The Design: Olympus IR-300


Click image to enlarge.

The front of the Olympus IR-300 features a 3x optical zoom with a 38 - 114mm (35mm equivalent) focal range. To the right of the lens is a red access lamp that illuminates whenever data is being written to the flash card. It will also blink to indicate that a self-timer is in progress. Above this lamp are the microphone and built-in flash.


Click image to enlarge.

The back of the IR-300 is kept very simple. The LCD monitor is 2.0" with 207K pixels. On the right side of the LCD monitor is a Menu button and a remote control receiver. The remote control is not included with the camera, but can be purchased separately for approximately $40. Below the remote control receiver is a 4-way controller with a separate OK button in the middle. At the bottom of the camera are the Erase and Custom/Print buttons.


Click image to enlarge.

On the top of the IR-300 is the main mode switch that changes the camera's mode from Record, Movie, and Play. Up and to the right of the mode switch are the main power button and the shutter button. Surrounding the shutter button is the zoom controller that operates the optical zoom in Record mode as well as the magnification of images in Play mode.

Click images to enlarge.

On the bottom left of the camera is a metal tripod mount. In the middle, you can see the connection for the included charging dock. On the right side is the sliding hinged door that conceals the compartment for the flash card and battery. The IR-300 does not come with an xD-Picture card. However, the camera does have 15 MB of internal memory. We highly recommend picking up at least a 256 MB xD-Picture card to get started. The battery is a rechargeable LI-40B Lithium-ion (3.7V 660mAh).


Click image to enlarge.

There's not much to see on the right side of the camera. From here, we can see the side of the card activity/self-timer lamp.


Click image to enlarge.

On the left side of the camera is a built-in speaker for playing audio from voice memos and video clips. There is also a post for the included wrist strap.

The Design: Nikon Coolpix S1 The Design: Sony DSC-T33
Comments Locked

35 Comments

View All Comments

  • stephencaston - Wednesday, July 20, 2005 - link

    Thanks for catching that Jarred, I've fixed it now.
  • Tujan - Wednesday, July 20, 2005 - link

    None of these cameras seem to get that soft lime-green colored square. Top right.

    What IS the true color of that 'Engineering Bldg.?
    _____________
    Which,or how well do these cameras work to create DVDs. How to determine this.Wich propietor has the best software. Wich software suite works best with wich camera to do so ? [ ]
    .........
    Most reviews miss this aspect of features for a camera.I've read for example,codec articles,wich tell of specificities of 'formats,and playback. Generally what you do with your output depends on how you want to use it though.Then what playback device/medium is wished to use. Some formats do not work so well with creation of DVDs.Or authoring. Those wich are most ubiquotous will give you most satisfaction for your camera.
    You might think that for example,that favorite movie you caught would be great to send to grandma. You can't capture it again though. However its an extra step to re-process the capture. So quality count of a good camera becomes the question of being able to edit from its usable format.What each uses,and how well it keeps the original intented quality for the use you want it to.
    Some Cameras will use the MPEG4 format for example.However the utility of editing this format to DVD is difficult to find exact detail from any reviews. In trying to keep of what you see is what you have using the Camera.



  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, July 19, 2005 - link

    You link for the Sony movie clip is broken. You've got a ".jpg" at the end of the file name. The Canon looks pretty nice, though I'm still holding out for SLR. Give me a few more months....
  • Thatkid - Tuesday, July 19, 2005 - link

    number 21 it is possible i actually took a hard looka t my camera as well nikon sometimes uses diffrent metals in there cameras im speaking from my experiance using there profresional cameras and they feel plastic but i did open the bettery lid and its a pretty thick metal shell. But you are right it defenately feels diffrent from the sont and cannon. the sony is brushed stainless teel i belive and is ver hard. the canon sd400 feels great its a small and dense feeling camera. they are very diffrent and when compared to the feel of these cameras it deos feel as if it were plastic but compare it to your mouse of keybaord or some sort of video game controller and youll see its a wierd metal.
  • stephencaston - Tuesday, July 19, 2005 - link

    #19, thats interesting. The sample we reviewed definitely felt like plastic and made a plastic sound when I tapped on the shell with my fingernail. It felt nothing like the solid metal of the SD400 or the T33. It didn't even feel cool to the touch after leaving it in air-conditioning like metal should. Perhaps the body is made of a very thin metal surrounded by plastic. Either that or you and I received different versions.
  • PrinceGaz - Tuesday, July 19, 2005 - link

    That Canon SD400 certainly looks very nice, not as high a resolution as the top-end SD500 but a bit smaller and lighter than it which is important to me. If I needed a replacement camera, that would be the one I'd go for.

    It's worth noting that in the UK (and maybe other countries) the Canon SD400 is called the Canon IXUS 50, but apart from the name is otherwise identical.
  • Thatkid - Tuesday, July 19, 2005 - link

    the nikon is made with an all metal body if you want to refrence that see Http://www.nikonusa.com/template.php?cat=1&grp=2&productNr=25529
    the bottom of the page says in bold compact super slim metal body. i know this also because i own one.
    my friend has a SD400 weve done all the posible real life senario test possible night time shooting in clubs both get the same exact looking prints some small discrepensies in color cast in the pictures but other then that same performance on both awsome cameras. one thing this article didnt mention is the annoying yellow cast in all the sony t33 pictures sony may advertise 1000+ shots for the t33 but with flash and normal usage checking you pics and that kinda stuff maybe 100 - 150 shots on one baterry. i had the t33 and returned it when i took a picture of the best buy roof only to find it looking extremly orange.
  • IceWindius - Monday, July 18, 2005 - link

    Canon wins again, go figure. My A85 farking rocks, I love it!
  • ShadowVlican - Monday, July 18, 2005 - link

    w00t canon wins again, happy i choose an A95
  • rubikcube - Monday, July 18, 2005 - link

    Been in the market for a camera for a while and was considering the digital rebel xt for quality concerns. After I read this review, I decided that the quality wouldn't be that different, so I ran out and bought the SD400. Thanks for the great review.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now