Performance Comparisons

Performance of the OCZ EL PC4000 VX Gold, Corsair TwinX1024-4400C25, Crucial Ballistix PC3200, and OCZ PC3200 Platinum Rev.2 were compared on the DFI nForce4 AMD Athlon 64 platform. While we did not test on an Intel platform, the performance results can also be generally compared to previous benchmark results on the Intel test beds. More results are available in recent DDR memory reviews at:

OCZ VX Memory + DFI nForce4 = DDR533 at 2-2-2
Corsair 4400C25: Taking Samsung TCCD to New Heights
PQI & G. Skill: New Choices in 2-2-2 Memory
Athlon 64 Memory: Rewriting the Rules
OCZ 3700 Gold Rev. 3: DDR500 Value for Athlon 64 & Intel 478
Geil PC3200 Ultra X: High Speed & Record Bandwidth
=F-A-S-T= DDR Memory: 2-2-2 Roars on the Scene
Buffalo FireStix: Red Hot Name for a New High-End Memory
New DDR Highs: Shikatronics, OCZ, and the Fastest Memory Yet
The Return of 2-2-2: Corsair 3200XL & Samsung PC4000
OCZ 3700EB: Making Hay with Athlon 64
OCZ 3500EB: The Importance of Balanced Memory Timings
Mushkin PC3200 2-2-2 Special: Last of a Legend
PMI DDR533: A New Name in High-Performance Memory
Samsung PC3700: DDR466 Memory for the Masses
Kingmax Hardcore Memory: Tiny BGA Reaches For Top Speed
New Memory Highs: Corsair and OCZ Introduce DDR550
OCZ PC3700 Gold Rev. 2: The Universal Soldier
OCZ 4200EL: Tops in Memory Performance
Mushkin PC4000 High Performance: DDR500 PLUS
Corsair TwinX1024-4000 PRO: Improving DDR500 Performance
Mushkin & Adata: 2 for the Fast-Timings Lane
Searching for the Memory Holy Grail - Part 2

OCZ EL PC4000 VX Gold, Corsair TwinX1024-4400C25, Crucial Ballistix PC3200, and OCZ PC3200 Platinum Rev.2 were compared at 200x12 (2.4Ghz, DDR400), 218x11 (2.4Ghz, DDR436), 240x10 (2.4Ghz, DDR480), 267x9 (2.4Ghz, DDR533), and the Highest Memory Performance Settings that we could reach. With a constant CPU speed, memory comparisons (except for top performance) show the true impact of faster speed and slower memory timings on memory performance.

Test Results: OCZ PC3200 Platinum Rev. 2 DDR400/2.4GHz Performance
Comments Locked

53 Comments

View All Comments

  • adg1034 - Tuesday, April 19, 2005 - link

    Wesley- could you do a follow-up with the "Value VX"? I'd love to see how that does.
  • Gogar - Friday, April 15, 2005 - link

    I'm wondering how a 3000+ would perform in the used setup with the OCZ Plat rev2. Assuming it can reach the MHZ, would it really be the same as a 4000+?
  • JoKeRr - Sunday, April 3, 2005 - link

    #50, pretty sure A8N SLI gives Vdimm upto 3V.
  • ISS - Saturday, April 2, 2005 - link

    No doubt OCZ VX memory is cool. However, there is 1 major point to consider which I don't think anandtech did mention.

    Whats the long term effects of pushing running 3.5V on A64. I have read from forums that some users ended up with dead CPUs after pushing high memory voltages. I am not sure but I guess they have a dead memory controller. Can A64's on-die memory controller handle 3.5V Vdimm for prolong periods? Such as 3-6 months or even longer?

    AMD did mention before that running high Vdimm may damage the CPU and void the warranty though. Also, you would have notice that literally all board manufacturers other than DFI limits the Vdimm to just 2.85V.
  • cryptonomicon - Thursday, March 31, 2005 - link

    man, i wish they included a sweet pair of BH-5 in all of their mem tests (one of the 280+ mhz pairs 2225 ~3.3-3.4v) just so i would have a point of reference to all this NEW ram.
  • NotoriousGIB - Thursday, March 31, 2005 - link

    Ohh...last comment was for poster 26.
  • NotoriousGIB - Thursday, March 31, 2005 - link

    Thx for the comment, but I was already aware of that. Wesley, plz post your DRAM & Genie BIOS settings used in this comparison. If there are any other OCZ VX users that have busted 250MHz, please post your settings.
  • Zebo - Thursday, March 31, 2005 - link

    "zebo, i have no idea what you tried to just say "

    Don't worry about it just get the cheapest ram like Buffalo B-line /corsiar value and you'll be just fine. All this stuff is overated, overpriced and for competitive benchmarkers only.
  • ozzimark - Thursday, March 31, 2005 - link

    #39-
    i've been through 4 sticks of ballistix. all of them can make it to 245mhz at 2.5-2-2-5, which is the limit of my memory controller. i think inconsistancy is a thing of the past now.

    i would try to prove you wrong on your second point, but i'd need a new cpu for that :(
  • Teetu - Thursday, March 31, 2005 - link

    is there anyway I get anand's complete settings for the ballistix ram?

    i know with the older bios DFI recommended bank interleave off, but has that changed with the 3/10 bios?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now