Camera - Daylight Evaluation

The camera performance of the Black Shark 2 is something that in theory should be extremely similar to the Xiaomi Mi9 – both phones are after all from the same vendor and employ the same camera sensor and similar optics. The one area where the BS2 differs in is that its secondary camera is just a regular 2x telephoto lens in a year where most vendors have opted to prioritise wide-angle modules.

I have to apologise for the vendor label on the photos of the BS2 – I hadn’t realised it was enabled until after I had captured the camera shots.

Click for full image
[ BlackShark 2 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9 ] - [ G8 ]
[ Reno 10x ] -  [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

In the first shot, the results actually start out quite disappointing as there’s a massive difference to the result of the Mi9. The BS2’s shot has completely wrong colour temperature and the whole scene is far too grey – a common issue with this scene that I’ve encountered with a lost of phones in past reviews.

While exposure and highlight retention seems similar, the BS2 seems to darken the shadows more than the Mi9.

The zoom lens photo in this shot is weird as it doesn’t look like it used the telephoto sensor at all, and it just looks like a crop of the main sensor with all of its disadvantages.

Click for full image
[ BlackShark 2 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9 ] - [ G8 ]
[ Reno 10x ] [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

This next shot again shows very dark shadows. Looking at the EXIF, the BS2’s exposure was one fourth as long as the Mi9’s, resulting that the top 15% of levels in the image are just nonexistant.

On the zoom shot, the BS2 this time around did use its dedicated sensor. Colour temperature this time around was better than the Mi9, and exposure is also ok. When looking at details though we’re seeing very different results as the BS2 is visibly employing a contrast and sharpening filter while the Mi9 remains natural.

Click for full image
[ BlackShark 2 ] -  [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9 ] - [G8 ]
[ Reno 10x ] - [ BlackShark 2 ] -  [ RedMagic 3 ]
[ Pixel 3 ]

On the main camera here in the flowers the BS2 does actually a lot better than the Mi9 due to more accurate colour temperature and a lot more preserved detail. Even though both cameras showcase the same image brightness in terms of levels, the BS2’s exposure here is at 1/500th second while the Mi9 was at 1/192th second. The lack of OIS on both phones would favour the faster exposure due to less shaking, and I think that’s possibly why the BS2 looks to have retained a lot more detail.

On the zoom module we again see that the BS2 employs a heavy contrast and sharpening filter, which does bring out the edges in objects, however it also blurs out finer low-contrast detail.

Click for full image
[ BlackShark 2 ] -  [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9 ] - [G8 ]
[ Reno 10x ] - [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] [ iPhone XS ]

The BS2 didn’t fare well here in this shot as it’s far too underexposed in favour of the sky. Details in the scene is also quite decimated as it’s blurry and it looks washed out, there’s a huge difference to the Mi9 here.

The zoom shot is also a bit underexposed, but the bigger issue is again the sharpness filter that manages to blur together all the detail in the foreground grass.

Click for full image
[ BlackShark 2 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ] - [ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ]
[ Mi9 ] - [ G8 ] - [ Reno 10x ] - [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

In this last indoor shot the BS2 gets a lot more detail than the Mi9 due to the much lower ISO used. The problem is that the shot looks quite unnatural and with far too much contrast with the shadows being extremely pronounced.

Daylight Camera Conclusion

On paper, the Black Shark 2 should have been a good performer in daylight and essentially it just had to match what the Mi9 had to offer in terms of processing. Unfortunately, that’s not the case and the two phones have relatively little in common other than they share very similar camera hardware. The BS2 wasn’t able to showcase the same positive characteristics as its sibling device, and is simply just worse in almost every scenario. The telephoto lens was also very different in terms of results, and showcased a very detrimental contrast and sharpening filter that blurred out finer details of the scene in favour of lower-resolution high contrast detail. It’s good for thumbnails or medium resolution shots, but not good if you want the actual full resolution of the camera.

Battery Life Camera - Low Light Evaluation
Comments Locked

63 Comments

View All Comments

  • Flunk - Wednesday, September 25, 2019 - link

    I'd take "gaming" phones more seriously if they actually had better hardware instead of just having obnoxious styling like this thing. I feel like that won't happen because of the way SoCs are developed, so we'll just see more of these cynical products.
  • wrkingclass_hero - Thursday, September 26, 2019 - link

    So it has finally come to paid reviews... this will not end well
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Thursday, September 26, 2019 - link

    It will end come Monday.
  • Galcobar - Thursday, September 26, 2019 - link

    Xiaomi might agree with your sentiment, since Qualcomm paid for a review which called out deceptive practices, poor design, and significant under-performance by a Qualcomm client. Clearly, the payment did not include guarantees of positive coverage or control over the published results. Xiaomi is probably wishing this review hadn't happened, but it does seem to establish the Independence of Anandtech editorial staff to publish a negative review even when sponsored.
  • PeachNCream - Thursday, September 26, 2019 - link

    Pretty much this stuff. It's really hard to question AT's integrity with this particular paid review given the results do not paint the phone in question in a very good light. Will that always be the case? Dunno, but I think probably, yes it will.
  • Imran-Shaikh - Thursday, September 26, 2019 - link

    What benefits AT had through these paid reviews?
    Money or anything else?
    Thanks in advance.
  • Badelhas - Thursday, September 26, 2019 - link

    What do you mean?
  • Average James - Friday, September 27, 2019 - link

    I just ran Slingshot Extreme Unlimited on my own BlackShark 2 with explicitly turned off thermal throttling and maximum speed setting [4] as Gamer Studio allows to tune the option.

    With GPU overlocked via Caller hidden menu, I marked 7100~ish Graphics and 4100-ish Physics which seems legit to its clock setting. While that, the temp marked through 35~38C.

    And then, I voluntary set Gamer Studio level to [2] which actively uses Silver Cores for battery and heats for non-3D heavy games. the result is similar to the article.

    So I wonder, Mr. Andrei might misunderstood about CPU/GPU governor stuff. On Auto setting, it seems natural that SW detects what kind of game or apps which requires how much 3D/CPU power to get most favorable results. Like nowdays modern VGA drivers are doing.
  • Average James - Friday, September 27, 2019 - link

    I can understand you're blaming detecting benchmarks software to turn off thermal throttling as a reviewer. It's generally evil thing to trick customers. BUT this device offers various performance levels through it's exclusive Gamer Studio menu and even allows to set thermal throttling level if you want.

    So what I cannot get from your article is, it doesn't talk about it's real performance. This is just complaining about "Poor performance in Auto perf setting if an App is not registered properly as it uses lower performance (seems level 2) level."
  • s.yu - Friday, September 27, 2019 - link

    "if an App is not registered properly"
    If "real" performance mandates that apps "register" properly, how can you ensure that every game is registered properly then, if "registration" doesn't depend on a load detection?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now