The Test

Without any Founders Edition, NVIDIA is pushing out the GTX 1660 Ti as a fully custom launch, and while the EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC Black has reference clocks, the TDP is set at 130W rather than the reference 120W. To keep testing and analysis as apples-to-apples as possible, as usual we've emulated reference GTX 1660 Ti specifications. While not perfect, this should be reasonably accurate for a virtual reference card as we look at reference-to-reference comparisons.

Test Setup
CPU Intel Core i7-7820X @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 7 (F9g)
PSU Corsair AX860i
Storage OCZ Toshiba RD400 (1TB)
Memory G.Skill TridentZ
DDR4-3200 4 x 8GB (16-18-18-38)
Case NZXT Phantom 630 Windowed Edition
Monitor LG 27UD68P-B
Video Cards EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC Black
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (Air)
AMD Radeon RX 590
AMD Radeon RX 580
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Founders Edtion
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (2GB)
Video Drivers NVIDIA Release 418.91
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 2019 Edition 19.2.2
OS Windows 10 x64 Pro (1803)
Spectre and Meltdown Patched

Thanks to Corsair, we were able to get a replacement for our AX860i, and so power consumption figures will differ for earlier GPU 2018 Bench data.

In the same vein, for Ashes, GTA V, F1 2018, and Shadow of War, we've updated some of the benchmark automation and data processing steps, so results may vary at the 1080p mark compared to previous GPU 2018 data.

Meet the EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC Black Battlefield 1
Comments Locked

157 Comments

View All Comments

  • PeachNCream - Friday, February 22, 2019 - link

    This article reads a little like that infamous Steve Ballmer developers thing except it's not "developers, developers, developers, etc" but "traditional, traditional, traditionally, etc." instead. Please explore alternate expressions. The word in question implies long history which is something the computing industry lacks and the even shorter time periods referenced (a GPU generation or two) most certainly lack so the overuse stands out like a sore thumb in many of Anandtech's publications.
  • Oxford Guy - Saturday, February 23, 2019 - link

    How about the utterly asinine use of the word "kit" to describe a set of RAM sticks that simply snap into a motherboard?

    The Altair 8800 was a kit. The Heathkit H8 was a kit. Two sticks of RAM that snap into a board doth not a kit maketh.
  • futurepastnow - Friday, February 22, 2019 - link

    A triple-slot card? Really, EVGA?
  • PeachNCream - Friday, February 22, 2019 - link

    Yup, for 120W TDP of all things. But it's in the charts as a 2.75 slot width card so EVGA is probably hoping that no one understands how expansion slots actually would not permit the remaining .25 slot width to support anything.
  • darckhart - Friday, February 22, 2019 - link

    lol this was my first thought upon seeing the photo as well.
  • GreenReaper - Saturday, February 23, 2019 - link

    I suspect it was the cheapest way to get that level of cooling. A more compact heatsink-fan combo could have cost more.

    130W (which is the TDP here) is not a *trivial* amount to dissipate, and it's quite tightly packed.
  • Oxford Guy - Saturday, February 23, 2019 - link

    I think all performance GPUs should be triple slot. In fact, I think the GPU form factor is ridiculously obsolete.
  • Oxford Guy - Monday, February 25, 2019 - link

    Judging by techpowerup's reviews, though, the EVGA card's cooling is inefficient.
  • eastcoast_pete - Friday, February 22, 2019 - link

    @Ryan and Nate: What generation of HDMI and DP does the EVGA card have/support? Apologize if you had it listed and I missed it.
  • Ryan Smith - Friday, February 22, 2019 - link

    HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now