The Design



Canon EOS 300D (Rebel)
142 x 99 x 72.9 mm


Canon EOS 10D
149.7 x 107.5 x 75.0 mm


The first considerable difference that we noticed between these two cameras is the way they felt in our hands. The Rebel casing is made of a slick, silver plastic, while the 10D casing is constructed with magnesium alloy. Because of the metal construction of the 10D, it does weigh a little more (30.5 oz with battery) than the Rebel (23 oz with battery). The 10D is bulkier in general, as you can see by its dimensions, but it feels well balanced in our hands and even has a molded, rubberized grip for the trigger hand. The extra room in its height allows for the camera's main power switch to be located on the back of the camera instead of the top. Another interesting difference was Canon's decision to put the LCD panel on the back of the Rebel, situated right above the LCD monitor. The 10D's LCD panel is on the top right, following a far more traditional Canon SLR style. The navigation system utilized by the two cameras appears to be similar except for one change - the Rebel has four arrow buttons (cross keys) and a set button in the middle, where the 10D has a wheel (Quick Control Dial) with a set button in the middle. The Main Dial, situated just behind the shutter button also serves as a means to navigate the menus.


Rebel back


10D back



Rebel cross keys


10D Quick Control Dial


These two cameras have virtually the same CMOS sensor, sizing in at 22.7 mm x 15.1 mm. It is important to keep in mind that the Rebel and the 10D do not have full-size sensors like the Canon 1Ds (35.8 x 23.8 mm), for example. This means a magnification factor of 1.6x. In other words, using the same lens from your 35mm film Canon EOS 300 will give you a cropped version of the same picture with the 10D and the Rebel. This can be seen as a good and bad thing. It means that to get the results you would normally get from a regular wide angle lens, you would have to buy a very expensive, super wide angle lens. However, at the same time, it means that your old 300mm telephoto lens has just earned an extra 180mm coverage, giving you a whopping 480mm effective shooting ability. Again, it all depends on how you look at the situation.

Both the 10D and the Rebel use Compact Flash (Type I or II). Also, because they have a FAT32 file system, they are able to support larger-capacity cards such as the Lexar 4GB and the Hitachi Microdrive 4GB. This is a great advantage over other types of removable media-based cameras.


Rebel


10D


Both cameras have a pop-up flash with a release button on the front side, opposite the shutter button. The 10D has a motorized mechanism that releases the flash, while the Rebel relies on non-motorized spring action release. We measured the Rebel's flash at 2.25 cm higher than the 10D's. This difference gives the Rebel's flash an advantage when shooting with longer lenses. Because it is higher, it has more room to shoot over the lens instead of through it (which would create shadows on the subject).

One major addition to the Rebel was the compatibility of a new type of lens, called EF-S (Electrofocus Short Back Focus). Canon introduced this lens as an 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 to be packaged with the Digital Rebel. It should be noted that EF-S lenses are not compatible with other EF mount cameras such as the 10D. The EF-S mount is marked by a white dot on the front of the camera body indicating where to align the lens when attaching it. The 18-55mm lens boasts a perfected lens coating that is supposed to minimize reflections, which would guard against flaring and ghosting. The lens is also capable of focusing at distances as close as 0.28m. Basically, Canon is trying to compensate for the 1.6x magnification factor by distributing a wide angle zoom lens with the Rebel. For the purpose of this review, I will be using a 50mm f2.5 macro lens that uses an EF mount simply because it will fit on both cameras.

The controls for adjusting picture settings are a little different for each camera (mostly because of the subtraction of the wheel on the Rebel). The Main Dial is responsible on both cameras for adjusting the:
  • Aperture in Av (Aperture Priority) mode
  • Shutter speed in (Shutter Priority)Tv mode
  • Shutter speed and aperture combination in P (Program AE) mode
  • Shutter speed in Manual mode


On the 10D, adjusting the aperture in Manual mode is just a simple turn of the Quick Control Dial. On the Rebel, you have to hold down the Av/Ec (Aperture value/Exposure compensation) button while you turn the Main Dial in order to adjust the aperture. While the button is within reach of my thumb, it is certainly more convenient on the 10D to spin the wheel.



One huge advantage that the 10D has over the Rebel is the option to adjust Custom Functions under the main menu. One such option is to enable mirror lockup. Mirror lockup is when the mirror flips up prior to exposure in order to help prevent vibrations normally caused by the mirror movement. Any wildlife photographer would need to utilize this feature to keep their images sharp while shooting with telephoto lenses. The same applies to macro photographers. Mirror lockup ability is not a feature of the Rebel. In addition to mirror lockup, you are given the option to separate AF (Auto Focus) from AE (Auto Exposure) lock (normally, they coincide), which is very helpful in circumstances where you want to have total control over the exposure lock (function 4). Another option allows you to control the activity of the AF-assist beam. In automatic modes, if the ambient light is too low, the flash will emit short preliminary flashes in order to attain focus. Sometimes, this can be frustrating if you are in situations where the extra flashing could impose on your subject. Luckily, custom function 5 gives you control of the nature of the assist beam. Another really cool feature is the option to enable auto reduction of the fill flash. Basically, this option is for situations when you are shooting outdoors with ambient light and you want to use the flash as a fill light to cancel out unneeded shadows. Enabling this option (function 14) will automatically weaken the flash if the ambient light levels are bright enough. This is to ensure a well exposed background while preventing the flash from washing out your subject. These are just a few of the 17 custom functions on the 10D.

