Camera - Zoom Far Beyond

The new Galaxy S21 series have again very different camera setups between the regular variants, and the new Ultra variants. On the normal S21, we’re seeing the same camera configuration as on the last generation S20 series, a 12MP 1.8µm pixel f/1.8 main camera, a secondary wide-angle lens with 64MP 0.8µm pixels and f/2.0 optics that also allows you for high quality digital zooming, and finally a 12MP 1.4µm pixel f/2.2 ultra-wide-angle lens that’s also found in the Ultra models.

The Ultra models this year has changed more significantly. The 108MP main sensor with 0.8µm pixels that bin down to 2.4µm equivalent pixels in 12MP mode on paper looks the same as its predecessor, but is actually a new model that is advertised to feature new dual-conversion gain as well as varying conversion gain capability within one frame readout for better HDR captures. The optics are still f/1.8 with OIS here.

In terms of zoom lenses, we’ve seen much differentiation compared to last year. The 4x optical module from the S20 Ultra has been replaced by a 10x optical module, however the sensor resolution has been reduced from 48MP down to 10MP. The aperture is a very dark f/4.9, and of course has OIS which is needed at these focal lengths.

To narrow the gap in focal length between the 24mm equivalent main camera and the 240mm equivalent periscope telephoto module, we see the introduction of a fourth new camera module with 3x optical magnification (72mm equivalent), with a 10MP sensor and f/2.4 aperture. This is a traditional optics stack module.

For today’s comparison, I included both new Snapdragon and Exynos S21 Ultras to investigate any possible differences in processing between the two models, as well as a slew of other competing phones, including the new Mi 11 which we’ll review soon. Due to the extreme focal length of the new S21 Ultra telephotos I added in reference shots using a 50-230mm alongside the usual 18-55 shots on my Fujifilm X-T30; the shots here should serve as reference for colour reproduction and possible dynamic range of a proper camera, alongside the smartphone shots.

We’ll first focus on the telephoto photos in this page, looking at the main and wide-angle more closely in the next page’s results.

Click for full image
[ S21U(S) ] [ S21U(E) ]
[ S21(E) ] [ S20+(E) ]
[ Note20U(S) ] [ iPhone 12 Pro ]
[ Mate40 Pro ] [ Mi 11 ]
[ Mi 10 Pro ] [ Pixel 5 ]
[ X-T30 ( )( ) ]

Starting with the first shot, what’s immediately noticeable at the longer focal lengths is that there’s only very few phones which are able to do better than the S21 Ultra. Having a 10x optical telephoto at 240mm is well beyond other contemporary phones, and in this regard, it does seem to pay off for Samsung to invest in this massive camera module in terms of internal space.

The Snapdragon and Exynos shots are a bit different here, and I do prefer the brighter and more accurate exposure of the Exynos, although the picture is grainier.

At the 3x telephoto level, the S21 Ultra’s new module pays off in terms of bridging the quality gap, however for some reason I’m not too blown away here, particularly if you compare it to the 3x digital zoom of the Galaxy S21 and S20’s 64MP secondary module.

What’s really disappointing for me is to see Samsung’s 2x level is still horrible – it’s simply just a digital zoom of the 1x 12MP main camera capture, whereas other hi-res main camera module vendors such as Huawei or Xiaomi are using crops out of the 52/108MP modes which much superior quality.

Click for full image
[ S21U(S) ] [ S21U(E) ]
[ S21(E) ] [ S20+(E) ]
[ Note20U(S) ] [ iPhone 12 Pro ]
[ Mate40 Pro ] [ Mi 11 ]
[ Mi 10 Pro ] [ Pixel 5 ]
[ X-T30 ( )( ) ]

Continuing on with a zoom of the clock face here, the S21 Ultra remains pretty much unrivalled in terms of sheer resolving power and detail.

There are still quite obvious differences in processing between the Snapdragon and Exynos, and I prefer the latter’s more natural retention of detail as I feel the Snapdragon at these zoom levels feels like overly too artificial in detail.

