CPU Performance, Short Form

For our motherboard reviews, we use our short form testing method. These tests usually focus on if a motherboard is using MultiCore Turbo (the feature used to have maximum turbo on at all times, giving a frequency advantage), or if there are slight gains to be had from tweaking the firmware. We put the memory settings at the CPU manufacturers suggested frequency, making it very easy to see which motherboards have MCT enabled by default.

For Z490/W480 we are running using Windows 10 64-bit with the 1909 update.

Update: A Note About W480 and Turbo

Normally we test our motherboards with out of the box settings. This means that the performance will get boosted based on whatever default algorithm each motherboard vendor implements with regards turbo time and boost power. Intel actively encourages this - the numbers it puts in for turbo time and turbo power are recommendations, rather than specifications, and Intel wants motherboard vendors to engineer their products to the turbo and power that each vendor deems acceptable for their product. As a result, a lot of Z480 motherboards will implement an aggressive turbo algorithm.

W480 motherboards by contrast are more in-line with Intel's recommended settings. Turbo is still there, but it ends up being limited over the short time as determined by Intel. For users that want the 'truer' performance profile of Intel's Comet Lake as defined by the manufacturer, then scoping out a W480 board and W-1200 system might be for you.

 

Rendering - Blender 2.7b: 3D Creation Suite

A high profile rendering tool, Blender is open-source allowing for massive amounts of configurability, and is used by a number of high-profile animation studios worldwide. The organization recently released a Blender benchmark package, a couple of weeks after we had narrowed our Blender test for our new suite, however their test can take over an hour. For our results, we run one of the sub-tests in that suite through the command line - a standard ‘bmw27’ scene in CPU only mode, and measure the time to complete the render.

Blender 2.79b bmw27_cpu Benchmark

Rendering – POV-Ray 3.7.1: Ray Tracing

The Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer, or POV-Ray, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 1-2 minutes on high-end platforms.

POV-Ray 3.7.1 Benchmark

Rendering - Crysis CPU Render

One of the most oft used memes in computer gaming is ‘Can It Run Crysis?’. The original 2007 game, built in the Crytek engine by Crytek, was heralded as a computationally complex title for the hardware at the time and several years after, suggesting that a user needed graphics hardware from the future in order to run it. Fast forward over a decade, and the game runs fairly easily on modern GPUs, but we can also apply the same concept to pure CPU rendering – can the CPU render Crysis? Since 64 core processors entered the market, one can dream. We built a benchmark to see whether the hardware can.

For this test, we’re running Crysis’ own GPU benchmark, but in CPU render mode. This is a 2000 frame test, which we run over a series of resolutions from 800x600 up to 1920x1080. For simplicity, we provide the 1080p test here.

Crysis CPU Render: (6) 1920x1080

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz, and IPC win in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.

3D Particle Movement v2.1

NAMD ApoA1

One frequent request over the years has been for some form of molecular dynamics simulation. Molecular dynamics forms the basis of a lot of computational biology and chemistry when modeling specific molecules, enabling researchers to find low energy configurations or potential active binding sites, especially when looking at larger proteins. We’re using the NAMD software here, or Nanoscale Molecular Dynamics, often cited for its parallel efficiency. Unfortunately the version we’re using is limited to 64 threads on Windows, but we can still use it to analyze our processors. We’re simulating the ApoA1 protein for 10 minutes, and reporting back the ‘nanoseconds per day’ that our processor can simulate. Molecular dynamics is so complex that yes, you can spend a day simply calculating a nanosecond of molecular movement.

NAMD 2.31 Molecular Dynamics (ApoA1)

System Performance Power Delivery Thermal Analysis
Comments Locked

55 Comments

View All Comments

  • timecop1818 - Friday, December 11, 2020 - link

    > Hasn't AMD pretty much made any Intel-based workstation/HEDT build pointless

    Not at all, those who want an actual working and stable platform continue to build with Intel.

    The reason why an Intel motherboard review didn't mention AMD should be fucking obvious, it's completely irrelevant here.
  • ae00711 - Saturday, December 12, 2020 - link

    troll much?
  • Qasar - Saturday, December 12, 2020 - link

    thats what timecop1818 does best 😂😂😂😂😂
  • AntonErtl - Saturday, December 12, 2020 - link

    Unfortunately, AMD does not serve the market that this kind of board is for: AMD does not sell Ryzens (except the embedded Ryzen V2000) or Athlons where it officially supports ECC. Yes, you can build a Ryzen system with ECC (and we have such systems), but if you need official support (for CYA reasons), AMD does not compete.
  • Foeketijn - Saturday, December 12, 2020 - link

    Well, AMD misses one important thing, and that is an AM4 supermicroboard. That's why I switched to asrockrack.
  • AntonErtl - Saturday, December 12, 2020 - link

    We have mixed experiences with Supermicro, although they are from over a decade ago. One machine with a Supermicro board works to this day, 14 years later. 4 other Supermicro machines had problems from the start and died after a few years, and because major components were non-standard, they were a complete writeoff. We have good experiences with Tyan (these machines still work after 15+ years), but no recent experiences (somehow they no longer show up in our product searches); anyway, they don't have AM4 boards according to their website, only SP3 and TR4.
  • OliveGray - Sunday, December 13, 2020 - link

    hy
  • Smell This - Friday, December 11, 2020 - link

    I snagged a 65W Ryzen 3700X last week for $280 __ equivalent to the W-1270 80w

    "For every current W480 model on the market, there are at least 4-5 Z490 variants"
    ___________________________________________________

    And that's the rub on the workstation front. The woods are full of AMD chipsets and CPUs that "support ECC modules yet operate in non-ECC mode" __ some functionally supporting ECC modules. For the most part AMD held up their end of **chipset bargain** even as motherboards have grown more complex.

    The chipset fans ain't so bad, after all __ though I'm still a bit torqued that TR was orphaned ...
  • shabby - Friday, December 11, 2020 - link

    Only pcie 3? Get with the times intel 🙄
  • timecop1818 - Friday, December 11, 2020 - link

    Let's hear about your application which requires more bandwidth than PCIe3 can provide.

    I never understood all those people who complained about "two thunderbolt lanes" and "only pcie 3" but when asked to provide concrete examples where this would not be enough did not have any.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now