Camera - Low Light Evaluation - Night Sight

Low-light capture was a forte for Huawei this year, as they were the first to introduce a low-light mode that was able to capture vastly superior exposure shots without having to use a tripod. The results on the P20’s were excellent, so let’s see how the new Mate 20’s fare.

Click for full image
Mate 20Pro     ] - Mate 20   ] - P20Pro   ]
P20   ] - Mate 10Pro   ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ Pixel 2 ]
[ Pixel XL ] - [ iPhone XS ] - [ iPhone X ] - [ Note9 ] - [ S9+ ] - [ S8 ]
 [ LG G7 ] - [ LG V30 ] - [ OnePlus 6 ] - [ OPPO FindX ] - [ MIX2S ]

In the first scene, the Mate 20 Pro goes off to a bad start as noted focus issues when capturing the scene. Here the phone multiple times took out of focus captures, with none of my night mode shots actually ending up in focus. In the regular mode, the Mate 20 Pro’s camera switches over to its unique high ISO mode and is able to deliver great results at ISO25600. We have to remember that the phones don’t actually have OIS, so again like on the P20 Pro this is quite remarkable. Also a big change compared to the P20 Pro is the colour rendition, here the Mate 20 Pro is able to extract much better colours out of the scene, and all while reducing noise significantly.

The Mate 20’s regular mode isn’t all that impressive as pretty much in line with how most sensors behave in low light. Here turning on Night mode is a requirement, and greatly improves the picture quality.

Google’s new Night Sight mode outmatches Huawei’s phones in terms of light capture, noise and detail retention, however the images is so bright that it’s less natural than the Mate’s results.

Click for full image
Mate 20Pro   ] - Mate 20    ] - P20Pro   ] - P20   ]
Mate 10Pro  ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ Pixel 2 ] - [ Pixel XL ]
[ iPhone XS ] - [ iPhone X ] - [ Note9 ] - [ S9+ ] - [ S8 ]
[ LG G7 ] - [ LG V30 ] - [ OnePlus 6 ] - [ OPPO FindX ] - [ MIX2S ]

The second scene the Mate 20 Pro does a very different exposure to the P20 Pro, the latter did a much more accurate representation of the brightness and colour temperature of the sodium street lamps. Turning on night mode improved things a lot for both phones.

Overall the Mate 20’s are among the best low light shooters thanks to night mode, only recently dethroned by Google’s Pixel phones.

Click for full image
Mate 20Pro    ] - Mate 20   ] - P20   ]
Mate 10Pro   ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ Pixel 2 ] - [ Pixel XL ]
iPhone XS ] - [ iPhone X ] - [ Note9 [ S9+ ] - [ S8 ]
[ LG V30 ] - [ OnePlus 6 ] - [ OPPO FindX ]

The next scene the Mate 20 Pro varies in its results while in auto mode. The first shot has better dynamic range and also better detail retention, here Huawei needs a way to keep things more consistent. The regular mode on the Mate 20 is also good, although it’s lacking in texture detail as well showing some very weird blur in the right part of the image. Here I think the lack of OIS is hampering the phones.

Turning on night mode again improves the quality, but again the regular Mate 20 is giving out some blurred results here as its multi-frame stacking doesn’t seem to work correctly.

I would say the Mate 20 Pro along with the Pixel’s Night Sight modes are leading closely together.

Click for full image
Mate 20Pro   ] - Mate 20   ] - P20Pro   ] - P20   ]
Mate 10Pro   ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ Pixel 2 ] - [ Pixel XL ]
[ iPhone XS ] - [ iPhone X ] - [ Note9 ] - [ S9+ ] - [ S8 ]
[ LG G7 ] - [ LG V30 ] - [ OnePlus 6 ] - [ OPPO FindX ] - [ MIX2S ]

Partial blurriness is again an issue of the Mate 20 in this scene. The Mate 20 Pro doesn’t have any issue in this regard, and captures the best regular mode shot among all phones.