The 3x results are also much in favour of the Exynos, though this highly depends on the areas we’re looking as it seems Samsung is employing extensive image stacking depending on the area of the image, with some sections being notably sharper or blurrier than others. It’s still very weird that even at what’s supposed to be the sensor’s native resolution, it generally doesn’t seem that it’s actually native in the result, with the S21’s 64MP module not being that far behind.

Click for full image
[ S21U(S) ] [ S21U(E) ]
[ S21(E) ] [ S20+(E) ]
[ Note20U(S) ] [ iPhone 12 Pro ]
[ Mate40 Pro ] [ Mi 11 ]
[ Mi 10 Pro ] [ Pixel 5 ]
[ X-T30 ( )( ) ]

In this scene, beyond again showcasing the far reach of the S21 Ultra, we’re again seeing very different processing between the two chipset variants, with this time around the Snapdragon unit showcasing a more natural look with more details.

Click for full image
[ S21U(S) ] [ S21U(E) ]
[ S21(E) ] [ S20+(E) ]
[ Note20U(S) ] [ iPhone 12 Pro ]
[ Mate40 Pro ] [ Mi 11 ]
[ Mi 10 Pro ] [ Pixel 5 ]
[ X-T30 ( )( ) ]

Samsung’s segmented multi-frame processing is also extremely visible here – the Exynos has better details in the highlights, although very noisy, and blurry shadows, but the Snapdragon has better shadows, albeit blurry highlights.

Click for full image
[ S21U(S) ] [ S21U(E) ]
[ S21(E) ] [ S20+(E) ]
[ Note20U(S) ] [ iPhone 12 Pro ]
[ Mate40 Pro ] [ Mi 11 ]
[ Mi 10 Pro ] [ Pixel 5 ]
[ X-T30 ( )( ) ]

In a more demanding high dynamic range shot as here, the S21 Ultras didn’t do well when zooming out to the horizon, both underexposing too much with far too fast shutter speeds.

This was a generally tough scenario for all the phones involved so they really didn’t do well at all in terms of exposures and dynamic range.

Overall Telephoto Experience

In terms of far-reaching focal lengths, the new Galaxy S21 Ultra is pretty much unrivalled in the market right now. We’ve seen attempts from other vendors in deploying such optical designs at this magnification, but those were usually combined with tiny sensors, or bad optical performances. The S21 Ultra’s strength is in the optical design of the new periscope module – although it’s only f/4.9, and that can show in some scenarios, it has extremely good optical characteristics in terms of sharpness and general lack of haze, which was previously a problem in the first generation of these kind of modules.

Samsung’s problem I think still lies more in the intermediary zoom levels. 2x zoom is still abhorrent in the way that it’s just a digital magnification of the 1x main sensor output at 12MP, and we yet again see the regular S21 outperform the Ultra at this focal length frame, which is kind of embarrassing.

The 3x telephoto module helps bridge the gap, but it’s still a very large gap to the switch to 10x and the dedicated module. It’s best to avoid anything beyond 5x and 10x as it just looks bad. Samsung here is employing sensor fusion between the 3x and 10x module in small segmented patches, and much like the sensor fusion on the S20 Ultra, it still looks terrible in this implementation as it’s just inconsistent.

I wish Samsung would finally have a more solid solution for these intermediate levels of magnification, the regular Galaxy S21 just offers a significantly better quality and more streamlined experience in this regard, much like the S20 outperformed the S20 Ultra last year. The company should take notes from Huawei and how they use their high-resolution sensor in different binning modes to solve this.

