Dual Core on the Horizon

So we lied originally - we have even better news. Dual core Smithfield processors, which are really nothing more than two Prescotts slapped together with independent caches, are scheduled to launch a little earlier than we originally claimed in previous roadmap articles. In fact, part of the push to launch so early seems to be to coincide with the 945/955 launch as those chipsets are the only ones to support the multiple core processors. Recall AMD's dual core launch strategy is to enable existing hardware (nForce4, K8T890, 8xxx) to run multiple cores. So while you can't plug a Smithfield into your existing 925X motherboard, it may be for the better. DDR2 has plenty of bandwidth to offer, but as we have seen in server benchmarks, multiple Pentium 4's competing on the memory bus can be quite slow. Dual core Pentium 4's might be horribly inefficient without DDR2-667, however that is another theory we can put to the test on launch day. If you look carefully, you'll see the Smithfields launching only at 800FSB. We find it slightly unusual that the entire 945/955 platform supports a front side bus speed that two $1000 SKUs utilize.

Intel Dual Core PerformanceDesktop Lineup LGA775
Processor Speed L2 Cache FSB Launch
Pentium 4 840 3.20GHz 2x1MB 800MHz Q2'05
Pentium 4 830 3.00GHz 2x1MB 800MHz Q2'05
Pentium 4 820 2.80GHz 2x1MB 800MHz Q2'05

Also note that the dual core processors on the desktop do not support HyperThreading. The server implementation of Smithfield, "Dempsey," has HyperThreading enabled. For database applications, this makes sense - although we have known for a long time that single threaded applications take a performance hit when a HyperThreading processor exclusively runs that program. Interestingly enough the Smithfield lineup has some very competitive price points according to the launch data. The 820, 830 and 840 models will launch at $241, $316 and $530 respectively - compare that to the Pentium 4 lineup today [RTPE: Pentium 4 775]. At today's prices that's only an $80 premium on the second core.

Single Core Processors Mobility Dual Core & Secret Stuff
Comments Locked

74 Comments

View All Comments

  • Palek - Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - link

    Kristopher,

    Are you sure you wanted to say "... Now we just need to see if AMD has enough up their SLEAZES ..." in the Final Thoughts section? :)
  • MasterYoda - Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - link

    So what's the difference between Cedar Mill and Presler?
  • IamTHEsnake - Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - link

    I am laughing now just thinking of all the AMD fanboys chanting and hailing "the death of intel" or the thought of intel going bankrupt. All these stupid threads in the forums suggesting AMD has finally won and will reign supreme forever just go to show how short-sighted and stupid some people are. NOW! Let the games begin!


    ...(sigh) good rant...

    I guess this happens everytime the ball is thrown back in the opposing company's half, so maybe I shouldn't let it bother me.

    Idiots will be idiots.
  • mikecel79 - Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - link

    Wow no comments yet? I'm surprised. Looks like Intel is waking up and pushing everything ahead. Looks to be an exciting year for them. It'll be interesting to see the thermal properties of the 2M Prescotts.

    I think there is something wrong with the Yonah table. All the speeds list 2.8Ghz for every model. A 2.8Ghz Pentium M with 2MB of cache. Can't wait to see that.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now