Camera - Daylight Evaluation

The camera performance of the Black Shark 2 is something that in theory should be extremely similar to the Xiaomi Mi9 – both phones are after all from the same vendor and employ the same camera sensor and similar optics. The one area where the BS2 differs in is that its secondary camera is just a regular 2x telephoto lens in a year where most vendors have opted to prioritise wide-angle modules.

I have to apologise for the vendor label on the photos of the BS2 – I hadn’t realised it was enabled until after I had captured the camera shots.

Click for full image
[ BlackShark 2 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9 ] - [ G8 ]
[ Reno 10x ] -  [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

In the first shot, the results actually start out quite disappointing as there’s a massive difference to the result of the Mi9. The BS2’s shot has completely wrong colour temperature and the whole scene is far too grey – a common issue with this scene that I’ve encountered with a lost of phones in past reviews.

While exposure and highlight retention seems similar, the BS2 seems to darken the shadows more than the Mi9.

The zoom lens photo in this shot is weird as it doesn’t look like it used the telephoto sensor at all, and it just looks like a crop of the main sensor with all of its disadvantages.

Click for full image
[ BlackShark 2 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9 ] - [ G8 ]
[ Reno 10x ] [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

This next shot again shows very dark shadows. Looking at the EXIF, the BS2’s exposure was one fourth as long as the Mi9’s, resulting that the top 15% of levels in the image are just nonexistant.

On the zoom shot, the BS2 this time around did use its dedicated sensor. Colour temperature this time around was better than the Mi9, and exposure is also ok. When looking at details though we’re seeing very different results as the BS2 is visibly employing a contrast and sharpening filter while the Mi9 remains natural.

Click for full image
[ BlackShark 2 ] -  [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9 ] - [G8 ]
[ Reno 10x ] - [ BlackShark 2 ] -  [ RedMagic 3 ]
[ Pixel 3 ]

On the main camera here in the flowers the BS2 does actually a lot better than the Mi9 due to more accurate colour temperature and a lot more preserved detail. Even though both cameras showcase the same image brightness in terms of levels, the BS2’s exposure here is at 1/500th second while the Mi9 was at 1/192th second. The lack of OIS on both phones would favour the faster exposure due to less shaking, and I think that’s possibly why the BS2 looks to have retained a lot more detail.

On the zoom module we again see that the BS2 employs a heavy contrast and sharpening filter, which does bring out the edges in objects, however it also blurs out finer low-contrast detail.

Click for full image
[ BlackShark 2 ] -  [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9 ] - [G8 ]
[ Reno 10x ] - [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] [ iPhone XS ]

The BS2 didn’t fare well here in this shot as it’s far too underexposed in favour of the sky. Details in the scene is also quite decimated as it’s blurry and it looks washed out, there’s a huge difference to the Mi9 here.

The zoom shot is also a bit underexposed, but the bigger issue is again the sharpness filter that manages to blur together all the detail in the foreground grass.

Click for full image
[ BlackShark 2 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ] - [ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ]
[ Mi9 ] - [ G8 ] - [ Reno 10x ] - [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

In this last indoor shot the BS2 gets a lot more detail than the Mi9 due to the much lower ISO used. The problem is that the shot looks quite unnatural and with far too much contrast with the shadows being extremely pronounced.

Daylight Camera Conclusion

On paper, the Black Shark 2 should have been a good performer in daylight and essentially it just had to match what the Mi9 had to offer in terms of processing. Unfortunately, that’s not the case and the two phones have relatively little in common other than they share very similar camera hardware. The BS2 wasn’t able to showcase the same positive characteristics as its sibling device, and is simply just worse in almost every scenario. The telephoto lens was also very different in terms of results, and showcased a very detrimental contrast and sharpening filter that blurred out finer details of the scene in favour of lower-resolution high contrast detail. It’s good for thumbnails or medium resolution shots, but not good if you want the actual full resolution of the camera.

Battery Life Camera - Low Light Evaluation
Comments Locked

63 Comments

View All Comments

  • s.yu - Thursday, September 26, 2019 - link

    I'm quite aware of people who never go for the achievements. When my cousin plays Kingdom Rush he DOESN'T EVEN GO FOR ALL 3 STARS.
    The horror! It's like eating an apple with two or three random bites then throwing away all the rest!
  • StormyParis - Wednesday, September 25, 2019 - link

    Reviewing stuff as part of a for-pay arrangement must require very high-level mental, ethics, ... jiu-jitsu. I'm not sure how long the partnership w/Qualcomm will last, but, as a reader, thanks for the heads up.
  • IUU - Wednesday, September 25, 2019 - link

    They are trying to imitate Apple. Too much fluff, so people believe they buy a superior device(it is the price too).
    So they hope they can make some profit out of thin air.
    I hope you should be critical of the iphones in this fashion as well.
    They allocate a bigger amount of transistors to the faster cores , so they
    can claim supremacy, no matter the fact that on general cpu performance
    they are about the same.
    No matter that their gpu is anemic and nowhere near snapdragons.
  • melgross - Thursday, September 26, 2019 - link

    Exactly what fluff are you talking about?

    You really are deliberately ignorant.
  • edsib1 - Wednesday, September 25, 2019 - link

    Another phone review where the benchmarks are all wrong. Put the phone in game mode - it is easily in the top 5 855 based phones in terms of gaming performance.
  • cfenton - Wednesday, September 25, 2019 - link

    But is that because it cheats and runs without any thermal limitations when it's in game mode? Personally, I don't want my phone getting hot enough to be uncomfortable to hold.
  • edsib1 - Wednesday, September 25, 2019 - link

    But it doesnt get hot. They run at full tilt and dont throttle.

    Read the other reviews on the internet about these phones. It is Anandtech that is out of step with the other sites.

    The gaming phones are basically running in saver mode - unless you turn game mode on.

    Exactly the same problem with the review of the Oppo Reno 10x zoom....
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Wednesday, September 25, 2019 - link

    > But it doesnt get hot. They run at full tilt and dont throttle.

    I already demonstrated that's not what happens.

    > Exactly the same problem with the review of the Oppo Reno 10x zoom....

    What's the problem? That phone didn't throttle. It had a performance mode but that's essentially just a cheating button and running all frequencies pegged at max.
  • edsib1 - Thursday, September 26, 2019 - link

    Game mode is not a cheating mode if the phone can maintain that speed. If you run CPU throttle on the Oppo for over 10mins the phone maintains a very high score with game mode engaged (around 15% higher than without).

    The Exynos 9820 on the other hard throttles hard after a couple of minutes losing about 25% performance.

    So why would the game mode that doesnt throttle be more of a cheat mode than the 9820 which throttles hard?
  • edsib1 - Thursday, September 26, 2019 - link

    Reviewing a gaming phone without using gaming mode is like testing an Audi RS6 without putting it into sport mode - pointless.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now