Final Words

When a company produces some of the best gaming laptops in the industry decides to take a step back into the consumer world of Ultrabooks, expectations are high. MSI has some very stiff competition though, with some fantastic designs over the last year or two really pushing the Ultrabook to new highs. MSI’s Prestige 14 Evo offers some great features, but is also let down in a couple of key areas.

While MSI has built the Prestige out of quality materials, the overall design just can’t match laptops like the Dell XPS 13, HP Spectre, or Lenovo’s ThinkPad X1 Carbon. By comparison, the MSI design feels very safe, and a bit on the boring side, which is a real surprise when you consider some of the dramatic gaming systems MSI has produced. It may seem a bit harsh to continually harp on it, but the 16:9 display is also a drawback, and creates a lot of unused space when looking at the display. MSI could have easily fit a 16:10 display into the same size chassis, providing the end user with some more vertical room for productivity. Finally, the decision to leverage a lifting hinge, which raises the rear of the device up to 5° in the guise of making a better typing experience is ergonomically a poor design.

The hinge allows for 180° opening, but the laptop is not able to lay flat

Coupled to the design issues is a poor keyboard. The layout is not standard, but could be adjusted to, but the key feel is just not great. There is not a lot of feedback from the keys when using them, and despite the reasonable travel, it ends up being a rather unsatisfying experience. The biggest tragedy here is that MSI offers some of the best laptop keyboards on the market in their gaming laptops, but has chosen a much different design for the Prestige lineup.

As one of the launch devices for Intel’s Evo platform though, the MSI does deliver. The Prestige 14 Evo offers very solid battery life, excellent Wi-Fi performance, and quick charging. It also features Windows Hello with your choice of either IR or fingerprint, and more choice is never a bad thing.

This is our first production device to feature Intel’s newest Tiger Lake platform, and it is amazing how much more performance it offers over the outgoing Ice Lake design. Despite offering just four CPU cores compared to AMD’s Renoir SoC which can have up to eight, it offers superior single-core performance, and can almost match Renoir in multi-threading tasks. Although the Willow Cove CPU cores are only a slight change from last year’s Sunny Cove design, the new 10 nm SuperFin process allows Intel to drive frequencies much higher than they could achieve with Ice Lake.

The cost of that extra frequency though is power draw. On sustained loads, the MSI Prestige allowed for around 30 Watts of power to the CPU package in its maximum performance mode. Sound levels were extreme, and the CPU temperature was bouncing off its limit, but MSI does allow its owners to extract everything out of the device when needed. Happily, you can also switch to a silent mode which is more enjoyable to use for most tasks, but the performance is there when it is needed.

Intel’s new Xe graphics is also a major leap forward in terms of integrated graphics performance. The new larger, faster graphics package could easily double the performance of last year’s Ice Lake design in many real-world games. Across the board, Intel was able to out-muscle AMD’s Vega graphics in Renoir, which did not seem possible when you think of the performance of Intel’s long-used UHD graphics platform it had used previously. While not quite matching low-end gaming systems, Intel’s Xe does at least allow for some gaming to be done with no extra dGPU necessary. This should be an exciting space to watch evolve now.

Another unexpected surprise was to see MSI had calibrated the display on the Prestige 14. Although the 16:9 is a let-down, there have only been a couple of companies to do this, and it makes a big difference for the end user. MSI somewhat markets the Prestige as a content creator device, so it is excellent to see them take that to heart in terms of color accuracy on the display.

But the one area where MSI has done very well is on price. As of this writing, the Prestige 14 Evo starts at just $1149 USD, and that includes the Core i7-1185G7, 16 GB of LPDDR4X RAM, and a 512 GB SSD. Due to Intel now segmenting its CPU stack with differing GPU sizes, which followed what AMD has done with Vega, the starting price is a very compelling package. You can pick a couple of colors, and a couple of drive sizes, but unlike most of the competition, the base model is pretty much fully decked out. Despite a design that can’t quite match some of the others in the market, MSI’s Prestige 14 Evo does pack a punch for a reasonable price.

 
Wireless, Audio, Thermals, and Software
Comments Locked

63 Comments

View All Comments

  • Spunjji - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    It's a fair point. The 4000 series isn't last-gen until the newer devices are out. It still competes pretty well, though.
  • lucasdclopes - Thursday, December 17, 2020 - link

    AMD's CPUs beating Intel's CPU.
    Intel's IGP beating AMD's IGP
    What a time to be alive...
  • Speedfriend - Thursday, December 17, 2020 - link

    And Apples CPU and GPU smashing both. On its first attempt...
  • zodiacfml - Thursday, December 17, 2020 - link

    Not really, AMD's high end mobile APUs can compete or beat the M1 on heavy workloads. to be fair, m1 is Apple's entry level design
  • KPOM - Thursday, December 17, 2020 - link

    The point is that the M1 draws so little power, Apple removed the fan from the MacBook Air and still tripled its multi-core performance.
  • senttoschool - Thursday, December 17, 2020 - link

    M1 smashes AMD in any workload that is not Cinbench R23 Multithread. There.

    Otherwise, the M1 is superior is just about every way including power, temperature, battery life, no throttling on battery, GPU, encoding and decoding, SSD speeds, and of course, single thread.
  • whatthe123 - Thursday, December 17, 2020 - link

    that's already been tested and proven untrue. it is far superior in efficiency, but loses when more than 4 cores/8 threads are utilized and when memory systems are comparable. either its artificially capped to keep power down or the design's efficiency curve falls off at higher frequencies because it absolutely does not outperform x86 8C/16T parts. it's also on a cutting edge node competing with 7nm/10nm parts yet its basically the same single thread performance as zen 3, so not exactly blowing anyone away with just raw architecture.
  • lemurbutton - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    It is true. The M1 is faster than the 4900HS in multithread Geekbench which tests a variety of workloads and it's significantly faster in single core. And unlike AMD processors, it does not throttle when it's on battery and it has 2x more battery life in general.

    So no. AMD's very best mobile processors can't touch the M1.
  • Kuhar - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    Don`t bother with delusional apple fanboys.
  • Sailor23M - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    @senttoschool Well put, TY.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now