Single Core Desktop

Now for desktop processing; we have good news and better news. The good news is almost all desktop Prescotts (including the Celerons) will get a 64-bit makeover real soon. Unfortunately, you'll still need to buy a new processor but the roadmaps indicate there will be virtually no price premium on the 64-bit versions. With Windows XP 64-bit release less than a few months away, it makes sense that Intel's 64-bit push comes strong and hard in the 9th inning. We are particularly interested in how fully committed the roadmap details EM64T; even the puny Celerons get the instructions. You may recall that the Socket 754 Sempron processors are nearly identical to AMD's Athlon 64 processors with half the cache and the 64-bit instructions removed. It will be interesting to see how the two companies play this against each other as AMD will be the 32-bit SKU on the desktop when WinXP Pro x64 launches.

Just to detail the whole outline for 64-bit Socket 775 processors, here is a quick roadmap of what we have to look forward to:

Intel Single Core Mid Range Desktop Lineup LGA775
Processor Speed L2 Cache FSB Launch
Pentium 4 XE 3.73GHz 3.73GHz 2MB 1066MHz Soon
Pentium 4 XE 3.46GHz 3.43GHz 512KB 1066MHz Nov 2004
Pentium 4 571 3.80GHz 1MB 800MHz Q2'05
Pentium 4 561 3.60GHz 1MB 800MHz Q2'05
Pentium 4 551 3.40GHz 1MB 800MHz Q2'05
Pentium 4 541 3.20GHz 1MB 800MHz Q2'05
Pentium 4 531 3.00GHz 1MB 800MHz Q2'05
Pentium 4 521 2.80GHz 1MB 800MHz Q2'05
Celeron D 355 3.33GHz 256KB 533MHz Q4'05
Celeron D 351 3.20GHz 256KB 533MHz Q2'05
Celeron D 346 3.06GHz 256KB 533MHz Q2'05
Celeron D 341 2.93GHz 256KB 533MHz Q2'05
Celeron D 336 2.80GHz 256KB 533MHz Q2'05
Celeron D 331 2.66GHz 256KB 533MHz Q2'05
Celeron D 326 2.53GHz 256KB 533MHz Q2'05

As you can see, the EM64T enabled CPUs have incremented their model numbers by 1 relative to their non-EM64T counterparts. We're glad that Intel is making a clear distinction between the two variants, rather than simply adding a new suffix. Where there is no earlier part, like the 3.33GHz Celeron D, the model numbers do not have the +1.

The 3.73GHz Pentium 4 EE will show up real soon, if that's your thing, and it will become the second processor to support 1066FSB. We haven't been real impressed with the 1066FSB launch thus far, and a 300MHz bump in clock speed doesn't strike us as something that will revolutionize the performance desktop anytime soon either. However, keep in mind this new P4EE is very different from the previous 3.46GHz revision, and with a different core we may see a very different performance curve on the 1066MHz front side bus. The rest of the Intel roadmap neglects to mention any other 1066FSB processors, including the dual core behemoths, so the technology is either a little bit ahead of its time or simply a temporary dead end.

Next we have the great news. Not only will we see the launch of four Prescott 2M/Iriwindale processors next month, but soon after we will also get our first taste of Smithfield - several quarters ahead of what the previous roadmap had anticipated! Prescott 2M will launch with four SKUs listed below, along with a "670" model clocked at 3.8GHz sometime shortly after.

Intel Single Core Performance Desktop Lineup LGA775
Processor Speed L2 Cache FSB Launch
Pentium 4 670 3.80GHz 2MB 800MHz Q2'05
Pentium 4 660 3.60GHz 2MB 800MHz Q1'05
Pentium 4 650 3.40GHz 2MB 800MHz Q1'05
Pentium 4 640 3.20GHz 2MB 800MHz Q1'05

Like the other Prescott processors, Prescott 2M will launch with EM64T and XD, but it adds Enhanced Speed Step (EIST) as well. EIST is very similar to AMD's Cool n' Quiet as it dynamically ramps the clock speed of the processor to conserve thermals and power. However, the big difference between CnQ and EIST is maturity - EIST has existed in some form or another since the earliest days of the P6 architecture. How EIST will affect performance on everyday desktop processing - particularly on a processor with such a high clock speed - we leave for the actual launch date sometime next month.

Index Dual Core Desktop Processors
Comments Locked

74 Comments

View All Comments

  • danidentity - Wednesday, January 26, 2005 - link

    When are the new chipsets launching? Do we have an exact date? You say next month...as in February? That's earlier than I have been hearing.
  • Falloutboy - Wednesday, January 26, 2005 - link

    I have a feeling that dual core will be pretty hard to comeby from intel in the 2Q thier just doing it for marketing reasons because amd was shooting for 3Q.
  • footballfan - Wednesday, January 26, 2005 - link

    it could be that all a 925XE based motherboard needs to support dual core is a BIOS update...I'm hoping.

    That article didn't really specify that 925XE won't support dual core.

    I'm hoping I'm right.
  • ksherman - Wednesday, January 26, 2005 - link

    interesting how Intel current gen chipset wont support dual core... I thought that AMD's dual core only required a BIOS update, not a new chipset...
  • footballfan - Wednesday, January 26, 2005 - link

    When would motherboards with the new chipsets come out?
  • footballfan - Wednesday, January 26, 2005 - link

    Interesting developments.
    The 915 and 925X chipsets don't support dual core. So I'm guessing that the 925XE won't support dual core either.
  • KristopherKubicki - Wednesday, January 26, 2005 - link

    Palek: Sorry about that - I thought you were joking the first time around.

    Typos Happen :-X My bad.

    Kristopher
  • Regs - Wednesday, January 26, 2005 - link

    I agree with Darth. All I see is a revamp. Prescott is not going anywhere fast under 4.0 GHz. The Prescott needs a faster clock cycle for its larger pipeline. The die shrink made it possible for Intel to stick even more transistors onto the Prescott so it could be fitted wit a 2MB cache.


    AMD is doing just fine with the 90nm. I don't see A64 Winchesters soaking up the 12v rail @ 65c like the Prescott's.Intel needed it, AMD does not.

    JarredWalton, if you read, Intel had the most troubles out of them all last year trying to get their CPU's out onto the market. How many times was the Prescott delayed in 04'?
  • Illissius - Wednesday, January 26, 2005 - link

    Heh. I'm still waiting for a dual core, 3GHz Pentium M derivative with SSE3 (4, if they have it by then), x86-64, and an integrated dual channel 800MHz DDR2 (3?) memory controller.
    That would be the equivalent of what, a 30GHz Northwood Celeron? :D
  • Palek - Wednesday, January 26, 2005 - link

    Kristopher, forgive me for pointing this out again, but your very last sentence does say "sleazes" instead of "sleeves".

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now