Grand Theft Auto V

Now a truly venerable title, GTA V is a veteran of past game suites that is still graphically demanding as they come. As an older DX11 title, it provides a glimpse into the graphically intensive games of yesteryear that don't incorporate the latest features. Originally released for consoles in 2013, the PC port came with a slew of graphical enhancements and options. Just as importantly, GTA V includes a rather intensive and informative built-in benchmark, somewhat uncommon in open-world games.

The settings are identical to its previous appearances, which are custom as GTA V does not have presets. To recap, a "Very High" quality is used, where all primary graphics settings turned up to their highest setting, except grass, which is at its own very high setting. Meanwhile 4x MSAA is enabled for direct views and reflections. This setting also involves turning on some of the advanced rendering features - the game's long shadows, high resolution shadows, and high definition flight streaming - but not increasing the view distance any further.

Grand Theft Auto V - 1920x1080 - Very High Quality

Grand Theft Auto V - 2560x1440 - Very High Quality

Grand Theft Auto V - 99th PCTL - 1920x1080 - Very High Quality

Grand Theft Auto V - 99th PCTL - 2560x1440 - Very High Quality

The Division 2 Forza Horizon 4
Comments Locked

202 Comments

View All Comments

  • Qasar - Thursday, January 23, 2020 - link

    " nvidia drivers are near flawless " ha !!!!!!!!!!!! that's a good one. bias much cmdmonkey ??? as Korguz mentioned, you must have been very lucky, as for me, with both radeon and geforce, i have had issues with both over the years, but, that doesnt change my view on either, i buy what i can afford that gives the performance i am willing to pay for, and so far, that looks to be amd, and thats partly because i am sick of nvidia charging WAY to much for a video card, they must like pricing their cards so only the rich, or those with no families and mortgages, can buy them. i hope amd can do the same with the video cards, as they have with Zen. would be nice to see nvidia have to drop their prices by 800 or more like intel has had to do.
  • Spunjji - Thursday, January 23, 2020 - link

    Nvidia drivers have - in admittedly rare cases - actually destroyed cards. In more regular cases, they have bugs with setting resolutions, bugs with installation, and just the general sort of issues you'd expect from a large driver for complex hardware. They're no more immune from that than anyone else.

    This "AMD drives are baaaaad" trope will probably never die, but it'll never really be true either.
  • cmdrmonkey - Thursday, January 23, 2020 - link

    For the record I'd actually love to see AMD produce good video cards again. Everything they've made in recent years has been trash. They make loud, hot, power guzzling, underperforming cards with bad drivers that rarely get updated. That's why they are down to 11% market share. Their cards suck.
  • Qasar - Thursday, January 23, 2020 - link

    oh look, an opinion from some that that looks like they hare heavily bias against amd for what ever reason. while their video cards in recent years hasnt been that good, but to be fair, there HAS been years, where nvidias were just as bad, same with their drivers. i guess he LOVES paying WAY to much for nvidia's products and wants to keep overpaying... is it safe to assume you also like over paying for intels current products too ?? nvidia is getting lazy, just like intel, and who knows, maybe they will follow in intels footsteps too.....
  • cmdrmonkey - Thursday, January 23, 2020 - link

    I actually hate overpaying and I hate nVidia having a monopoly. I want AMD to pull their heads out of their butts and stop producing video cards that are trash.
  • Qasar - Thursday, January 23, 2020 - link

    amds cards aren't trash, they are still pretty good for the price, and with nvidia charging way to much for theirs, amds cards are still quite usable, and at least most of them are affordable.
  • cmdrmonkey - Thursday, January 23, 2020 - link

    AMD cards are poo. And they aren't cheap enough that anyone would pick them over nVidia equivalents that run cooler and quieter and have better drivers.
  • Qasar - Thursday, January 23, 2020 - link

    your opinions are poo, and is just your personal OPINION, thats all.. there is nothing wrong with amds cards, just like there is nothing wrong with nvidias, some have issues with one, and not the other, and vice versa, as i said, i have issues with both. still better then paying the ridiculous prices that nvidia charges, as i also mentioned.. nvidia is getting lazy, been at the top too long, and it will bite them in the ass, maybe with the next release of RDNA2, or heck.. maybe it will come out of left field with intel and the Xe cards who knows.. IMO, your bias against amd shows.... and i hope you keep buying nivida and paying for those over priced cards....
  • flyingpants265 - Thursday, January 23, 2020 - link

    Hahaha, this post is embarrassing, you should stop posting on Anandtech.
  • 335 GT - Friday, January 31, 2020 - link

    Why did the 5700xt win videocard of the year on the every site I saw? Shoo troll.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now