Camera - Low Light Evaluation

Low-light photography of the ROG Phone III is a wildcard. On one hand, the phone lacks OIS which is a big detriment to low-light photography, but on the other hand, the device has a potent sensor, wide aperture, and now also features a night mode that might be able to still produce good images.

Click for full image
[ ROG Phone III ]
[iPhone 11 Pro ] - [Galaxy S20+(E) ]
[ Pixel 4 ] - [ X-T30 ]

As expected, the non-night mode shots of the phone are quite disappointing and are considerably worse than the competition.

The ultra-wide here is also night unusable and in the same bottom-tier as the iPhone 11’s unit.

When turning on night mode however, which by the way is triggered to come on by default when under low-light conditions, there’s a dramatic improvement in quality and it becomes usable, although it still can’t compete with other phones which have OIS.

Click for full image
[ ROG Phone III ]
[ iPhone 11 Pro ] - [ Galaxy S20+(E) ]
[ Pixel 4 ] - [ X-T30 ]

I did like the ROG3’s exposure here as it was the most realistic of the bunch, however it lacked the higher dynamic range in the shadows of other phones.

Click for full image
[ ROG Phone III ]
[ iPhone 11 Pro ] - [ Galaxy S20+(E) ]
[ Pixel 4 ] - [ X-T30 ]

In brighter scenes, the ROG3 does ok, but the lack of OIS shows in the lack of detail, and the shot just has worse dynamic range than the competition, although it remains quite usable.

Click for full image
[ ROG Phone III ]
[ iPhone 11 Pro ] - [ Galaxy S20+(E) ]
[ Pixel 4 ] - [ X-T30 ]

Surprisingly enough this scene was to the liking of the ASUS as it produced an excellent result that although it a bit bright, has tone of good retention of textures and detail and is quite ahead of all other mobile phones.

Click for full image
[ ROG Phone III ]
[ iPhone 11 Pro ] - [ Galaxy S20+(E) ]
[ Pixel 4 ] - [ X-T30 ]

The darker the scene, the worse the ROG3 fares as its shutter speed can’t go as low as other phones. The S20 is able to get double the amount of light at 1/8th a second over 1/20th of the ASUS, and the iPhone ½ second exposure really shines.

Click for full image
[ ROG Phone III ]
[ iPhone 11 Pro ] - [ Galaxy S20+(E) ]
[ Pixel 4 ] - [ X-T30 ]

And in the last shot again, the much slower shutter speeds of the ROG3 mean that it captures a lot less light than the competition.

Overall Low-Light Evaluation: Meh

Generally, the ROG Phone III just suffers greatly from the lack of OIS. Although its night mode seems to perform quite adequately and be competitive in terms of computational photography, the fact that its shutter speeds are always around four times faster than the competition means that it’s only able to capture about a quarter of the light. It’s very clearly a tier below other flagship devices, and generally not competitive.

Camera - Daylight Evaluation Video Recording & Speaker Evaluation
Comments Locked

71 Comments

View All Comments

  • Medstar1 - Saturday, August 29, 2020 - link

    Personally I've never given wireless audio a try. I was first introduced to the Quad DAC on my LG V20 years ago and it made the headphone jack a part of my "must have" list for phones every since. Another reason may be the fact that when I listen to music I am stationary and not engaged in other activities. I don't listen to music when I'm out, say hiking, because it kind of nullifys the point of being out in nature. I don't do it while I'm out and about in the city because I want to be situationally aware of my surroundings at all times. So bottom line I just haven't found the need to go wireless at this stage.
  • habs01 - Saturday, August 29, 2020 - link

    Having a 3.5mm jack doesn't prevent you from using bluetooth if that's what you like. It doesn't work the other way around.
  • flyingpants265 - Sunday, August 30, 2020 - link

    You've given in to the inconvenience of Bluetooth, you mean.

    And you've given into the cost.
  • Red john - Sunday, August 30, 2020 - link

    The problem of wireless headset means you are required to charge a new gadget along with your mobile phone. And we can get better audio quality output with half of the price in wired than wireless headsets
  • flyingpants265 - Sunday, August 30, 2020 - link

    Not required. You can use USBC headphones. Just strongly encouraged by marketing.
  • s.yu - Wednesday, September 2, 2020 - link

    Required if you use magnetic charging cables, because your sole C port will be stuck with a magnetic adaptor in it.. And those sell pretty well, the market is expanding in fact.
  • s.yu - Wednesday, September 2, 2020 - link

    I can tell you that Sony's flagship overear is sorely inadequate and PHA55BT doesn't drive low impedance CIEMs as well as my phone with its integrated DAC through the 3.5mm. No BT earphone/headphone is known to surpass the former and no adaptor is known to surpass the latter. End of discussion.
  • hemedans - Friday, August 28, 2020 - link

    it has two usb type C ports, use one for wired type c earphone
  • Lord of the Bored - Saturday, August 29, 2020 - link

    But I want to use normal headphones, not my GBA SP toy phones.
  • flyingpants265 - Sunday, August 30, 2020 - link

    So buy an adapter to carry around everywhere and degrade your sound quality (noise etc from contacts/soldering/bad shielding)

    Remember to pay for that too.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now