The ASUS ROG Phone III Review: A 144Hz 6000mAh Beast With Caveats
by Andrei Frumusanu on August 28, 2020 9:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Mobile
- Smartphones
- Snapdragon 865
- ROG Phone III
Camera - Low Light Evaluation
Low-light photography of the ROG Phone III is a wildcard. On one hand, the phone lacks OIS which is a big detriment to low-light photography, but on the other hand, the device has a potent sensor, wide aperture, and now also features a night mode that might be able to still produce good images.
[ ROG Phone III ]
[iPhone 11 Pro ] - [Galaxy S20+(E) ]
[ Pixel 4 ] - [ X-T30 ]
As expected, the non-night mode shots of the phone are quite disappointing and are considerably worse than the competition.
The ultra-wide here is also night unusable and in the same bottom-tier as the iPhone 11’s unit.
When turning on night mode however, which by the way is triggered to come on by default when under low-light conditions, there’s a dramatic improvement in quality and it becomes usable, although it still can’t compete with other phones which have OIS.
[ ROG Phone III ]
[ iPhone 11 Pro ] - [ Galaxy S20+(E) ]
[ Pixel 4 ] - [ X-T30 ]
I did like the ROG3’s exposure here as it was the most realistic of the bunch, however it lacked the higher dynamic range in the shadows of other phones.
[ ROG Phone III ]
[ iPhone 11 Pro ] - [ Galaxy S20+(E) ]
[ Pixel 4 ] - [ X-T30 ]
In brighter scenes, the ROG3 does ok, but the lack of OIS shows in the lack of detail, and the shot just has worse dynamic range than the competition, although it remains quite usable.
[ ROG Phone III ]
[ iPhone 11 Pro ] - [ Galaxy S20+(E) ]
[ Pixel 4 ] - [ X-T30 ]
Surprisingly enough this scene was to the liking of the ASUS as it produced an excellent result that although it a bit bright, has tone of good retention of textures and detail and is quite ahead of all other mobile phones.
[ ROG Phone III ]
[ iPhone 11 Pro ] - [ Galaxy S20+(E) ]
[ Pixel 4 ] - [ X-T30 ]
The darker the scene, the worse the ROG3 fares as its shutter speed can’t go as low as other phones. The S20 is able to get double the amount of light at 1/8th a second over 1/20th of the ASUS, and the iPhone ½ second exposure really shines.
[ ROG Phone III ]
[ iPhone 11 Pro ] - [ Galaxy S20+(E) ]
[ Pixel 4 ] - [ X-T30 ]
And in the last shot again, the much slower shutter speeds of the ROG3 mean that it captures a lot less light than the competition.
Overall Low-Light Evaluation: Meh
Generally, the ROG Phone III just suffers greatly from the lack of OIS. Although its night mode seems to perform quite adequately and be competitive in terms of computational photography, the fact that its shutter speeds are always around four times faster than the competition means that it’s only able to capture about a quarter of the light. It’s very clearly a tier below other flagship devices, and generally not competitive.
71 Comments
View All Comments
s.yu - Wednesday, September 2, 2020 - link
I have more faith in the sound quality of a C port powered active adapter than a wireless adapter powered by a tiny battery.flyingpants265 - Sunday, August 30, 2020 - link
I love sdcards, but I'm willing to sacrifice for waterproofing. Also you can expend $ to get like 1tb storage. You can't pay more to get front speakers.. LAME.BS3 is cool, but also missing other stuff. And Xiaomi's crapware is bad
Lolimaster - Sunday, August 30, 2020 - link
Any flagship phone had "waterproof" +sd/sim slot. In fact, if a phone has a sim slot, there's no excuse for no sd support.benedict - Friday, August 28, 2020 - link
So the specs are almost the same as Xiaomi Mi 10, but the price is much higher. Asus is not a luxury brand when it comes to phones, so there's no excuse for the huge price premium.hemedans - Friday, August 28, 2020 - link
they always sell cheaper version with 8gb/128gb configuration, around $500.GC2:CS - Friday, August 28, 2020 - link
Does that mean S865+ is basically S865 with higher voltages allowed ?And a fan is needed to bring it back to regular temperatures.
Why ask a premium for it then ?
Also it is strange that the iP SE competes on GPU without people complaining that it burns their hands down.
Andrei Frumusanu - Friday, August 28, 2020 - link
So far on the 3 S865+ phones that I have, they all have increased power for the increased peak perf, with worse sustained performance. So in that regard it does look disappointing.Luminar - Friday, August 28, 2020 - link
How is this disappointing? I thought you anticipated this situation of more peak performance and more peak power.You said this would be the case in your first article about the 865+. You said the 865+ would hit >3.0GHz but the 865+ would be able to consume the same or less power, due to being able to do more work in less time thanks to higher frequencies.
Luminar - Friday, August 28, 2020 - link
Correction: *the same or less energy.Lolimaster - Sunday, August 30, 2020 - link
Increasing voltages, throwing aside efficiency. Phones can't simply comply with energy requirements using passive cooling, even if it's "liquid"