Final Thoughts

2018 has been a very successful year for Qualcomm and the Snapdragon 845. The company had provided an extremely solid and well-rounded SoC for device vendors to build their flagship devices on- and by the looks of it the Snapdragon 855 continues this trend.

I’ve been a bit sceptical about the merits of Qualcomm’s 1+3 CPU configuration, however after seeing the preliminary performance and power efficiency figures of the new prime core on the new chipset, I’m not nearly as concerned. We reserve any final verdict for when we will have tested final commercial devices, as that’s where in the end we’ll also see the efficiency effect of the non-prime cores, and how they’ll position themselves against the competition.

Performance wise, the Snapdragon 855 is a bit odd. In steady-state workloads like SPEC the chipset is seemingly performing very well and matches or exceeds the new Kirin 980. Here Qualcomm’s changes to the CPU microarchitecture might even actually be visible in the test results, which is a nice feat. Unfortunately the memory subsystem still seems to include some of DRAM latency regressions that we also saw in the Snapdragon 845, both which are due to Qualcomm’s system level cache.

Real-world performance, while still excellent, doesn’t quite manage to reach my expectations I had for the chipset. Here for whatever reason, the chip’s improvements are not nearly as pronounced as in the more synthetic tests. Again the odd thing is that the Kirin 980 still manages to beat the Snapdragon 855 in near most of these workloads. Qualcomm had reasoned that the microarchitectural changes to the CPU were meant to help web browser performance, yet it’s here where the chip slightly lags behind the competition – I do wonder if this is a case of the CPU again being limited by either Qualcomm’s choice of more conservative caches or due to the latency penalty of the system cache.

Although the performance shown today is exemplary, it still does look maybe a little rough around the edges in some of our system performance tests – here maybe Qualcomm will be able to investigate and further improve things until we actually see commercial devices.

Whether the system performance will be improved in final devices or not, what is clear though is that power efficiency looks outstanding. Qualcomm had me worried as the PR teams had avoided talking about efficiency during the chipset’s launch, but the results today (even if they’ll need to be verified), look very promising and should result in notable battery life improvements in 2019’s devices.

On the GPU side of things, Qualcomm’s more muted performance projections of 20% were because the company has again focused a good part of the process improvements into bringing the overall power back down from the usually higher levels that we saw on the Snapdragon 845.

Overall – the Snapdragon 855 looks to be another extremely well executed SoC from Qualcomm, and I’m looking forward to validating the results and testing out the first commercial devices once they become available.

GPU Performance - Returning To Lower Power
Comments Locked

132 Comments

View All Comments

  • Wilco1 - Wednesday, January 16, 2019 - link

    That's rubbish. Both Geekbench and SPEC are good cross-platform benchmarks as long as you use the same compiler and options.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Tuesday, January 22, 2019 - link

    Which you, inevitably, do NOT do when com[paring an ARM and X86 platform.
  • SquarePeg - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

    Geekbench is rubbish. There's a reason why Apple blocks benchmarking apps with only a very few exceptions that show them in the best light. They go so far as to even block games that have benchmarking utilities built into them. Apple flat out goes out of it's way to obscure the real world performance of it's chips. Until Apple stops acting borderline fraudulent about performance numbers I am calling BS.
  • goatfajitas - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

    "Geekbench is rubbish. There's a reason why Apple blocks benchmarking apps with only a very few exceptions that show them in the best light."

    Exactly.
  • Wilco1 - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

    Name a better CPU benchmark then. Just one.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Tuesday, January 22, 2019 - link

    If ARM is so amazingly efficient, why is there not a push to use it in laptops and desktops?

    Could it be because, outside of specifically recompiled apps, ARM is still nowhere close to x86 in real world performance? Perhaps once apple finally makes an ARM MAC we can find out, but until then the capability of ARM devices to excel at geekbench is worthless, as they are tied to devices with incapable OSes and cannot run production software.
  • darkich - Thursday, January 24, 2019 - link

    You lack perception.
    ARM is a small design firm that sells SoC designs, and gets its revenue from the licensing fees of over 1 billion smartphones sold every year.
    The amount of revenues they would get from laptops this way is simply not worth the extra investment.
    ARM naturally choses to focus all their resources on where the money and competition really is.

    As for the custom SoC vendors such as Samsung and Huawei, the story is similar.
    Staying at the top of the smartphone game is an absolute priority for them.
    The margins and stakes are far bigger than what they can hope to get from laptops.
    Also, all the most advanced semiconductor lines are initially reserved for smartphone chips, with desktop and laptop businesses standing in the waiting line.
  • techconc - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

    Actual benchmarks, including larger ones like SPEC clearly demonstrate that you are wrong. Marketing has nothing to do with such results.
  • End-User - Wednesday, January 16, 2019 - link

    Not even the 9900K has AVX-512.
  • darkich - Wednesday, January 16, 2019 - link

    Man you are CLUELESS.

    In 4K rendering, iPad pro DESTROYS a core i7 laptop!!

    https://www.laptopmag.com/reviews/laptops/new-ipad...

    It really is a high time you desktop backward looking ignorants wake up

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now