 'Tunner 1' without problems when i *disable* TV 'Tunner 2' within windows Device Manager. Shuttle or Hauppauge couldn't help me with this case.
    As the review documented, this is one of the cases that RAID is causing the problem in this story. In my MCE setup, i don't use RAID (there is *no* room for a seccond drive when you installed a floppy drive). Why RAID is the problem, what i have been told is that RAID wants to use al of the PCI bandwith. It seems the nature of RAID in this kind of systems, just een told, i am not for 100% sure, but it seems plausible to mee.



    , a nice looking machine. I solved the problem for the flash cards with buying a floppy disk what come with a integrated card readed, see link:
    http://www.alternate.nl/html/shop/productDetails.h...">http://www.alternate.nl/html/shop/productDetails.h...

  • mino - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    Jared I must confes, this is the _first_ time i see everclocking test done as it should have been. I really appreciate the comments for newbies (it makes easier to me to explain to them if you could reference somthing :). Also finally use of correct term oo A64 base freq./FSB issue. I think this way is it should be done for _all_ A64 motherboard review.
    1) do a maximum base freq. check (by keeping memfreq. around DDR400 + CPU not overclocked
    2) do a max memclock test at 1T (with some proven components, just to check quality of CPU to MEM routing on the MB)
    3) do some max. overclock test (actually this may be optional since it depend mostly CPU chosen)

    Keep at this route and many readers may finaly undestand the basics of A64's OCing.
  • JarredWalton - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    I'm working on some detailed overclocking articles right now. Glad you enjoyed the section, and I'll be going into a LOT more detail (with benchmarks) on some future OC articles.
  • dropadrop - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    Thanks for the nice review,

    If you are considering a followup I would love to see you test usb. While the usb on my sn95g5 v2 works for casual things like a mouse, digital camera and memory card reader, it does not work for an ipod shuffle, external soundcard (hercules dj console), or external hardisk.

    There have been alot of people with similar experiences. It wold be great if you could find a way to test the sff's with a few "demanding" usb devices, and even measure the voltage (and stability of it) supplied via usb.

    I also second the request for you to test the sn95g5 with an X2. The new bios surely supports them, as people in north america have been getting their current rigs modded by shuttle for support. I would love to see how your's supports it (and maby even venice / san diego) without being modded. I believe you would have the chance to help alot of confused SN95G5 users by trying out a few cpu's in it.
  • JarredWalton - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    I will definitely give it a shot. At present, my intention is to purchase an external IDE HDD enclosure with USB2.0 and 1394A support and do some file transfers and such between that and the system. The problem with that approach is that the enclosures all have an external power source. Can anyone recommend an inexpensive USB/Firewire HDD enclosure that gets the power over the USB port? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82...">I found this one, but I'm not really keen on spending $160 for something I don't personally need.
  • dev0lution - Wednesday, August 10, 2005 - link

    How come the SN25P details don't mention the update from nforce4 standard to nForce4 Ultra? I'm thinking of getting one so I went to the previous review and it lists chipset in the specs as the nForce 4 standard, but if you go to Shuttle's current product page for the SN25P it lists the chipset as the Nforce4 Ultra. Who's correct?
  • JarredWalton - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    I think I may have just been lazy or neglectful in the original SN25P article. I'm pretty sure it was always nForce4 Ultra. Then again, regular nf4 vs. nF4U only adds SATA-II support IIRC. I don't see anything about SN25P supporting SATA-II which is sort of odd.
  • Cookie Crusher - Wednesday, August 10, 2005 - link

    I know it may be a "dated" or more "Entry Oriented" socket, but I have found that the socket 754 SFF systems are great for gaming and general use. Was there ever a roundup for them? If not, I'd like to see maybe a limited look at them to remind everyone that they are viable alternatives to, and about $75-$100+ cheaper than, these socket 939 options.

    I think it's important to point this out because of the note in the article that a SFF option incurs a premium....maybe so, but there are still cost effective options in that market. thanks.
  • Cookie Crusher - Wednesday, August 10, 2005 - link

    Nevermind.....i found the roundup I was hoping for.....still, would be nice to make that reference to the older socket types as legitimate choices for SFF hopefuls on a budget. :-)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now