Switching to night mode, it brightens up things for both units, and also resolves the blurriness issue on the Mate 20. Although Huawei’s phones are showcasing more realistic exposures, the Pixel phones night mode outclass them in terms of detail retention.

Click for full image
Mate 20Pro   ] - Mate 20   ] - P20Pro   ] - P20   ]
Mate 10Pro   ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ Pixel 2 ] - [ Pixel XL ]
[ iPhone XS ] - [ iPhone X ] - [ Note9 ] - [ S9+ ] - [ S8 ]
[ LG G7 ] - [ LG V30 ] - [ OnePlus 6 ] - [ OPPO FindX ] - [ MIX2S ]

This scene again showcases some big blur issues on the regular Mate 20’s auto shots that are only resolved by turning on night mode. The Mate 20 Pro’s auto mode here produces the most natural result out of all phones.

In night mode, things brighten up a bunch, and Huawei manages much better results than other devices, but is yet again beat by Google’s new software.

Extreme low-light

Extreme low light scenarios is something as early as last year we wouldn’t have expected phones to be viable in. Again I started shooting such scenes earlier in the year when Huawei made its Night mode usable without a tripod – along with vendors like LG introducing pixel binning modes that quadruple the light capture of the sensors.

Click for full image
Mate 20Pro   ] - Mate 20   ] - P20Pro   ] - P20   ]
Mate 10Pro  ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ Pixel 2 ] - [ Pixel XL ]
 [ iPhone XS ] - [ iPhone X [ Note9 ] - [ S9+ ] - [ S8 ]
 [ LG G7 ] - [ LG V30 ] - [ OnePlus 6 ] - [ OPPO FindX ] - [ MIX2S ]

In extreme low light scenarios, the Huawei phones were in a league of their own until just very recently. The Mate 20 Pro in its regular mode relies on ISO25600 to achieve a very good shot, beating all other phones including the P20Pro. The Mate 20 doesn’t fare as well here as its sensor just can’t capture enough light.

In night mode, the Mate 20 Pro gains in sharpness and sheds some of the noise, and the Mate 20 now manages to sufficiently light up the scene, although sharpness and detail aren’t too good. Although the Huawei again have a better natural reproduction of the light in the scene, Google’s night sight just produces a just ridiculously brighter scene that offers significantly better details.

Click for full image
[ Mate 20Pro ] - [ Mate 20 ] - [ P20Pro ] - [ Mate 10Pro ]
Pixel 3   ] - Pixel 2    ] - Pixel XL    ]
[ iPhone XS ] - [ iPhone X ] - [ Note9 ] - [ S9+ ] - [ S8 ]
[ LG G7 ] - [ LG V30 ] - [ OnePlus 6 ] - [ OPPO FindX ] - [ MIX2S ]

Finally, in the darkest possible conditions, in a path under the light of the moon, the Mate 20 Pro and P20 Pro are the only camera sensors able to capture anything, with the Mate 20 Pro using its maximum ISO102400 mode. The Mate 20 largely remains blind. Night mode on the Mate 20 Pro actually regresses things in these conditions, while on the Mate 20 it allows to finally make out some parts of the scene.

Again both phones are beat by Google’s new night sight, achieving some pretty astounding results.

Low-light conclusion

Overall in low light conditions, the Mate 20 Pro is a clear leader in terms of its hardware capabilities. Just like on the P20 Pro, the massive sensor as well as is high ISO capabilities prove very beneficial for the phone.

The Mate 20 fared less well in regular mode, and underperforms most other flagships. Here the use of night mode is a requirement to get better shots out of the phone.

Up until recently this would have been the end of my conclusion, but the recent introduction of Google’s new night sight mode means that Huawei no longer is the best in low-light conditions. While I do feel that Google is overdoing it a bit and Huawei still produces the more realistic and representative exposures, the Pixel phones just have a tremendous detail and noise reduction advantage. Still, this is not to take away from Huawei’s great low-light performances, as it still stands above that of many other devices.

