Camera - Low Light Evaluation

We’ve had the Reno 10x in camera comparisons in previous articles, but as mentioned in the introduction of the device, Oppo was able to update its software over the last few months. The one area where there has been significant advancements in is in terms of low-light photograph and an apparent new night mode.

Previously, the original Night mode on the Reno was a dedicated mode one had to select to use. In newer firmware updates, the Reno now will automatically select a new kind of night mode in lower light conditions, and this is characterised by the camera app doing three quick shutter animations and sounds. We’ll see how this has changed, and how the new mode compares against the competition.

Click for full image
[ BlackShark 2 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9
[ G8 ] - [ Reno 10x ] - [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ]

As expected, this first shot isn’t any good, albeit it does a little bit better than the Mi9’s auto mode. The problem here is that it’s just a tier below any other newer phone out there with better camera sensors, OIS, or night modes.

Click for full image
[ BlackShark 2 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9 ]
[ G8 ] - [ Reno 10x ] - [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ]

The next shot is again a disappointing blurry mess. I’d like to point out the result of the Red Magic 3 here – that phone uses the same camera sensor again and it also lacks OIS, both being gaming phones. Yet the RM3 managed to have a significantly better image that is much sharper.

Click for full image
[ BlackShark 2 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9
[ G8 ] - [ Reno 10x ] [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ]

Here we again see the same results. The BS2 ends up as the worst result amongst the line-up by quite a significant margin, and again I want to point out the differences to the RM3 that is leagues ahead even though both have almost the same hardware.

Click for full image
[ BlackShark 2 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9
[ G8 ] - [ Reno 10x ] - 
[ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ]

I was actually surprised to see the BS2 get in as much light as it did here in this shot as it’s extremely dim.

Click for full image
[ BlackShark 2 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9 ]
[ G8 ] - [ Reno 10x ] [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ]

Lastly, in this indoor low light shot, the BS2 couldn’t focus and the picture is largely unusable.

Low-light Conclusion - Also Terrible

The low-light conclusion for the BS2 doesn’t differ to much of that of the Mi9 – they’re both terrible at it. The situation for the BS2 is even more dire than that of the Mi9 as it doesn’t offer a dedicated Night Mode to at least attempt to capture more light and at least be able to produce images fit for social media.

I understand gaming phones aren’t camera oriented, but Xiaomi at least could have put the effort to just copy the camera processing from its main flagships for the Black Shark 2. As it is, it’s just pretty much unusable.

Camera - Daylight Evaluation Conclusion & End Remarks
Comments Locked

63 Comments

View All Comments

  • Jon Tseng - Wednesday, September 25, 2019 - link

    Thanks interesting. I guess that definitely answers the question as to whether the paid Qualcomm partnership had any impact on your ratings (not that it would, knowing AT, I know!).
  • PaulHoule - Wednesday, September 25, 2019 - link

    What I found strange about the article is that, unlike most reviews of gaming hardware, there were not any benchmarks for games.

    Maybe that's because nobody cares how many frames per second you can render Candy Crush which is why they pack it in with Windows so Intel can claim there is a "game" you can play with the integrated graphics.

    If there aren't any games that need a gaming phone, why does a gaming phone have to exist? It's like the sound of one hand clapping. isn't it?
  • Death666Angel - Wednesday, September 25, 2019 - link

    I mean, there area pretty intensive games for smartphones out there, think PUBG, Fortnite, racing games. I don't really know if they provide accurate/useful ingame benchmarks and I don't know if there are any FRAPS / FCAT like apps for Android. I don't think we get anything better than 3DMark and GFXBench right now. :) Everything else is non repeatable and therefore of little use.
  • PeachNCream - Wednesday, September 25, 2019 - link

    Pretty sure the decision to include Candy Crush is between Microsoft and King. It isn't a decision related to Intel. After all AMD based Windows systems ship with it preloaded as well.
  • crimson117 - Wednesday, September 25, 2019 - link

    I think benchmarks were omitted because "the firmware detects benchmarks and disables thermal throttling in order to get better scores." So benchmarks would be meaningless and misleading.
  • s.yu - Wednesday, September 25, 2019 - link

    Generally Anandtech's benchmarks should be immune to detection, which is stated in the article.
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Thursday, September 26, 2019 - link

    Yes, we bypassed detection for the published scores.
  • raghusa - Wednesday, September 25, 2019 - link

    AT was always one of my go to place to get in-depth analysis and reviews. Now that AT is going with PAID partnership route, my view of AT analysis is definitely going to change, will likely look for other reputable sources ....
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Thursday, September 26, 2019 - link

    The review content is still fully independently written, and the editorial team including myself have no contact with the sponsor in this regard. In any case this series will come to a closure on Monday.
  • Wardrive86 - Thursday, September 26, 2019 - link

    I wish that it was not coming to an end! I very much enjoyed this series.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now