System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however, this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, but also the ability for the manufacturer to optimize USB speed, audio quality (based on audio codec), POST time and latency. This can come down to the manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

For X570 we are running using Windows 10 64-bit with the 1903 update as per our Ryzen 3000 CPU review.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single ASUS GTX 980 GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the Thermaltake 1200W power supply. This power supply has ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real-world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our testbed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power: Long Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: OS Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: Prime95 Blend (w/ GTX 980)

The ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Impact performs very competitively against other X570 models on test with good results at long idle, and idle power states. At full load, the Impact also performs well, sitting in the middle of the pack.

Non-UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.)

Non UEFI POST Time

In our POST time test, the Crosshair VIII Impact has the best for POST times out of all the X570 models we have tested so far. At default, it managed to post the joint-fastest time with 18.9 seconds, and the fastest time with non-critical controllers disabled with a time of 17.5 seconds.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

We test the DPC at the default settings straight from the box, and the ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Impact did well with a latency time of 128.2 ms. 

Board Features, Test Bed and Setup CPU Performance, Short Form
Comments Locked

59 Comments

View All Comments

  • gamer1000k - Monday, October 28, 2019 - link

    Maybe, but most GPUs are still longer than mini-ITX/DTX motherboards are wide and about the same width as micro-ATX, so a lot of cases will need the extra length for the GPU anyways.
  • NanakiEmi - Monday, October 28, 2019 - link

    "the truth is that the mini-DTX size does cancel out any mini-ITX chassis designs, causing the user to look at micro-ATX cases."

    I'm sorry but I completly disagree with this. I have been waiting for years for Mini-DTX to take off. If you look at most enthusiast ITX cases they are designed for a dual slot GPU. There is nobody who is taking this motherboard and using a basic single slot graphics card.

    The extra motherboard space is using the wasted space under the GPU for more features and it makes perfect sence. It it not any wider than ITX is.

    Asus even recessed the lower board connctors slightly and made them at right angles to fit your front panel / usb cables in within most ITX case designs.

    Frankly this is shody reporting and a complete misunderstanding of the differnce between Mini-ITX and Mini-DTX
  • KESM - Sunday, March 22, 2020 - link

    I agree. I’m going to use this mobo in a Lian Li TU150WX case. This Li Lian ITX case will work with a DTX mobo. Like all mobos you have to bear the responsibility to match the case with the mobo; it’s no different with this mobo or any mobo.

    I also don’t get the cost argument. If you don’t see value in this board then don’t purchase it. It’s an enthusiast mobo; not targeted for folks seeking a value/economy class mobo.

    And finally; you don’t have to have reasoning to purchase it. I just love the way it looks and the fact that it has a riser M2 board and isolation for audio. It offers much in a small form factor. One can elect to purchase any mobo for a variety of reasons.
  • WaltC - Wednesday, November 6, 2019 - link

    Very happy with my Aorus Master x570 that rings the bell @ ~$350; It's been practically problem-free since July 9, when I installed it, through every bios flash GB has put up for download, both beta and official. What I've read suggests that Asus isn't maybe as popular as it once was years ago, and that the quality of the x570 mboards is lacking--but take that with a huge grain of salt as I have no Asus x570 mboards around and haven't used any of them myself.
  • umano - Tuesday, November 19, 2019 - link

    This is a great board but with thunderbolt 3 it would have been almost perfect

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now