System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however, this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, but also the ability for the manufacturer to optimize USB speed, audio quality (based on audio codec), POST time and latency. This can come down to manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

For Z390 we are running an updated version of our test suite, including OS and CPU cooler. This has some effect on our results.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single ASUS GTX 980 GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the Thermaltake 1200W power supply. This power supply has ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our test bed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power: Long Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: OS Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: Prime95 Blend (w/ GTX 980)

Looking at the power charts above, the GIGABYTE Z390 Aorus Master performs superbly in comparison to other boards in the same price bracket such as the MSI MEG Z390 ACE. The power consumption performance in both long idle and idle states are middle of the road, but at full load is where the Z390 Aorus Master really shows us its efficiency in our testing.

Non-UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.)

Non UEFI POST Time

In our non-UEFI POST time test, the Z390 Aorus Master actually performs a little better than the above graph shows. In our testing, we usually discount the Windows loading time during POST. The Z390 Aorus Master completely bypassed this procedure and went straight from POST into Windows. For fair testing, the result as normal was taken, but in reality, it's a little quicker than the graph suggests which would shoot it further up the table. The crux is, the Z390 Aorus Master has a fast POST.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

None of the boards tested so far has had optimizations for DPC latency out of the box and while some boards do appear to perform better than others at default, the Z390 Aorus Master misses the mark from a lot of other models on test.

Board Features, Test Bed and Setup CPU Performance, Short Form
Comments Locked

36 Comments

View All Comments

  • spaceweasel - Monday, May 27, 2019 - link

    Solid 5.0Ghz at 38C, at idle, on my Aorus Master, with F8 BIOS. One of the best motherboards I have ever used.
  • 3dfx_Rampage - Friday, March 22, 2019 - link

    And yet a bottom of the barrel Asus board performed better. More phases does not automatically make a VRM better.
  • shaolin95 - Thursday, April 4, 2019 - link

    hahahahaha BS...Asus you can cook on it but that is how butthurt Asus fanboys are. CAnt accept that on z390, Asus dropped the ball big time
  • Opencg - Wednesday, March 27, 2019 - link

    for all those phases it sure comes out alot slower than the asus boards
  • Cyruskain - Thursday, March 21, 2019 - link

    "During the overclock testing on the Z390 Aorus Master, we had to take a slightly different approach due to some instability as we went through the multipliers with default power settings."

    Yes, yes, and yes. I bought this board back in November on Black Friday due to a great sale New Egg had on it (which surprises me that this review is as late as it is. This board is about 5 months old now). But I simply couldn't figure out how to overclock the CPU manually via BIOS on this board due to crashing loops. I ultimately settled on using the Appcenter EZTune software which placed my 9700k @ 5.1 and ~1.3v, although it fluctuates depending on load (of course). I'm happy enough with a software generated 5.1. But OCing this board shouldn't have been as annoying as it was.

    I'm actually surprised it was near bottom of the barrel for gaming fps though. Bummer. But I like the Mobo all things considered, especially the amount of USB ports it has.

    Oh, and it does have a solid VRM as El Sama stated.
  • gavbon - Thursday, March 21, 2019 - link

    I'm currently testing the GIGABYTE Z390 Aorus Pro WIFI (on the test bench) and the overclocking is pretty similar in experience. As I highlighted in the review, this board (and the Pro WIFI) are the only boards where I've had to adjust LLC and power settings to achieve 5-5.1 GHz.
  • Cyruskain - Thursday, March 21, 2019 - link

    @gavbon I'm going to attempt to mirror the BIOS changes you did and see where that nets me. I also attempted to adjust the LLC alongside the freq. multiplier, but I continued to get crashing loops. However, there were things from the article you did that I didn't, so I'm curious to try it out. But, at the end of the day, the software netting me 5.1 isn't anything to scoff at. It's pretty impressive for software.
  • gavbon - Thursday, March 21, 2019 - link

    At least the software gave you a stable overclock, to begin with! 5.1 GHz is certainly good, pretty awesome if you ask me!
  • sonny73n - Friday, March 22, 2019 - link

    You can OC GPU with software but I would recommend against OCing CPU with software, especially Gigabyte software. Google it!
  • ZedVile - Thursday, March 21, 2019 - link

    I have done a bit of testing on this Motherboard both on the test bench and fully integrated into a build. Ring ratio seems to play a role with performance and defaults have changed through-out the bios revisions. Huge variations in performance, CPU voltage requirements and ring ratio defaults.

    Bios F6 defaulted the Ring ratio to 4.8 while later revisions have lowered the ratio to 4.7 and 4.6.

    I have experienced the best bench performance with the 9900k on F6 BIOS ring ratio 4.8 and at 5.0GHZ all core at 1.285 Volts. B-die at 4266 1.5v

    Passes Intel Burn Test very high and maximum. 5.2GHZ @ 1.375 also passes IBT very high on F6 bios.

    On the contrary bios F8e requires 1.325v @5.0GHZ and does not pass IBT @ maximum. Performance is also down if the ring ratio is not manually adjusted back up to 48.

    Buildzoid has a great vid on samsung B-die overclocking on the Z390 Master

    Over on the Gigabyte forum users have complained about XMP profiles and RAM compatibility throughout the bios revisions...

    @Gavin Which bios revision were you using, and did you test DPC latency & gaming perf with different bios revisions?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now