Conclusion & End Remarks

The Xiaomi Mi9 was one of the missing flagship phones that was eager to cover this year but hadn’t had the chance to till now. Overall, I’m glad to have been able to test the device even though it’s later in the year, and it did reveal it’s still quite the good overall package and offers excellent value.

Design-wise, I actually do love the Mi9 simply because of its ergonomics that I find impeccable and extremely comfortable. Even though the phone’s screen is among the larger diameters at 6.39”, it very much feels like a smaller phone thanks to its very thin side-frame. The device is also relatively light for its size, comparable with what Samsung is able to offer in terms of size-weight ratio.

The display is very good and on par of what you’d expect of an AMOLED screen, offering excellent contrast and Xiaomi allows the panel to also get plenty bright. Colour calibration is also quite acceptable, being not great, but terrible. It should very much satisfy the vast majority of users.

Performance of the Mi9 is excellent thanks to the Snapdragon 855 SoC the company chose to employ in the phone. CPU and GPU performance that the phone is able to deliver is just beyond anything else that’s currently available in its price class, very much a Xiaomi tradition.

Battery life of the Mi9 is relatively average – the comparatively smaller 3300mAh battery capacity of the phone loses out to other devices which are in the 4000mAh class. On the other hand, Xiaomi also offers wireless charging in the Mi9, which is a bonus for quickly topping off every now and then, and the phone package bundles in an 18W charger.

In terms of cameras, the Xiaomi Mi9 surely offers a good amount versatility thanks to its triple-camera setup.

I found Xiaomi’s post-processing to be among one of the better ones out there, producing some of the best results out of the IMX586 sensor amongst the countless vendors and devices out there with the similar hardware setup. The wide-angle and zoom modules were also extremely competitive in daylight, producing sharp photos with competitive compositions.

Unfortunately, where the cameras completely fall apart in the Mi9 is low-light photography and video. The lack of OIS on even the main sensor of the phone is deadly, and the cameras just aren’t able to produce useable results. Xiaomi offers a Night Mode to help along with things and it does improve the situation, however the phone still remains plainly uncompetitive in terms of picture quality.

Other compromises of the Mi9 is in the audio department, although with a similar earpiece speaker setup as the OnePlus 7, the Mi9 lacks stereo playback and just has to rely on the bottom speaker.

Xiaomi is able to offer the Mi9 at such a low price thanks to some partnerships and advertising, in this case MIUI here and there can show ads, particularly in the post-installation screens of applications. Personally, I couldn’t care less about these ads as the rest of the UI experience was seamless – but potential buyers should be aware of them.

Overall, I think the Xiaomi Mi9 is a fantastic device with the only real and possible deal-breaking compromise being its low-light photography. I hope for the next generation Xiaomi doesn’t make this compromise again, even if the phone costs 10$/€ more.

At 400€ the phone still offers incredible value, and I think any potential buyer will be happy with their purchase.

Camera - Low Light Evaluation
Comments Locked

96 Comments

View All Comments

  • Shlong - Friday, September 13, 2019 - link

    Then disable your adblocker. Hard to pay the writers, server bills, when 70% of your users are ad blocking.
  • PeachNCream - Friday, September 13, 2019 - link

    If a hypothetical 70% of your audience is blocking ads on the site you run, maybe it says more about the advertising than the site's visitors.
  • valinor89 - Friday, September 13, 2019 - link

    I used to periodically disable the adblocker for this site, but each time I had to reenable it because sometimes it has obnoxious ads, autoplay videos, pop ups that hide content and what not.
  • s.yu - Saturday, September 14, 2019 - link

    Does this really work? Are you sure that it's the displays not the clicks that generate revenue? If it's the clicks might as well click all the ads once in a while and block them all when reading.
  • Shlong - Tuesday, September 17, 2019 - link

    So which sites don't have annoying advertising? I use adblock but for sites I frequently visit, I disable, like at Anandtech, Ars-Technica, and others.
  • FunBunny2 - Saturday, September 14, 2019 - link

    "Then disable your adblocker. Hard to pay the writers, server bills, when 70% of your users are ad blocking."

    that's a great gulp of Flavour Aid. think about it, for just a second. will folks who choose to conserve bandwidth (both on the innterTubes and their brains) by ad blocking be likely to ever, ever, ever click on such ads? the answer, of course, is never, never, never. IOW, the ad revenue driven sites are scamming the ad buyers, by 'selling eyes'. which is exactly the same way that print media went. and the innterTubes sites proclaimed that they were oh so new and disruptive. right.

    sites have the tech to sell click-throughs, rather than eyes, but they're scared shitless to do that since the number is minuscule. not to pick on AT specifically, of course. all these sites have the same problem. if they did sell click-throughs then ad blocking is a non-issue, of course.
  • Qasar - Saturday, September 14, 2019 - link

    sadly i use an ad blocker as well, i tried disabling it once, and man.. the ads are EVERYWHERE, makes most of the site practically unreadable. and the auto playing videos, are MOST annoying.
  • Shlong - Tuesday, September 17, 2019 - link

    They are annoying but if people continue to block the ads, Anandtech and similar sites won't be around for that much longer.
  • Korguz - Tuesday, September 17, 2019 - link

    then they should tone some of them down, or like some have asked, switch to a paid version with no ads.
  • FunBunny2 - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    "Anandtech and similar sites won't be around for that much longer."

    once again: sell based on click-throughs and be done with it. selling 'eyes' is a total scam. in fact, selling click-throughs just might, might lead to better ads, not just more obnoxious ones. :)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now