Two more features that the 10D offers are the ability to select what type of metering and auto focus that you would like. For metering, you can choose between evaluative 35-area, partial (9% of viewfinder), and center-weighted average. The Rebel has the ability to do these metering modes too, but it automatically decides what is best and offers no input from the user. On the 10D, the user can choose between One Shot AF (for still subjects), AI Servo AF (to track moving subjects), or AI Focus AF (to let the camera switch from One Shot to Servo if it detects movement). Again, the Rebel has these features, but gives the user no control over them.

The 10D is capable of taking 9 consecutive frames at 3 fps, while the Rebel can take 4 consecutive frames at 2.5 fps. This advantage of the 10D may be more important to some photographers if they are likely to be shooting sports events or other fast-paced subjects.

The Specifications The Battery
Comments Locked

19 Comments

View All Comments

  • Mday - Wednesday, July 7, 2004 - link

    how the hell are you going to compare these two cameras?

    This does not compare to what dpreview can offer.
  • GOSHARKS - Tuesday, July 6, 2004 - link

    i agree with shuttleboi, there are many sites out there that already provide excellent reviews from varying viewpoints (dpreview, imaging resource, megapixel.net, steves digicams, dcresource, etc). anandtech should focus on the things that the other large sites dont cover, what shuttleboi listed is a good start.
  • shuttleboi - Tuesday, July 6, 2004 - link

    Although your review is nice, I recommend you focus your attention more towards computer issues related to digicams rather than the cameras themselves (which other professional websites already do extremely well). Some other issues might be: (1) There is a 3rd party hack to the 300D firmware that reveals features found in the more expensive 10D. Is this safe? Does it really work? (2) How well do portable storage devices work (that let you dump a memory card to disk)? Relibability? Performance? There is absolutely nothing on the web right now that fully evaluates the products on the market. Here is an expansive list: http://fhoude34.free.fr/PortableHD.htm . (I'm waiting for the Nikon Coolwalker, but only because I don't trust companies whom I've never heard of.) (3) Software that manages/downloads photos. Photoshop Album? Breezebrowser? WTF?
  • opaper - Tuesday, July 6, 2004 - link

    And if you go to this digital camera review site you see that they found no diffrence in the resolution tests. I'm not saying that thier test is more valid than yours it's just a second opinion.

    http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos300d/page2...
  • jliechty - Monday, July 5, 2004 - link

    For covering the basic differences between the two cameras, this was a good review. However, to me this was pretty old news, since this particular topic has been covered a gazillion places already in a gazillion different ways.
    And of course, any camera can be a "professional" camera if you use it to make money, but in the traditional definiton, the 10D comes close to being a pro camera. The Rebel is not. If you want to see some real pro stuff, google the 1Ds. Or if you'd like some real sticker shock, check the price of the Phase One P25 (then add $8K USD more for the medium format autofocus camera system to go with it). ;-)
  • stephencaston - Monday, July 5, 2004 - link

    #2, sorry if I didn't make it clear in the article, but on page 3 I did mention that I was using a Canon 50mm Macro lens for all tests. I will add another reference to the lens at the beginning of the image quality tests too.

    You make a good point though. The quality of the final picture lies in the quality of the lens used. Thats why I decided to use the same 50mm lens for all the tests on both cameras.
  • DerekWilson - Monday, July 5, 2004 - link

    I'm not the resident camera expert (hi Stephen), but these cameras are "prosumer" and not professional ... kinda scary isn't it :-)

    I liked the article too. Maybe I'm a little biased, but I thought it was both very thurough as well as easy to follow (especially not being a camera guy myself).
  • shuttleboi - Monday, July 5, 2004 - link

    How can you possibly have tests trying to show detail and colour and not even mention the lenses you use?? As any good photographer knows, the lens is far more important than the camera body, even for digital. Did you use the kit 18-55 EF-S for the 300D? That's a horrible lens. Unless you used the same lens for both cameras, your tests are meaningless.
  • Araemo - Monday, July 5, 2004 - link

    Great Article, I was very pleased to see you guys are going to do digital camera reviews, since I'm going to be in the market for a camera soon. I hope to see reviews of more 'prosumer' or 'consumer' level cameras, rather than these $1000 cameras.. though I understand you probably get pretty much what you pay for.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now