Camera - Daylight Evaluation Camera Video Recording
Comments Locked

141 Comments

View All Comments

  • tuxRoller - Saturday, November 17, 2018 - link

    First, these phones are, at best, based on 4.14.
    Second, 4.20 is at least a month from release.
    Third, what's Intel got to do with an article about a Huawei phone?
  • GreenReaper - Sunday, November 18, 2018 - link

    They backported it to stable, too; but I agree, it's a little off-topic.
  • tuxRoller - Monday, November 19, 2018 - link

    OK. Not sure what happened to my comment...
    4.19 will, (very) likely, be the next base for aosp. So yes, currently that's stable. Of greater issue is that I see this patch being reverted (though something is going to get pulled). That was why I mentioned that 4.20 still has a month (or more) until it's released.
  • Beararam - Saturday, November 17, 2018 - link

    https://threader(dot)app/thread/1051204370543648770

    ?
  • Sanyogita - Saturday, November 17, 2018 - link

    I know NOMU has been working on rugged phones for a long time, and this time the new product looks great and has a high level of protection.
    https://nomu.hk/
  • stanere - Saturday, November 17, 2018 - link

    >also finally Huawei’s first phone to push beyond 1080p

    honor 8 pro and mate 9 pro had 2560x1440 screen
  • asfletch - Sunday, November 18, 2018 - link

    Yep - and the Mate 10, which Andrei clearly has access to (official specs: https://consumer.huawei.com/au/phones/mate10/specs... Rest of the review was great, but odd oversight there.

    Incidentally, does Mate 20 not have the CABC issue? I remember the Mate 10 (LCD) suffering from it.... It's unfortunate about Huawei's CABC/calibration issues, because when I actually look at the Mate 20 in stores here, the screen is superficially very impressive. I don't know whether it's the lamination process or glass treatment or something, but IMHO icons/text really look 'printed on' in a way which eludes most other phone screens. M20 Pro has similar quality in this regard to my eyes, but I can't deal with curved screen edges.

    (As an aside, a flat Galaxy S9 would have been my ideal phone and I was disappointed when the S9 Active was cancelled. These Mates and other top contenders are just huge).
  • Dan86 - Saturday, November 17, 2018 - link

    Looks impressive, but, we shouldn't be buying Chinese crap, made by stealing intelectual property, cloning the note 9, and to make everything worst they will spy on you and store your data in a country were privacy doesnt exist due to the government power over companies, do you really want to buy this phone ???
  • halcyon - Saturday, November 17, 2018 - link

    Why shouldn't we? All companies steal IP (read Snowden's revelations, how NSA backdoors are used for industrial espionage). Chinese are not different. And USA/NSA read all your emails, SMS, listen on your phone doors and backdoor your Android phones.

    Just buy a phone that you are happy with. Leave the nationalistic politics for everybody else to decide (many nationalities, many points-of-view).

    I'd buy Huawei Mate 20X, IF they allowed bootloader unlocking AND IF it was availabe in the 8GB/256GB model outside China (it is not).

    The nano memory card is a proprietary joke at 128GB (current) max size, imho.

    And lack of 3.5mm headphone on the Mate20Pro totally kills it for me.

    Spying I couldn't care less about - there's nothing I can do abou it, whether on Samsung, Pixel, LG, Xiaomi or other device. Only if I buy a fully unlocked, rootable phone where I install LineageOS custom ROM (with crap camera drivers) can I *maybe* avoid some snooping. Even then, all the Google apps spy on me.

    So, choose your poison, but don't expect that others are not poison too.
  • shompa - Sunday, November 18, 2018 - link

    Dear Dan86. You are what's called a real racist. BTW: you know that every single phone is MADE in China? There are no fabs in US/EU. Intellectual property is a construct. You should ask why all this stuff is not made in your country (and I can give you a hint: it have nothing to do with the workforce like the politicians/companies says)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now