Wireless

For networking, Acer has turned to Killer Networking for both the Gigabit Ethernet, as well as the wireless adapter. The Acer Predator Triton 500 features the Killer Wireless-AC 1550, which is based on Intel’s excellent 9260 Wi-Fi solution, and the Killer E3000 Ethernet adapter. The big change over Intel’s previous 826x wireless is that the 9260 card offers support for 160 Mhz channels, meaning there is a peak theoretical speed of 1.73 Gbps with the 2x2:2 offering, but you’ll need a new access point with wide channel support to get this. In fact, we don’t even have an access point yet with this kind of capability, and even if you did, it runs into issues with what else is connected – most Ethernet is still going to be maxed out at Gigabit.

WiFi Performance - TCP

Performance on the 80 Mhz channels was only average, but if you do need more than the wireless offers, the wired Ethernet is available, or you can combine both with Killer’s DoubleShot Pro software, which can send some traffic over the slower connection to keep your lowest latency network free for gaming. It’s not likely something that is necessary most of the time, but it’s available if needed.

The main advantage of the Killer 1550 though is that being based on Intel’s rock solid wireless networking solution, Killer also gets the benefit of very stable drivers. Over the last couple of years, Intel has walked away with the wireless market, offering the fastest, and most stable networking around. Killer made a wise move partnering with Intel for their latest wireless products.

Audio

Acer offers Waves MaxxAudio for software defined equalization, and it also includes Waves Nx for positional audio, for faux 3-D. The software offers a full graphic EQ as well as some acoustic adjustments to change the bass response, detail, and sound stage width. The speakers actually sound decent considering how thin the laptop is, and there is excellent stereo separation. Bass response is much better than many laptops, and the overall volume level can go up to about 80 dB(A) measured one inch over the trackpad.

For headphones, Acer offers separate 3.5 mm headphone and microphone jacks, and when using headphones the Waves Nx is available for 3D positional audio. The amount of effect can be adjusted in the software, and while it does make 2D audio seem wider than 3D, it can also be disabled if you prefer a more natural sound.

Thermals

The biggest challenge for any gaming laptop is how to deal with the massive amounts of heat generated by modern CPUs and GPUs when gaming, and that is doubly true on thin and light models such as the Acer Predator Triton 500. Acer has approached the problem with some smart engineering and some brute force.

The Triton 500 leverages three fans based on fourth generation AeroBlade 3D Technology, which has a serrated edge to maximize airflow and reduce noise. The three fans tie into five heat pipes, and Acer has crafted large intake and exhaust vents into the rear and sides of the laptop to allow as much air as possible to be moved through the chassis.

The cooling system is also tied to Acer’s PredatorSense software, where you can adjust the fan speeds to suit your tastes, leave them on Auto, or enable CoolBoost which puts all of the fans at 100% speed.

To see how well Acer did, Shadow of the Tomb Raider was run at 1920x1080 with the highest settings.

The fans were left on Auto for the first portion of the test, and you can see that the GPU settles in quickly at about 80°C, running at an average of 1289 MHz. That’s significantly down on the maximum boost levels of a desktop card, which can hit 1710 MHz, or 1800 Mhz if it’s a Founder’s Edition, but the desktop card has a 215-Watt TDP. NVIDIA doesn’t announce the exact TDP of its laptop cards, likely because they are in a range, but the Triton 500 only ships with a 180-Watt AC Adapter, so some simple math removing 45 Watts for the CPU, some for the rest of the system, and a bit of spare, and the Max-Q design is likely under 120 Watts. Near the end of the test, the Turbo feature was enabled which spun the fans up to maximum and overclocked the GPU. You can see the temperatures instantly start to drop, and the GPU is able to ramp up a bit with the extra headroom, hitting an average of 1436 Mhz over this part of the test. Temperatures dropped to 76°C at the same time.

So even though the GPU has a much lower TDP than the desktop card, it’s still able to achieve a lot of its performance, thanks to the exponential nature of transistors. Power goes up at the square of voltage, so the final bit of voltage needed to hit the high frequencies comes at the biggest cost.

The Predator Triton 500 does a good job cooling itself, but it does come at the expense of noise, and this is where the bigger, thicker desktop replacement machines have a big advantage. They can offer this same cooling with larger, thicker fans, allowing them to move more air with less noise. At idle, the fans are running most of the time, and aren’t too intrusive, measuring about 40 dB(A) one inch over the trackpad. On Auto settings during this extended run, the noise was 53.6 dB(A) which is definitely headphone territory. With CoolBoost enabled, the sound level jumped to 59 dB(A), which is quite loud.

Acer offers overclocking on the Predator Triton 500, and if you’re into loud cooling, Acer does make it easy to get a few extra frames per second using their Turbo button.

Software

Acer ships the Predator Triton 500 with Windows 10 Home, and a handful of other software. Some of it is good, and some of it is terrible. On a $500 machine, margins are tight enough where you could maybe justify some of the crapware, even though everyone hates it. But on a $3000 high-end PC there’s no room for this, and Acer should simply cut it out.

Let’s start with the good though. The Acer PredatorSense software is well layed out, looks great, and offers a lot of functionality. You can not only adjust the lighting and cooling, but also do overclocking here, and get some excellent system level monitoring for temperatures and usage. Acer also offers GameSync so you can tie specific settings to games, so when you launch a game the system automatically changes the settings. I really like the layout and design here, and it looks quite modern.

