Final Words

There is no doubt about it. The Canon EOS 350D is incredibly impressive for an entry-level digital SLR. In virtually all of our tests, it performed on par with its older and more expensive prosumer brother - the Canon EOS 20D. One of the biggest performance upgrades from the original digital rebel is the DIGIC II image processor. The DIGIC II processor provides the 350D with blazing fast processing speed and very low-noise images. In our timing tests, the 350D proved to be just as fast as the 20D, which is leaps and bounds faster than the original DRebel (300D). It has a remarkable startup time of 0.31 sec and, of course, shutter lag is of no concern. Where the 350D truly shines is with regard to cycle/write times. You are almost never left waiting for the camera to process/write images. The 350D has a much larger buffer than the 300D and thanks to the DIGIC II processor, the images are processed and dumped to the CF card at a very high speed.

With regard to image quality, the 350D does not disappoint. With the neutral processing parameter (2) selected, we found images to have excellent detail and overall exposure. The 350D also provides several preset and adjustable parameters allowing users to tweak the in-camera processing levels. Of course, as with all SLR cameras, it is expected that users will spend some time fine-tuning sharpness, contrast, etc. in post-processing. In comparing resolution capabilities, we found the 350D to have an identical resolution performance to the 20D. In addition, both the 350D and 20D show the same low level of noise in our noise analysis. The advantage of the 20D is that it has an option for ISO 3200 where the 350D only goes to ISO 1600.

As you can see, we couldn't find a lot to complain about with the 350D. We did think that the LCD monitor was a bit darker than it was on the 300D. This meant that we had to shield the monitor from the sun when reviewing images outdoors. Also, we are still rather disappointed with the Auto WB system under tungsten light as it produces a fairly strong yellowish cast. Finally, the size of the handgrip was a bit too small for us, which caused an uncomfortable strain in our hand after long periods of shooting. Anyone with larger hands will want to try holding the camera before purchasing it to make sure it feels right. Otherwise, we recommend getting the BG-E3 battery grip to provide more gripping support for ~$150. Along with the smaller body came a smaller battery as well. However, we are happy to see that the battery had no trouble lasting through several thousand frames in our battery test. All in all, the Canon 350D is an amazing deal at ~$890 for the body itself or ~$940 with the kit lens. If this camera looks appealing to you, take our word of caution about the grip seriously. Try to get your hands on one so that you can really get an idea of how it feels. It is exciting to see that the digital SLR market is rapidly expanding with faster and higher-quality cameras, and we are looking forward to what will come next.

 Pros  Cons
  • Instantaneous startup time
  • Lightning fast write speed thanks to DIGIC II
  • Very fast shutter lag
  • Excellent resolution
  • Impressive noise control
  • Roomy buffer (14 JPEG, 5 RAW)
  • Custom functions
  • Smaller and lighter body
  • Incredible battery life
  • LCD hard to see in bright sun
  • Handgrip uncomfortable for regular/large hands
  • Yellowish cast with Auto WB in tungsten light

Thanks again to Newegg.com for loaning us the Canon Rebel XT for review.

General Image Quality
Comments Locked

27 Comments

View All Comments

  • DVad3r - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    Hmm possibly, what page is the blurb on?
  • STaSh - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    That's probably the sensor that tracks if the camera is vertical or horizontal. It's used to determine how you want a vertical image to be displayed on the LCD.

    There should be a blurb in the manual about it.
  • DVad3r - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    I have a question to XT owners. I have noticed last night when holding my camera, that there seems to be something loose inside. I was just moving it up and down in my hands trying out different angles when I noticed what seems like something is moving around inside. The camera was brand new when I got it, and packed very nicely, and certainly has not been dropped or exposed to any shock at all. I was wondering if you guys have it too?
  • Rebel II - Thursday, August 25, 2005 - link

    I agree about the noise, there seems to be something loose in the camera. Mine is brand new and has not been subjected to any shock. I've been practicing using it and never noticed anything for the first six days. It is very quiet at times when I am practicing but I have never noticed a sound until the sixth night. I was using a "long exposer time" and after that I noticed a sound everytime I tilted the camera back and forth. I can even feel it as I move it. Everything seems to work the same. I can't figure out why I didn't notice it before. I was ready to return it but decided to check on the web to see what others have experienced. You are the second person to mention this so far as I have just began my search.
  • Possessed Freak - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    Hrmmm, I may actually have to try one of these out. I still use my Canon AE-1 program for all my picture taking. This DSLR really has me intrigued.
  • NFS4 - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    Stephen, I got my D70 Kit a few weeks ago from OneCall.com for $899.99 after a $100 Nikon rebate.

    Also don't forget the Nikon D50, which I hope you will be reviewing soon along with the Nikon D70S
  • Xtremist - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    Anyone want to buy the original Rebel? ;-) Man, I WANT one of these lol!
  • roibm - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    glad it's fixed... I freaked out seeing it didn't work with my default browser(opera) and then not even with firefox.
    I can confirm it works with both as well.
  • stephencaston - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    #6, the javascript problem has been fixed. It now works fine in Firefox, Opera, etc...

    #7, yes the Rebel XT shoots at 72 dpi
  • rootaxs - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    Thanks for the review, would you mind posting though if the processed photo's that come out of the XT are at 300dpi or 72dpi? (e.g. at max resolution, not resized to become a 300dpi image).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now