AMD's Athlon 64 X2 4800+ & 4200+ Dual Core Performance Preview

109 Comments

View All Comments

• DrMrLordX - Monday, May 9, 2005 - link

  #9, I found it a little odd as well, but keep in mind that, not too long ago, Intel was still winning multimedia and 3d rendering benches on a regular basis with Northwood and Prescott. This might explain why Intel won narrow victories in some of the in-house multitasking benchmarks.
  
  What is clear is that the X2 is the superior processor when it comes to running lone multithreaded applications.
  
  The X2 is useful for anyone, while the Pentium D will only shine for people with distinctive usage patterns. Too bad the X2 costs so much.

• Zebo - Monday, May 9, 2005 - link

  #9 every REAL WORLD AMD wins. I don't even look at synthetics or contrived benches so someone else maybe tells you if Intel won one.:) They tend to do really well in those.

• Zebo - Monday, May 9, 2005 - link

  Total domination too bad I can't get one now!!!
  
  Anand what memory timings and CMD rate used in this review?

• Frew - Monday, May 9, 2005 - link

  Is overclocking the same with a dual core cpu?
  
  

• reactor - Monday, May 9, 2005 - link

  good article, cant wait to see how yonah stacks up so i can make a decision on what to get.
  
  btw the graphs all say intel pentium D 840, instead of 640.

• Aenslead - Monday, May 9, 2005 - link

  Is it just me, or did AMD win in EVERY benchmark program? Simply amazing.
  
  Still, it surprises me to see intel push ahead on multitasking by a tad.

• Swaid - Monday, May 9, 2005 - link

  I hate the price of admission!

• anandtechrocks - Monday, May 9, 2005 - link

  Amazing preformance, but half a G is really pushing it for a processor...

• Capt Caveman - Monday, May 9, 2005 - link

  I hate that we have to wait til Q3/Q4.

• Brian23 - Monday, May 9, 2005 - link

  While I'm very impressed by this IC, I hate paper launches.