Test Results: OCZ PC3200 Platinum Rev. 2

To be considered stable for test purposes, Quake3 benchmark, UT2003 Demo, Super PI, Aquamark 3, and RTCW had to complete without incident. Any of these, and in particular Super PI and Return to Castle Wolfenstein, will crash a less-than stable memory configuration.

OCZ PC3200 Platinum Rev. 2 (DDR400) - 2 x 512Mb Double-Bank
CPU Ratio at 2.4GHz Memory Speed Memory Timings
& Voltage
Quake3
fps
Sandra UNBuffered Sandra Standard Buffered Super PI 2M places
(time in sec)
Wolfenstein - Radar - Enemy Territory
fps
12x200 400DDR 2-2-2-6
2.6V 1T
549.5 INT 2850
FLT 3045
INT 6066
FLT 6034
80 114.9
11x218 436DDR 2-3-2-6
2.8V 1T
546.3 INT 2893
FLT 3065
INT 6452
FLT 6385
81 114.3
10x240 480DDR 2.5-3-3-6
2.8V 1T
550.2 INT 3016
FLT 3231
INT 6709
FLT 6631
80 115.1
9x267 533DDR 2.5-4-3-6
2.9V 1T
554.6 INT 3101
FLT 3331
INT 7026
FLT 6940
80 116.0
9x318
(2.86 GHz)
Highest CPU/Mem Performance 2.5-4-3-7
2.9V 1T
649.0 INT 3562
FLT 3752
INT 7828
FLT 7739
72 136.4

The OCZ PC3200 Platinum Rev. 2 was the only memory to achieve its best performance at a 9 ratio - reaching DDR636 in our DFI test bed. This was achieved at the more desirable 1T Command Rate. This level of performance is outstanding, but it is definitely worth noting that OCZ TCCD at DDR636 2.5-4-3-7 performance is roughly equivalent to OCZ VX Gold at 10x267 2-2-2-6. This is particularly interesting, since the CPU speed at 318x9 is 2.86GHz compared to 2.67GHz at 267x10.

OCZ PC3200 Platinum Rev.2 performs very well as the representative of fast TCCD memory. We checked results with G. Skill TCCD and achieved close to the same performance as OCZ with stable performance at DDR630 (315). This represents the kinds of normal variations that you will find in top-performing memory at the highest performance levels.

As impressive as DDR636 sounds, fast memory timings and a fast memory chip can offset both a higher memory speed and a slightly higher CPU speed. The best TCCD can perform just as well as VX, but it required DDR636 and a 119 MHz faster speed to match OCZ VX at 2-2-2-6 timings.

Test Results: Crucial Ballistix PC3200 Performance Comparisons
Comments Locked

53 Comments

View All Comments

  • tkeoki - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link

    I was curious why new video drivers would make a difference in speed in the tests where the video subsystem is not involved. Anyone?
  • StormGod - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link

    In soviet Russia memory overvolts you!
  • ozzimark - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link

    *claps*

    you're my hero Wesley. thanks for going through and redoing the benches with the dfi. looks like you were right about the VX being faster at the same timings and speed.. though it still doesn't make sense to me. i'll have to do a bit of research into it.

    two things i'd like to say about the review though:

    first, a recommendation for an additional test. use the memory latency benchmark in everest ( http://www.lavalys.com/products/overview.php?pid=1... ). i have found that in my testing, the lower the latency, the better (duh) but if the latency is different for each ram at the same speeds and timings, it would definitly imply that not all ram is equal at equal settings.. which is what we're seeing here.

    second: why so much voltage for ballistix at low speeds? i have two sticks of the stuff myself, and have found that it helps tremendously if the drive strength is lowered to level 1 or level 2 on my dfi lanparty nf3-ut. i know the nf4 version is different, but it's something to keep in mind with tweaking.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now