Battery Life - Actually Great Camera - HDR
Comments Locked

122 Comments

View All Comments

  • sanjeev2.k - Monday, February 22, 2021 - link

    I am assuming system wide dark theme was not turned on during battery life test. So by how much roughly will the battery life improve if dark mode is turned on?
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Monday, February 22, 2021 - link

    It doesn't affect our tests, unless I also enable the browser dark mode.
  • jhoff80 - Monday, February 22, 2021 - link

    I mostly like my S21 Ultra a lot, but I still hate a lot about the software. Even as OneUI has improved greatly over the years, there's some really stupid stuff here or there. Like I should be able to disable or uninstall Samsung's duplicate apps (calendar, contacts, clock, etc.) without adb. But that's fine, there's a workaround for that, so that's just annoying.

    What really annoys me that I can't work around as far as I'm aware is that I can't disable half of the unnecessary notifications that Samsung gives me. Like constant notifications when my Bluetooth headset battery is low (and if I swipe them away they come right back for each percent lost). Or a notification for do not disturb being on (even though DND is in my quick settings). Or a notification that I need to unlock my phone after a reboot to see more notifications. Android has settings to turn notifications off, but Samsung doesn't let me flip the switch on ones they think I need to be forced to see.

    And other than that, I dislike the scoped storage issues with Google Photos, and the fact I can't set Samsung's camera app to go directly to Google Photos instead of their inadequate Gallery app. And I'm slightly disappointed that the S21 removed ANT+ support. And I hate that I can't set the power/side button to the devices menu like I did with my Pixel 4XL. But I worked around that with sideActions set to go directly to SmartThings instead.

    But still, overall I really like it. It's faster than my Pixel 4XL, has a better camera (though I continue to dislike Samsung's post-processing in general, it sometimes smears things), I missed having the capability to use the S-pen compared to my even older Note8, and the fingerprint reader over face scanning is a huge bonus in the Covid era.

    I just really don't get why Samsung wastes their time on duplicate apps nobody wants, or why they prevent the user from actually taking control over their experience. Oh well. At least there's workarounds for most of it.
  • Edwardmcardle - Friday, February 26, 2021 - link

    They messed up the split screen multitasking imo. It's still has the advantage of keyboard pop not bumping the top half off the screen, but swiping home now minamises BOTH screens , where it should normally only minimise the active screen
  • Wereweeb - Monday, February 22, 2021 - link

    Yeah, they really f*cked up with the screens. Less than 400 PPI in an S-series? My last Sammy was an S6 Edge, and that f*cking thing had a 577 PPI screen.

    Sure, younger me couldn't really tell the difference to a good 1080p 5-incher, but it simply doesn't make sense to decrease the resolution *after* display sizes have increased so much that the sharpness of QHD is actually noticeable to the average user.

    Glad they added back a flat screen option, I've always despised curved displays (I didn't buy that S6 Edge, it was handed down). But all in all, it sounds more like an A92+ than an S21.
  • Retycint - Tuesday, February 23, 2021 - link

    To make things worse, it's a pentile/non-full-rgb matrix, so it's going to look worse than a 1080p LCD of the same size. Why pay $1000 when you can get a QHD 120Hz in the Mi 11 for a couple hundred less?
  • DJ XtAzY - Monday, February 22, 2021 - link

    Anything on the video quality, or was that in a different article?
  • BedfordTim - Tuesday, February 23, 2021 - link

    Also anything about the fingerprint sensor? Poor Amazon reviews were one of the reasons I chose a P30Pro over the S20 last time.
  • Edwardmcardle - Friday, February 26, 2021 - link

    I think the ultrasonic is the best available, works with screen off and this generation is exceptionally fast and accurate
  • bcronce - Monday, February 22, 2021 - link

    I saw USCC now has unlimited plans that were cheaper than the plan I was on. The wife went in to switch our lines over and came back with an S21 basic for me to place my S7. At $13/m over a 30 month contract, we will only be paying $400 for the phone.

    My last plan was technically unlimited, but only in the sense that going over 2GB would drop me into 3G speeds with no overage. But now with truly unlimited, I no longer have artificial caps on speed, only have to compete with congestion. For an extra $10/m, I could get 25GB of "high priority" data, and $20/m extra, 50GB. I'm fine with best effort and no artificial limits.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now