CPU Performance, Short Form

For our motherboard reviews, we use our short form testing method. These tests usually focus on if a motherboard is using MultiCore Turbo (the feature used to have maximum turbo on at all times, giving a frequency advantage), or if there are slight gains to be had from tweaking the firmware. We put the memory settings at the CPU manufacturers suggested frequency, making it very easy to see which motherboards have MCT enabled by default.

For Z390 we are running an updated version of our test suite, including OS and CPU cooler. This has some effect on our results.

Rendering - Blender 2.78: link

For a render that has been around for what seems like ages, Blender is still a highly popular tool. We managed to wrap up a standard workload into the February 5 nightly build of Blender and measure the time it takes to render the first frame of the scene. Being one of the bigger open source tools out there, it means both AMD and Intel work actively to help improve the codebase, for better or for worse on their own/each other's microarchitecture.

Rendering: Blender 2.78

Streaming and Archival Video Transcoding - Handbrake 1.1.0

A popular open source tool, Handbrake is the anything-to-anything video conversion software that a number of people use as a reference point. The danger is always on version numbers and optimization, for example the latest versions of the software can take advantage of AVX-512 and OpenCL to accelerate certain types of transcoding and algorithms. The version we use here is a pure CPU play, with common transcoding variations.

We have split Handbrake up into several tests, using a Logitech C920 1080p60 native webcam recording (essentially a streamer recording), and convert them into two types of streaming formats and one for archival. The output settings used are:

  • 720p60 at 6000 kbps constant bit rate, fast setting, high profile
  • 1080p60 at 3500 kbps constant bit rate, faster setting, main profile
  • 1080p60 HEVC at 3500 kbps variable bit rate, fast setting, main profile

Handbrake 1.1.0 - 720p60 x264 6000 kbps FastHandbrake 1.1.0 - 1080p60 x264 3500 kbps FasterHandbrake 1.1.0 - 1080p60 HEVC 3500 kbps Fast

Rendering – POV-Ray 3.7: link

The Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer, or POV-Ray, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 1-2 minutes on high-end platforms.

Rendering: POV-Ray 3.7

Compression – WinRAR 5.4: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30-second 720p videos.

Encoding: WinRAR 5.40

Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link

As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.

Encoding: 7-Zip

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz, and IPC win in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.

System: 3D Particle Movement v2.1

Neuron Simulation - DigiCortex v1.20: link

The newest benchmark in our suite is DigiCortex, a simulation of biologically plausible neural network circuits, and simulates activity of neurons and synapses. DigiCortex relies heavily on a mix of DRAM speed and computational throughput, indicating that systems which apply memory profiles properly should benefit and those that play fast and loose with overclocking settings might get some extra speed up. Results are taken during the steady-state period in a 32k neuron simulation and represented as a function of the ability to simulate in real time (1.000x equals real-time).

System: DigiCortex 1.20 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)

System Performance Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

33 Comments

View All Comments

  • Alistair - Friday, April 12, 2019 - link

    The problem I've had with several Z390 boards is their inability to handle the 9900k at full load above 4.5ghz. Prime95 will reduce the clock speed to about 4.5ghz despite settings. It's not just a VRM temp issue causing the downclock. You're better off with an 8700k than a 9900k imo with this board. I wish the 9900k OC was tested with prime95 in the review :)
  • dotes12 - Friday, April 12, 2019 - link

    Any version of Prime95 after 26.6 use AVX instead of SSE instructions. Most people overclock their CPU to be stable at the workloads they typically perform, and 100% AVX is not a typical workload for most people. To help people overclock, the Z390 chipset allows the detection of AVX workloads and allow an overclock deduction (AVX Offset) to continue to be stable and not create so much heat. I tried disabling my AVX offset and it would always crash my 9900K running at 5.0 GHz within a couple seconds of starting the Prime95 AVX test.
  • Surfacround - Friday, April 12, 2019 - link

    interesting, asus my z390i-gaming and i9-9900k (with evga 750p2 psu and nzxt h41 AIO cooler) can pull 250w running prime95 or y-cruncher...(hwinfo watt readout) (serious heat... 95-100c) but it does not crash...
  • weevilone - Monday, April 15, 2019 - link

    So the solution to rigorous AVX workloads on the 9900K is to go with a CPU that uses fewer cores to make your overclock look better? Ok..
  • LoneWolf15 - Sunday, June 2, 2019 - link

    Did you turn off AVX tests to run Prime95? AVX testing was added in recent versions, and really raises the temps. Testing for stability, most recommend turning AVX off.
    I haven't done Prime95, but I'm rock-stable 24/7 for days/weeks of Folding@home running all eight CPU cores of my 9900K to 100% at 4.8GHz using this board.
  • drexnx - Friday, April 12, 2019 - link

    I can never tell if the lower part of the aorus logo is the lower jaw of the bird, or if it's a bird-man hybrid and it's doing a bicep curl.
  • Cellar Door - Friday, April 12, 2019 - link

    Neither - its the talon(claw). Just imagine an eagle/falcon swooping down to attack its prey.

    On a side note - Gigabyte doesn't cheap out on features (wifi, 1220 audio and solid vrm) but I do agree a wonky bios can ruin a positive user experience.

    After reading about poor OC bios section - on their b450 and x470 Ryzen boards, in the end I went with Asus, even though I had to pay after %15.
  • Death666Angel - Friday, April 12, 2019 - link

    Seems weird that the talon is pointed the wrong way up? :)

    I've had pleasureable experiences with Gigabyte during the P55 era and have a nice little parallel port Atom ITX board. I'm currently running an MSI mainboard and have had great AsRock ones.
  • MDD1963 - Saturday, April 13, 2019 - link

    So the talon hand is doing a biceps curl/posing routine? :)
  • 29a - Friday, April 12, 2019 - link

    birdman for sure

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now