General Image Quality

For these pictures, the camera was reset to its factory default setting. Then, it was set to its highest quality recording setting. The pictures were then taken in Aperture-priority mode with Auto WB unless stated otherwise. Portrait-style images have been rotated automatically with the "Auto rotate" feature on the 350D. Click on a thumbnail to view the full-size image. All images were shot with Aperture-priority mode, Parameter 2, and sRGB.

 
16-35mm
ISO 100, 1/250th, f/4.0
Click to enlarge.
 
50mm Macro
ISO 100, 1/800th, f/5
Click to enlarge.
 
28-135mm IS
ISO 200, 1/320th, f/8
Click to enlarge.

 
28-135mm IS
ISO 100, 1/250th, f/4.5
Click to enlarge.
 
16-35mm
ISO 800, 1/200th, f/2.8
(Fluorescent WB)
Click to enlarge.
 
16-35mm
ISO 1600, 1/100th, f/5.0
Click to enlarge.

In the first sample image, we found the 350D capable of reproducing very impressive details when matched with a top quality lens. The image has a cool color cast, which resulted from the Auto WB setting. Had we selected the Shade or Cloudy setting, the colors would have been much more accurate. In samples 2 and 3, we want to point out that images right out of the camera will most likely be on the soft side with relatively low saturation. If a "punchier" image is desired right out of the camera, you will have better luck selecting a custom parameter in order to tweak the sharpness, contrast, etc.

In the fourth sample, we wanted to take a look at the 350D's dynamic range. Although this is a rather extreme example, the 350D has clearly overexposed the information in our crop. Avoiding overexposed subjects is an ongoing struggle with digital cameras and one way to deal with this is to shoot in RAW mode. More than likely, if this image had been taken as a RAW file, the highlight detail could have been saved. Sample 5 is another reason to shoot in RAW mode. Although we were satisfied with the detail and image quality, the colors aren't quite right. We set the camera to Fluorescent WB, but really, there was a mixture of fluorescent, tungsten, and indirect sunlight. In tough situations like this, it is best to shoot in RAW mode because you can easily adjust the WB later. Finally, in the last sample image, the 350D proves that it can take very detailed images even at ISO 1600. It is in shots like this that the 350D really benefits from the low-noise DIGIC II image processor. Overall, we are extremely impressed with the image quality of the 350D. Having shot with both the 20D and the 350D, we don't feel that there is any noticeable difference with regard to image quality other than the extra ISO option on the 20D (ISO 3200).

Long Exposure

 
16-35mm
ISO 100, 20 sec., f/7.1
Noise Reduction Off
Click on images to download.

 
16-35mm
ISO 100, 20 sec., f/7.1
Noise Reduction On
Click on images to download.


Hold mouse over image.

In comparing the two 20 sec. exposures above with and without noise reduction, we saw virtually no difference in the level of noise. We were extremely impressed with the image quality and couldn't find any stuck pixels throughout either image. The only difference between the two images that we could observe was an incredibly small difference in sharpness. The image taken without noise reduction appeared to be a tiny bit sharper than the image taken with noise reduction. You'll have to forgive the lopsided-ness of our night samples. We drove 110 miles to Greenville only to realize that we left our tripod at home.

Noise Final Words
Comments Locked

27 Comments

View All Comments

  • DVad3r - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    Hmm possibly, what page is the blurb on?
  • STaSh - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    That's probably the sensor that tracks if the camera is vertical or horizontal. It's used to determine how you want a vertical image to be displayed on the LCD.

    There should be a blurb in the manual about it.
  • DVad3r - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    I have a question to XT owners. I have noticed last night when holding my camera, that there seems to be something loose inside. I was just moving it up and down in my hands trying out different angles when I noticed what seems like something is moving around inside. The camera was brand new when I got it, and packed very nicely, and certainly has not been dropped or exposed to any shock at all. I was wondering if you guys have it too?
  • Rebel II - Thursday, August 25, 2005 - link

    I agree about the noise, there seems to be something loose in the camera. Mine is brand new and has not been subjected to any shock. I've been practicing using it and never noticed anything for the first six days. It is very quiet at times when I am practicing but I have never noticed a sound until the sixth night. I was using a "long exposer time" and after that I noticed a sound everytime I tilted the camera back and forth. I can even feel it as I move it. Everything seems to work the same. I can't figure out why I didn't notice it before. I was ready to return it but decided to check on the web to see what others have experienced. You are the second person to mention this so far as I have just began my search.
  • Possessed Freak - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    Hrmmm, I may actually have to try one of these out. I still use my Canon AE-1 program for all my picture taking. This DSLR really has me intrigued.
  • NFS4 - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    Stephen, I got my D70 Kit a few weeks ago from OneCall.com for $899.99 after a $100 Nikon rebate.

    Also don't forget the Nikon D50, which I hope you will be reviewing soon along with the Nikon D70S
  • Xtremist - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    Anyone want to buy the original Rebel? ;-) Man, I WANT one of these lol!
  • roibm - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    glad it's fixed... I freaked out seeing it didn't work with my default browser(opera) and then not even with firefox.
    I can confirm it works with both as well.
  • stephencaston - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    #6, the javascript problem has been fixed. It now works fine in Firefox, Opera, etc...

    #7, yes the Rebel XT shoots at 72 dpi
  • rootaxs - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link

    Thanks for the review, would you mind posting though if the processed photo's that come out of the XT are at 300dpi or 72dpi? (e.g. at max resolution, not resized to become a 300dpi image).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now