System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however, this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, but also the ability for the manufacturer to optimize USB speed, audio quality (based on audio codec), POST time and latency. This can come down to the manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

For X570 we are running using Windows 10 64-bit with the 1903 update as per our Ryzen 3000 CPU review.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single ASUS GTX 980 GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the Thermaltake 1200W power supply. This power supply has ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real-world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our testbed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power: Long Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: OS Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: Prime95 Blend (w/ GTX 980)

The ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB3 is one of the better performers in our power consumption testing with a strong showing in all three of our tests. A smaller PCB tends to equate to fewer controllers and circuitry and can have an impact on this. With the most inefficient designs on the smaller form factor models getting found out very quickly, the ASRock X570 mini-ITX is highly competitive.

Non-UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.)

Non UEFI POST Time

In our POST testing, ASRock tends to field some of the best times in every platform and the X570 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB3 is no different in this regard. It posted a competitive default POST time of just over 25 seconds which in comparison to the next board above this, the GIGABYTE X570 Aorus Xtreme which has a marginally slower POST time of 25.6 seconds. With controllers stripped down to the bare necessities, we managed to shave a further 1.6 seconds off the overall time it takes to load up Windows 10 on our testbed.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

We test the DPC at the default settings straight from the box, and the ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB3 performed very well as expected. ASRock desktop models tend to have the upper hand in out of the box DPC latency performance, and this board continues that trend comfortably.

Board Features, Test Bed and Setup CPU Performance, Short Form
Comments Locked

64 Comments

View All Comments

  • DanaGoyette - Thursday, October 10, 2019 - link

    I'll bet nobody buys micro ATX partly because all the micro ATX boards are crippled in things such as audio codec (enjoy your ALC887), Ethernet (yay Realtek), or in Asrock's case, poor VRM efficiency.

    Nobody buys because there are no good boards, no good boards because nobody buys.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Thursday, October 10, 2019 - link

    I remembre when there were tons of micro ATX chioces, the gigabyte snimer M.3, the asus boards, ece.

    Even intel only has two good micro ATX boards, both from asus. Nothing from gigabyte, nothing good from MSI or ASrock. At least the TUF micro has a good audio chip (Realtek ALC S1200A) and intel NIC.
  • Jasmij - Wednesday, October 9, 2019 - link

    Throughout the review I see much talk about Thunderbolt but benchmarks are missing.
    This board failed certification by Intel.
    https://thunderbolttechnology.net/products?tid=15&...

    Can we get some Thunderbolt compatablity and speed tests?
  • DCide - Wednesday, October 9, 2019 - link

    I would like to see tests too, but I don’t see how this motherboard “failed certification” simply by being absent from a list where the newest motherboard I could find was the 2018 Z390 Designare.
  • jeremyshaw - Wednesday, October 9, 2019 - link

    Also, didn't Intel already open standard Thunderbolt? They may not be in charge of certification anymore.
  • DCide - Wednesday, October 9, 2019 - link

    Yes, they did - right about the time the list appears to have stopped growing!
  • jab701 - Thursday, October 10, 2019 - link

    FYI, they are still in charge of certification.

    If you want to use the thunderbolt logo on your device you *have* to pass certification.

    I read that even though USB 4 (or is it USB4) will integrate thunderbolt, if you wish to use the thunderbolt logo it will *still* have to pass intels certification process. This sounds a bit dodgey but if you think about it, I would rather be sure my graphics card enclosure is going to work properly.

    Given The number of USB device out there which *apparently* conform to the USB standard but do not interoperate properly, I would say that USB certification might not be stringent enough.

    (I say this as an Electronic Engineer who has found numerous issues getting kit to work together properly in systems I design and use as part of my job).
  • Cooe - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link

    This is so freaking false I don't even know where to begin. To legally put the official Thunderbolt logo & branding on ANY for sale product, it MUST pass Intel's certification process. This is a certified board, regardless of what you've read. In fact, it's the major price tag that comes with this certification process for all non-Intel hardware that has kept Thunderbolt off AMD (in an officially supported capacity) until this point (Intel waives the certification fee on products w/ Intel CPU's).

    This is made explicitly clear with the fact that unofficially Thunderbolt 3 works just fine (w/ the Titan Ridge PCIe card) on most all other AM4 as well as X399 boards (with the small exception of device hot swap support not working), but w/o said pricey certification this isn't an "officially" supported setup.
  • andychow - Wednesday, October 9, 2019 - link

    "a DisplayPort 1.4 input for users looking to drive multiple displays with resolutions of up to 4K from a discrete graphics card". How???

    The DP goes from your discrete graphic card into the motherboard. Then what?
  • jeremyshaw - Wednesday, October 9, 2019 - link

    It is for TB3.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now