Video Recording

Video recording on the iPhone is known to be extraordinarily good in terms of quality. The iPhone 11 series is said to improve in this regard thanks to an improved HDR with more dynamic range (though Apple still stores video in SDR format). Naturally of course what’s also exciting is that we’re now able to capture video with a wide-angle lens, and seeing a lot more content of a given scene.


  
  

Apple has improved the EIS this generation, and it now results in a much smoother video capture experience than the past iterations. When you have with a lot of detail in a scene though, you can sometimes see the jitter caused by the OIS and EIS interacting with each other.

In the wide-angle recording, the EIS was a bit haphazard. In the first part of the video walking down the path it doesn’t look to be stabilizing much at all, when I turn left to the second path suddenly the EIS kicked in and things were a lot less shaky, and it then again loses the stabilization for few steps until it finally resumes again. This happened all three recordings with the wide-angle camera, and I don’t know it was me holding the phone any different between those two paths.

The quality and detail of the videos are all great. The one thing noticed though is that there’s the occasional exposure flicker in some areas. In effect Apple here is doing two exposures per frame and combining them together like Smart HDR – we can notice that in parts of the scene, and most visible the sky is flickering or pulsing in brightness.

The handling between the three camera sensors is very good, it’s particularly fast and seamless to switch between the main and wide-angle modules, while there’s a small delay to switch to the telephoto module. Switching between the three modules is only possible in 30fps recording modes; it’s still possible to record 60fps in any of the three modules but you have to start out the video with the camera that you want to use, and you’ll be limited to digital zooming only while recording.

Speaker Evaluation

In terms of audio for the iPhone 11 series, Apple’s big addition is the inclusion of Dolby Atmos. Naturally you have to watch multi-channel audio content to be able to take advantage of the feature. For regular stereo audio playback, we investigate if Apple has done any changes to the speaker setup and if it differs to that of the XS.

Speaker Loudness

In terms of audio volume, the iPhone 11 Pro is ever so slightly quieter when being held in portrait mode. The bigger difference that’s definitely more audible is when holding the phone in landscape mode with both hands and the palms cupped – the usual way one would hold a phone in landscape. Here it’s 3dB quieter than the iPhone XS, which is a noticeable amount.

Speaker Stereo Bias

Investigating the phone’s stereo bias thanks to a binaural microphone setup, we see that that things have notably regressed for the iPhone 11 Pro when compared to the XS. It’s relatively normal for the main speaker (Right side) to appear louder, however it’s extremely weird that it’s now 1.6dB more biased than on the iPhone XS. Indeed when comparing the 11 Pro and XS side-by-side, and muting the main speaker by holding a finger on it, volume being equal and otherwise calibrated between the two phones, it’s immediately audible that the 11 Pro earpiece speaker is much quieter compared to what we experience on the XS.

This has a rather large knock-on effect on the spatial sound reproduction of the 11 Pro as it just isn’t able to fill up the surrounding area quite as well as on the XS.

Looking at the frequency response between the 11 Pro and the XS, we see that things are extremely similar up to the high mid-ranges, with a more noticeable peak at 95Hz for the 11 Pro. Towards the treble we see some more deviations, it’s here that the 11 Pro is a bit quieter and I think that’s due to the weaker earpiece speaker.

Overall, the sound signature of the iPhone 11 Pro hasn’t changed all too much, and it is actually more of a downgrade in audio playback due to the weaker earpiece speaker calibration. The Galaxy S10’s notably stronger lower mid-range and mid-range still make for a much superior audio playback and is in my experience the device to beat in terms of speaker quality.

Camera - Low Light Evaluation Conclusion & End Remarks
Comments Locked

242 Comments

View All Comments

  • lmcd - Wednesday, October 16, 2019 - link

    Dunno what this is supposed to mean. Given how well Qualcomm chips do with Windows and the superior performance of Apple vs Qualcomm, you're really just spouting nonsense.
  • joms_us - Wednesday, October 16, 2019 - link

    Where is superiority you say? These apps does what Spec or GB does and yet iPhone A11 is not showing desktop-level performance here versus OP7

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ic8q1kPseVE

    It is even laughable that this iPhone 11 is not faster than the older iPhone XS

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-P0KRlbH1M

    If A13 is truly superior than some desktop processors, why are we not seeing/hearing anything it replacing processors inside MBP? I am sure Apple can port it easily to Windows or Linux if they wanted to.
  • lmcd - Wednesday, October 16, 2019 - link

    Did you actually just link GUI/responsiveness hand-testing videos? Why do you think those add anything to the conversation? Arguing about the performance of a given GUI library tells us nothing about the SoCs involved.

    A13 is truly superior to some binnings of laptop-class processors running at nearly 10x its power consumption. That's why it or a larger version of it (a future A13X) will run in a future iPad Pro that should perform in the same class as the Surface Pro 7 and Surface Pro X.

    Yea, it won't win versus the top models. But it'll certainly beat the lower-end Pro 7, with an anemic i3. And that includes single-core performance.

    So yea, it wouldn't be the top desktop processor, but it certainly can and will scale up to "desktop-class performance." It doesn't scale up to a premium experience at a desktop level yet, so there's no place for it yet in the Apple desktop product stack.
  • Diogene7 - Wednesday, October 16, 2019 - link

    On a personal basis, I am much more interested by 1. fanless computers and 2. responsiveness (latency) over raw peak performance for a future laptop or even desktop computer as I am mostly using my computer to surf the web / watch videos.

    That is the reason I really, really like the idea of Qualcomm 8cx processor as in the Samsung Galaxy book S : Quiet laptop (no fan), thin, light, excellent battery life... The unknow is responsiveness : will the performance be good enough that lag won’t be felt more than a standard Intel / AMD laptop ?

    If the responsiveness of a Qualcomm 8cx / future Apple A14 is good enough, then a fanless laptop, but also a fanless desktop has much, much appeal to myself !!!

    If I was Apple, I would try to introduce ARM mac computers with both an Apple A14 / Apple A15 in combination with Storage Class Memory (SCM) to get never seen before low latency (excellent responsiveness) fanless mac computers : sure it would maybe take more time to do some intensive tasks on those computers (ex: video editing), but basic day to day task (launching Safari,...) would feel soooo much faster (like using a SSD everything faster compare to a mechanical HDD).
  • WinterCharm - Wednesday, October 16, 2019 - link

    ARM macs are coming in 2020.

    You will see these chips in a mac. With active cooling they are going to DESTROY anything Intel and AMD have to offer.
  • Alistair - Wednesday, October 16, 2019 - link

    These tests we are looking at are occurring at 2.6Ghz for the A13. And it is basically equal to the 4Ghz+ 9900k. Imagine the A13 running at 3.5Ghz, I think it already surpasses Intel easily enough.
  • joms_us - Wednesday, October 16, 2019 - link

    Nonsense, show us proof or it did not happen. Even a mere 2Ghz Ryzen is faster than any smartphone today.
  • Alistair - Wednesday, October 16, 2019 - link

    The iPhone uses 2 fast cores. Yes, it is equal to a dual core Ryzen or a dual core Intel CPU. I want Intel to be faster, but that would have required them to do ANYTHING meaningful since the i7-2700k came out instead of just repackaging the same CPU over and over.
  • WinterCharm - Thursday, October 17, 2019 - link

    The proof is right on page 4 of this article, or did you not read it?
  • joms_us - Wednesday, October 16, 2019 - link

    Crossing my fingers, I will be happy even if I can just drag and file my files here and there or perhaps compile my x86 apps. =D

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now