Final Words

When a company produces some of the best gaming laptops in the industry decides to take a step back into the consumer world of Ultrabooks, expectations are high. MSI has some very stiff competition though, with some fantastic designs over the last year or two really pushing the Ultrabook to new highs. MSI’s Prestige 14 Evo offers some great features, but is also let down in a couple of key areas.

While MSI has built the Prestige out of quality materials, the overall design just can’t match laptops like the Dell XPS 13, HP Spectre, or Lenovo’s ThinkPad X1 Carbon. By comparison, the MSI design feels very safe, and a bit on the boring side, which is a real surprise when you consider some of the dramatic gaming systems MSI has produced. It may seem a bit harsh to continually harp on it, but the 16:9 display is also a drawback, and creates a lot of unused space when looking at the display. MSI could have easily fit a 16:10 display into the same size chassis, providing the end user with some more vertical room for productivity. Finally, the decision to leverage a lifting hinge, which raises the rear of the device up to 5° in the guise of making a better typing experience is ergonomically a poor design.

The hinge allows for 180° opening, but the laptop is not able to lay flat

Coupled to the design issues is a poor keyboard. The layout is not standard, but could be adjusted to, but the key feel is just not great. There is not a lot of feedback from the keys when using them, and despite the reasonable travel, it ends up being a rather unsatisfying experience. The biggest tragedy here is that MSI offers some of the best laptop keyboards on the market in their gaming laptops, but has chosen a much different design for the Prestige lineup.

As one of the launch devices for Intel’s Evo platform though, the MSI does deliver. The Prestige 14 Evo offers very solid battery life, excellent Wi-Fi performance, and quick charging. It also features Windows Hello with your choice of either IR or fingerprint, and more choice is never a bad thing.

This is our first production device to feature Intel’s newest Tiger Lake platform, and it is amazing how much more performance it offers over the outgoing Ice Lake design. Despite offering just four CPU cores compared to AMD’s Renoir SoC which can have up to eight, it offers superior single-core performance, and can almost match Renoir in multi-threading tasks. Although the Willow Cove CPU cores are only a slight change from last year’s Sunny Cove design, the new 10 nm SuperFin process allows Intel to drive frequencies much higher than they could achieve with Ice Lake.

The cost of that extra frequency though is power draw. On sustained loads, the MSI Prestige allowed for around 30 Watts of power to the CPU package in its maximum performance mode. Sound levels were extreme, and the CPU temperature was bouncing off its limit, but MSI does allow its owners to extract everything out of the device when needed. Happily, you can also switch to a silent mode which is more enjoyable to use for most tasks, but the performance is there when it is needed.

Intel’s new Xe graphics is also a major leap forward in terms of integrated graphics performance. The new larger, faster graphics package could easily double the performance of last year’s Ice Lake design in many real-world games. Across the board, Intel was able to out-muscle AMD’s Vega graphics in Renoir, which did not seem possible when you think of the performance of Intel’s long-used UHD graphics platform it had used previously. While not quite matching low-end gaming systems, Intel’s Xe does at least allow for some gaming to be done with no extra dGPU necessary. This should be an exciting space to watch evolve now.

Another unexpected surprise was to see MSI had calibrated the display on the Prestige 14. Although the 16:9 is a let-down, there have only been a couple of companies to do this, and it makes a big difference for the end user. MSI somewhat markets the Prestige as a content creator device, so it is excellent to see them take that to heart in terms of color accuracy on the display.

But the one area where MSI has done very well is on price. As of this writing, the Prestige 14 Evo starts at just $1149 USD, and that includes the Core i7-1185G7, 16 GB of LPDDR4X RAM, and a 512 GB SSD. Due to Intel now segmenting its CPU stack with differing GPU sizes, which followed what AMD has done with Vega, the starting price is a very compelling package. You can pick a couple of colors, and a couple of drive sizes, but unlike most of the competition, the base model is pretty much fully decked out. Despite a design that can’t quite match some of the others in the market, MSI’s Prestige 14 Evo does pack a punch for a reasonable price.

 
Wireless, Audio, Thermals, and Software
Comments Locked

63 Comments

View All Comments

  • lmcd - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    ASUS provides great support for its monitors. No idea if that extends to laptops but it might?

    Otherwise I'm right with you on the terrible support.
  • Spunjji - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    It's more profitable long-term to provide dismal support. As long as everybody in the PC market is providing a roughly equally poor standard of support, then it ceases to be a factor for comparison, and they can all benefit by paying poorly-trained and demotivated staff a pittance.
  • 0iron - Thursday, December 17, 2020 - link

    I hope there's some explanation on PCMark 10 - Productivity results.
  • vikas.sm - Thursday, December 17, 2020 - link

    The USB 2.0 port is possibly for
    1. Installing various flavors of linux.
    2. Allowing mouse/KB connection while blocking data transfer in an office environment.
    I've worked on hundreds of machines where OS installation just didn't work properly with the media connected to a USB 3.0 port. Granted, this was a few years ago, but I cant see other logical reasons for it.
  • Samus - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    I can't believe how fast these 15-watt CPU's are. They obliterate many current 65w+ desktop CPU's.
  • Spunjji - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    Only if those CPUs are Intel, and only if we continue to pretend that a 50W turbo and ~35W continuous power draw is "15W". 65W Zen 3 nukes this from orbit.

    If you actually limit the CPU to 15W long power draw (or even 20W) it's significantly slower.
  • edzieba - Monday, December 21, 2020 - link

    The battery life results belie the "but it's not 15W, it's really 50W!" claims. There's a reason constant-power CPU operation was abandoned by everyone at least a decade ago.
  • logoffon - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    They should've put the Fn key on where that stupid duplicated key is so that the right Ctrl key would be in full-size. I don't understand why they thought having two backslash keys were a good idea.
  • sonny73n - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    What a stupid design with the back edge of the display is also the foot when the lid lifts up (copied from Asus).
    Warning: 1- Don't open and close the lid too often or the hard plastic feet will wear out and get scratches which will catch dust making your laptop looks nasty. 2- Type lightly. Don't rest your palms on the laptop when you type or the hinges might break.
  • sonny73n - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    And yay, the power button is where the delete key should be (also copied from stupid Asus Zenbook design).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now