The Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio Review: Dynamic Design
by Brett Howse on October 5, 2021 9:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Laptops
- Microsoft
- Surface
- Surface Laptop Studio
Graphics Performance
As the successor to the Surface Book, the Surface Laptop Studio builds on that heritage by continuing to offer a reasonably powerful GPU in a small form factor laptop. Although not a gaming laptop by any stretch, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop graphics is a stout GPU for a notebook of this size. Microsoft also continues the tradition of the Surface Book by also offering a model without the dGPU, which they have found has been popular in certain segments such as education where the dGPU is not needed.
Microsoft provided the Core i7 model for review, which comes with the discrete GPU option, so that will be the focus of this review.
The NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti was announced earlier this year and features 2560 CUDA cores. The 128-bit memory bus clearly puts it at a disadvantage compared to the RTX 3060/3070/3080, but the lowered TDP means that it fits into smaller and lighter devices, such as the Surface Laptop Studio. Built on the 8 nm Samsung process, this Ampere-based GPU brings all the latest RTX features to the Surface Laptop Studio with 80 tensor cores and 20 ray tracing cores and is the first time Microsoft has fitted an RTX GPU into one of their devices since the Surface Book 3 was outfitted with the GTX 1660 Ti.
To see how the Surface Laptop Studio performs in graphical tests it was run through our laptop gaming suite. Please note that we have recently updated the suite with several new games, so until we test more devices there are limited results on those new titles.
As usual, we will start with some synthetic tests, then move on to gaming results.
3DMark
We are migrating the laptop suite over to the latest Time Spy test, so for now the Surface Laptop Studio is the only device tested. Fire Strike is the most demanding of the older test suite, and here the Surface Book with its GTX 1660 Ti slightly outperforms the Surface Laptop Studio, but on Sky Diver and Cloud Gate the tables are turned significantly.
GFXBench
GFXBench 5.0 includes DirectX 12 tests for Aztec Ruins, and as a multi-platform test it is quite a light workload for any laptop with a discrete GPU. Again, the Surface Book 3 slightly outperforms here.
Tomb Raider
In our first gaming benchmark the Surface Laptop Studio does surpass the Surface Book 3, although not by a wide margin on the 1920x1080 resolution.
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Much like Tomb Raider, performance is nearly identical between the Surface Book 3 and the Surface Laptop Studio. The GTX 1660 Ti is still able to hang with Ampere.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Again the Surface Book and Laptop Studio trade blows, although the Surface Book is ahead in the higher resolution by a wide margin.
Strange Brigade
Strange Brigade has a wide range of playable settings, allowing it to be played on integrated GPUs right up to the biggest GPUs around. The Surface Laptop Studio and Surface Book are again in a dead heat.
Shadow of War
Again we can see that the beefier GPU in the Surface Book 3, despite being a generation older, can still outperform Ampere. The GTX 1660 Ti offers more memory bandwidth and more ROPS than the RTX 3050 Ti, so it is not a huge surprise. Add in the higher TDP offered in the Surface Book and it makes sense why it can stretch ahead on the more demanding workloads.
Far Cry 5
Far Cry is a very CPU bound game, and as such the Surface Laptop Studio is able to stretch ahead here in the value settings, and keep pace in the 1920x1080 benchmark.
New Games to the Suite
For 2021 the gaming suite is being revamped, but as we only have scores from the Surface Laptop Studio, they will be presented here without any comparisons.
GPU Performance Conclusion
Microsoft calls the Surface Laptop Studio their most powerful Surface yet, and you can argue that is true of the system as a whole. On the GPU side though, the outgoing Surface Book 3 offered a more powerful GPU which offered more memory bandwidth, more ROPs, and more physical memory. It was of course able to do that because of the unique nature of the device, where the GPU got its own thermal zone in the laptop base. At best, the Surface Laptop Studio is just about as capable on the GPU front, although of course with the added benefit of the RTX architecture for Tensor and Ray Tracing abilities.
The RTX 3050 Ti is still a capable upgrade over integrated graphics, but certainly is not in the same league as the larger GPUs, especially at the power limits enforced on it in this design.
53 Comments
View All Comments
blppt - Thursday, October 7, 2021 - link
You think that's bad---my current Dell has on-chip Intel 620 and for some reason they also threw in the nearly useless MX130 from Nvidia as well. Talk about wasted silicon.Awells62 - Friday, October 8, 2021 - link
100% This is exactly why I canceled my order. Coming from my Surface Book 2 with a 1060... the 3050Ti isn't really that much of an upgrade, like an exceedingly minor upgrade compared to if they put a 3060 in there.amschroeder55 - Tuesday, October 5, 2021 - link
As a diehard lover of the SB lineup (still rocking that SB2 15 with 1060), I'm incredibly sad to see them go, particularly as it is finally feeling like good 15-25W cpu's are here/approaching to limit the need to go for a 35W (ala Zen 3 or otherwise), and honestly I think this folding hinge is a serious step back in ID, but I recognize it seemed inevitable when the gaps between models had been farther and farther apart.lemurbutton - Tuesday, October 5, 2021 - link
These laptops should be worse less than the M1 Macbook Air. At $1600 and $2,099.99, they're a joke.Wait for the M2X (A15-based) Macbook Pros coming out in a month.
lemurbutton - Tuesday, October 5, 2021 - link
worse --> worthZeratul56 - Tuesday, October 5, 2021 - link
The M1 is an impressive feat of cpu performance no doubt but to discount this computer on that alone is foolish.This offers a touch screen, pen input, optional internal graphics, and support for external graphics. It also has an articulating display in a form factor that is only 2 mm thicker than the Mac book pro.
You can say you don’t want or need any of those features which is fine but to say it’s a slam dunk for a MacBook Air is stupid.
Apple put out sub par cooling designs for their MacBook’s for year and now that the M1 exists suddenly every apple fanboy loves absolute cpu performance.
Byte - Tuesday, October 5, 2021 - link
For now the Macbooks are glorified ipads with keyboards. They just throw away decades of programs. I may be a MS whore, but I do run iPhones only and iPads. I guess it is fitting Apple will just do their own thing and you have to go MS or Linux to do real work.misan - Wednesday, October 6, 2021 - link
This doesn't make any sense. No software has been thrown away (all old Intel apps works) and major stuff already natively works on ARM anyway. My entire dev and data science setup has been ARM native since early spring 2021.Findecanor - Wednesday, October 6, 2021 - link
Apple's CPUs have been more efficient/powerful than Intel's for years. It has taken this long for their software engineers to perfect x86-64 emulation.The M1 also employs a few unique tricks for making x86-64 emulation perform better.
gund8912 - Monday, October 11, 2021 - link
Like what softwares/programs ?