Data Warehouse results

As can be seen from the results, the doubling of the L2 Cache did not improve performance on the Xeon's in this test. We speculate that this is because the test consists of approximately 10 long running queries, which are processing datasets that are 100's of megabytes, thus not allowing for reuse of the L2 Cache. The Opteron, on the other hand, excelled due to its on-die memory controller. The different platforms exhibited approximately 50% CPU utilization across all CPUs. This demonstrates that you do not have to be CPU bound to experience the benefits of faster CPUs.

Data Warehouse Test


Data Warehouse Test Explained Price comparison & Final Words
Comments Locked

97 Comments

View All Comments

  • Jason Clark - Monday, February 14, 2005 - link

    bthomas, read page 1 please. We focus on the window side of the house and there is no released 64bit OS or SQL server yet.

    Quanticles, the only measure we has was ntune which reported the HT bus running at 1GHz. Dual configuration for all tests.

  • Quanticles - Monday, February 14, 2005 - link

    Did you check to make sure the HT bus was actually running at 1 GHz with an o-scope?

    Where you running these systems as 1P or 2P? I got the impression that you were running the tests as 1P systems and then was making recommendations on 2P systems.
  • bthomas - Monday, February 14, 2005 - link

    Geez. Nobody is mentioning the fact that the Opteron is running on a 32-bit OS in these tests.

    Yeah, its basically a wash under these conditions, but so what..the real test would be under 64 bit. DB applications/servers are supposed to really thrive in the 64-bit realm. Why didnt you test under a 64 bit OS/DB software like Linux/Postgres|MySQL/etc ?!?

    =b.t.






















  • rivieracadman - Monday, February 14, 2005 - link

    I forgot to ask; Does the 152 offer SSOI or is it still SOI. From the power ratings I can guess it's still SOI. Just curious ...
  • chucky2 - Monday, February 14, 2005 - link

    I like how vendors cripple the AMD offerings...sometimes ever so slightly, other times largely. Take a look at the two HP offerings listed out at the end of the article and tell me which one you'd like to buy? For $900 extra, I'll give up whatever performance benefit I'd see for the managability any day.

    Not AMD's fault...it's the vendors... :(

    Chuck
  • Fluff - Monday, February 14, 2005 - link

    Was NUMA enabled on 2003 Enterprise Edition for the 252?

    Did it make any difference?

    This was not made clear in the article.

    Unless /PAE is the equivalent.
  • mlittl3 - Monday, February 14, 2005 - link

    For those of you who are interested in what opterons will be made using 90 nm and 1 GHz hypertransport, here is the link on amd's website.

    http://www2.amd.com/us-en/OPN_Printer/1,,,00.html?...

    Sorry it is so long but there is a lot of scripting for filtering results on the page.

    To summarize, Opterons 242 (1.6 GHz) to 852 (2.6 GHz) are being updated to the new die process and HT bus.

    I would like to recommend to the author of the article to include a reference section at the end of every review to relevant websites for more information. This would be similar to the reference section in the article from Johan. The above link should go there as well as any links to more indepth architecture info on both AMD's and Intel's websites. Just a thought.
  • skiboysteve - Monday, February 14, 2005 - link

    that extra period at the end of post #28 made what would have been a normal statement entirely creepy as hell...
  • snorre - Monday, February 14, 2005 - link

    It would be more interesting with an update to these articles:
    http://anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=1982
    http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.html?i=1935

    "The true test that remains, however, is a test comparing AMD’s Opteron to Intel’s Itanium 2. Intel was not very receptive to the idea of doing a head-to-head; not out of a fear of losing, but out of a desire not to lend AMD any credibility by showing that the Opteron is indeed a competitor to the Itanium 2. While we do believe that the Itanium 2 in its 128-way configurations is definitely out of the Opteron’s league, in the 2-way and 4-way configurations that we are interested in comparing, the two are absolutely competitors.

    Whether Intel is looking to supply us with an Itanium 2 system or not, we will make that comparison."

    We're still waiting...
  • SpaceRanger - Monday, February 14, 2005 - link

    I'd love to see it Jason..

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now