Acer also offers the standard Acer Care Center application which lets you quickly access support, and update drivers and firmware directly from the company. It’s the same software found on most, if not all, of their current lineup, and is well thought out and easy to use.

The bad though is really bad. Acer ships the laptop with Norton Antivirus, which of course comes with a trial period and then wants you to pay for a full-term subscription. We’re all pretty used to this, and you can uninstall it easily enough. But Acer also includes software called Acer Jumpstart which throws targeted spam into your notification center. While testing this laptop I got a popup warning recommending McAfee which was downright deceptive. The irony is of course Acer shipped the laptop with Norton already. Perhaps they shouldn’t be recommending even more antivirus. There’s also the “Acer Collection” which is a list of apps is a list of software from the store that they think you might want to buy. There is zero need for this.

Even Microsoft has gotten into the crapware game, so it’s hard to really fault Acer for doing this on some products, but if they want to keep their premium devices feeling premium, they don’t need to riddle them with junk software. Install the utilities that are specific and useful, and leave the rest off.

Battery Life Final Words
Comments Locked

46 Comments

View All Comments

  • Spunjji - Friday, April 26, 2019 - link

    You're looking at something similar to me; only I'm not interested in the 2080 specifically as it's comically overpriced. I'd prefer a 2060 and enough thermal headroom to get it running at something close to actual desktop 2060 performance.

    nVidia really dropped a bollock this generation. After having rough performance parity between desktop and notebook with Pascal (Max-Q snake oil excluded) they quietly dropped it for Turing but kept the same naming convention. The performance disparity is egregious now, while prices have been out of control since Maxwell.
  • vicbee - Thursday, April 25, 2019 - link

    Guess there are enough 16 to 25 year olds with $3k+ to spend on gaming laptops who love the bling. Beyond my understanding.
  • Junz - Thursday, April 25, 2019 - link

    I have the triton 500 and it doesn't have Optimus but there is and option to turn on Mshybrid in the BIOS and in the predator sense software settings gear wheel there is an option for dgpu only which if turned off I believe does the same thing.

    Also would never have bought the laptop at full price but managed to get the $2500 model for $2100 tax free from Best Buy.
  • Brett Howse - Thursday, April 25, 2019 - link

    Hi Junz. Thanks for the tip. I see there is an option for Optimus so I've enabled it (disabling G-SYNC) and updated the article text. Re-running the battery life tests as well.
  • Junz - Friday, April 26, 2019 - link

    No problem. I feel like I get around 6-7 hours from a full charge while running something like dev-c++ and music/YouTube playing in the background. I can't wait to see your results though.
  • PeachNCream - Friday, April 26, 2019 - link

    Wish Acer would just use Intel branded network adapters in these systems. It feels like a frisking rather than a premium experience to buy at the highest end, but get saddled with Killer NICs.
  • Brett Howse - Friday, April 26, 2019 - link

    Killer uses Intel as their base adapter now and this laptop uses the 1550 Killer which is based on the 9260 Intel
  • PeachNCream - Friday, April 26, 2019 - link

    Yes, I'd heard that was the case. The trouble is that as with any rebranding effort, a company that purchases and resells has to perform some sort of markup in order to turn over a profit. That's where Rivet Networks (RN) sits, as a middleman business between Intel and the OEMs. Normally these in-between companies offer the prospect of added value, but RN's offerings of additional software don't generally improve on vanilla Intel adapters by offering useful features. A lot of us with networking backgrounds and people that have picked up the basics of how packets find their way to the end destination and back remain unconvinced that software prioritization at the NIC makes a measurable difference and there is a dearth of supporting numbers to prove otherwise. Meanwhile features like ethernet adapter teaming (market speak - DoubleShot) are not new features and have little reason to be implemented at an endpoint node that mainly performs consumer computing. Rivet has worked at stabilizing their software so at least that problem is not as pronounced as it was in the past and the switch to buying Intel was probably a good move from a driver standpoint, yet Killer NICs selling points appear to prey on a lack of knowledge and have that snake oil flavor. I'd hope Rivet finds a different, more meaningful way to add value so they can earn the premium level the company is hoping to achieve. Before that can happen, something fundamental needs to change about what they're offering and how they're offering it....or someone needs to post some numbers that put the proof in the pudding about the claims they're making.
  • Hrel - Saturday, April 27, 2019 - link

    Acer has known reliability issues, what I'd really like to see is stress testing, since you are apparently gonna keep advertising their products. I've never had an Acer anything last more than 2 years. With that said it has been a while exactly for that reason. So, I say, abuse the keykoard, open the screen 1000 times, slide the thing off couches onto tile and carpet. Throw it in a backpack and act like you're a train commuter, pick it up, shuffle it around, toss it back down 1000 times.

    Until this kind of testing is done on Acer I'll never give them another cent. I just don't trust anything they make. Regardless of the components inside, assembly and quality build matter.
  • Junz - Saturday, April 27, 2019 - link

    I've had mine for 2 weeks and what your describing is pretty much how mine is treated and so far it seems pretty sturdy. Even dropped my back pack on the floor once and freaked out when I heard the loud metallic thunk but it held up pretty well. I don't know how it'll be in 2 years but I haven't had a laptop last me 2 years yet(I'm pretty rough with my electronics), only time will tell how this one holds up.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now