Battery Life

Apple is generally quite conservative when quoting battery life, and the iPad Pro 11 and 12.9 both are rated at up to 10 hours of web usage. The smaller model offers a 29.37 Wh battery, and the larger model offers 36.71 Wh of capacity. Both of these capacities are much lower than a Surface Pro 6, which has 45 Wh, or a typical Ultrabook, which would be well over 50 Wh.

Our battery tests are performed at 200 nits of brightness.

Web Browsing Battery Life

Battery Life 2016 - Web

Web Browsing Battery Life 2016 (WiFi)

Our iPad achieved well over the rated ten hours, coming in at 12:13 on our web rundown test. This is a couple of hours longer than you’d get on an iPhone XS Max, and well ahead of the battery life on a Surface Pro 6 on this same test. This is one area where the efficiencies of the SoC, coupled with the operating system, pay big dividends compared to the PC space.

Battery Life Movie Playback

Battery Life Movie Playback

Movie playback is a unique situation where the workload can be offloaded to fixed function hardware in the media block, which is much more efficient than doing the work on the CPU. The iPad Pro achieved just over 15.5 hours of movie playback of a locally stored video. This is a couple of hours longer than you’d get on a Surface Pro with the same workload, despite the much smaller battery capacity.

Normalized Results

Battery Life 2016 - Web - Normalized

One thing we do on our PC reviews is to look at the efficiency of the device by removing the battery capacity from the equation. This shows the current gap between tablets and PCs. The Surface Pro 6 is one of our most efficient devices around, offering over 12 minutes per Wh of battery capacity, and the iPad over doubles that efficiency at almost 25 minutes per Wh. Or put in other terms, the iPad, on average, was drawing 2.4 Watts of power during the web test, and the Surface Pro 6 was drawing about 5 Watts. Considering much of the Surface Pro draw is the display, it shows you how effective Apple has been in driving down all of the power drain.

Charge Time

The other end of the spectrum is the charge time. Apple ships the iPad Pro with a USB-C power adapter with 18 Watts of output. That is quite a bit lower than you’d see on a laptop, and for example the MacBook ships with a 30 Watt AC Adapter. That means that the iPad charge time is quite long, despite the small battery capacity.

Battery Charge Time

In addition, Apple ships an almost comically short USB-C cable with the iPad Pro. At three feet long, it will almost certainly be impossible to charge and use the iPad unless you happen to have an outlet right on your desk. At least with the move to USB-C getting a longer cable is not an issue, but for such an expensive device, this is a bit silly.

The Liquid Retina Display Wireless, Audio, Cameras, and Software
Comments Locked

145 Comments

View All Comments

  • blackcrayon - Wednesday, December 5, 2018 - link

    That's where the app store comes in - it would make sense to ban any apps that didn't work with just the touchscreen. That would make a lot more sense than what they originally did with the Apple TV and gaming controllers...
  • blackcrayon - Wednesday, December 5, 2018 - link

    It absolutely is a "toggle" - at least for basic functionality - the iOS Simulator has been around for a decade and is a "mouse driven iOS" after all...
  • nico_mach - Tuesday, December 4, 2018 - link

    For $800, they should move as fast as an A12x. It should be multi-user and have basic file management features, even if only for external storage.
  • ex2bot - Tuesday, December 4, 2018 - link

    Not that this really affects the good points you make, but GoodReader does a very nice job accessing SMB and other shares.
  • markiz - Wednesday, December 5, 2018 - link

    100+
  • Lezmaka - Tuesday, December 4, 2018 - link

    How much storage does the iPad you tested have? Was it 1TB meaning 2GB extra RAM? If so, since most people won't be getting that version, how does that affect performance or battery life (if at all)
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, December 4, 2018 - link

    It's the 1TB model. So yes, it has an extra 2GB of RAM. Not that it would make a difference in a device this large. The screen is the single biggest power consumer by a large margin, followed by the SoC.

    As for performance, it's more difficult to say since we don't have a 4GB model. It shouldn't be impacted much, but throw enough large applications at it and you might trigger something.
  • melgross - Tuesday, December 4, 2018 - link

    Adobe demo’d photoshop on the 1TB 12.0’ model using a 3GB file with hundreds of live layers, and the speed popped. The amount of RAM doesn’t seem to be an issue here. I would have liked to see tests of the storage subsystem to see the speeds there.
  • vFunct - Tuesday, December 4, 2018 - link

    Isn't the extra RAM on the 1TB model used purely for disk caching?
  • tipoo - Tuesday, December 4, 2018 - link

    Any source for that?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now