Board Features

Motherboards in this category are all about balancing cost and features. ASUS cements the B360-G Gaming as a high quality contender in the mATX space with its Intel network controller, a full set of DRAM slots, a custom Realtek audio codec, dual M.2 slots, and all six chipset-supported SATA ports. Bundle all the regular features on top, and some USB 3.1, and all that is missing is a Wi-Fi module.

ASUS B360-G Gaming
Warranty Period 3 Years
Product Page LINK
Price $100 (Amazon) 
Size MicroATX
CPU Interface LGA1151
Chipset Intel B360
Memory Slots (DDR4) Four DDR4
Dual Channel
Supporting 64GB
Up to DDR4 2666
Network Connectivity / Wi-Fi 1 x Intel I219V GbE
Onboard Audio SupremeFX S1220A 7.1ch surround
Video Outputs 1 x HDMI
1 x DVI-D
PCIe Slots for Graphics (from CPU)  1 x PCIe 3.0 (x16)
PCIe Slots for Other (from PCH) 1 x PCIe 3.0 (x4 max)
2 x PCIe 3.0/2.0 (x1)
Onboard SATA 6 x SATA 6 Gbps
Onboard SATA Express None
Onboard M.2 2 x PCIe 3.0 x4 and SATA modes
Onboard U.2 None
USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) 2 x Type-A back panel
USB 3.0 (5 Gbps - includes 3.1 Gen 1) 2 x back panel
2 x via internal header
USB 2.0 2 x back panel
4 x via internal header
Power Connectors 1 x 24-pin ATX
1 x 8-pin CPU
Fan Headers 1 x 4-pin CPU 
2 x 4-pin Chassis
1 x 4-pin AIO_Pump
Back IO Panel 1 x PS/2 Mouse/Keyboard port
1 x DVI-D
1 x HDMI
2 x USB 3.1 Type-A ports (10 Gbps)
2 x USB 3.0 
2 x USB 2.0
1 x Optical S/PDIF
5 x Audio Jacks
1 x RJ-45

That being said, Wi-Fi is a really cost sensitive option in this market. Speaking with other vendors, they say that adding Wi-Fi can increase the base manufacturing and bundling cost by $15 to the user, which is essentially a price bracket difference in this market segment. ASUS are sticking with a gaming theme here, and most users should be covered with the B360-G Gaming on-paper features. It all comes down to the benchmarks.

Test Bed

As per our testing policy, we take a high-end CPU suitable for the motherboard that was released during the socket’s initial launch and equip the system with a suitable amount of memory running at the processor maximum supported frequency. This is also typically run at JEDEC sub timings where possible. It is noted that some users are not keen on this policy, stating that sometimes the maximum supported frequency is quite low, or faster memory is available at a similar price, or that the JEDEC speeds can be prohibitive for performance. While these comments make sense, ultimately very few users apply memory profiles (either XMP or other) as they require interaction with the BIOS, and most users will fall back on JEDEC supported speeds - this includes home users as well as industry who might want to shave off a cent or two from the cost or stay within the margins set by the manufacturer. Where possible, we will extend our testing to include faster memory modules either at the same time as the review or a later date.

Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives, in essence, an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency/monitoring priority, overriding memory sub-timings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.

Test Setup
Processor Intel i7 8700K (6C/12T, 3.7G, 95W)
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B360G-Gaming-ITX/ac (BIOS 0802)
Cooling Corsair H115i
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x8GB DDR4 2666 CL16
Corsair Vengeance 4x4GB DDR4 3200 CL16

used in 2x 4/8GB capacity on dual Channel Platform
Memory Settings DDR4 2666 CL16-18-18-35 2T
Video Cards ASUS Strix GTX 980
Hard Drive Crucial MX300 1TB
Optical Drive TSST TS-H653G
Case Open Test Bed
Operating System Windows 10 Pro 64-bit

Many thanks to...

We must thank the following companies for kindly providing hardware for our multiple test beds. Some of this hardware is not in this testbed specifically but is used in other testing.

Thank you to ASUS for providing us with GTX 980 Strix GPUs. At the time of release, the STRIX brand from ASUS was aimed at silent running, or to use the marketing term: '0dB Silent Gaming'. This enables the card to disable the fans when the GPU is dealing with low loads well within temperature specifications. These cards equip the GTX 980 silicon with ASUS' Direct CU II cooler and 10-phase digital VRMs, aimed at high-efficiency conversion. Along with the card, ASUS bundles GPU Tweak software for overclocking and streaming assistance.

The GTX 980 uses NVIDIA's GM204 silicon die, built upon their Maxwell architecture. This die is 5.2 billion transistors for a die size of 298 mm2, built on TMSC's 28nm process. A GTX 980 uses the full GM204 core, with 2048 CUDA Cores and 64 ROPs with a 256-bit memory bus to GDDR5. The official power rating for the GTX 980 is 165W.

The ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB (or the full name of STRIX-GTX980-DC2OC-4GD5) runs a reasonable overclock over a reference GTX 980 card, with frequencies in the range of 1178-1279 MHz. The memory runs at stock, in this case, 7010 MHz. Video outputs include three DisplayPort connectors, one HDMI 2.0 connector, and a DVI-I.

Further Reading: AnandTech's NVIDIA GTX 980 Review

 

Thank you to Crucial for providing us with MX300 SSDs. Crucial stepped up to the plate as our benchmark list grows larger with newer benchmarks and titles, and the 1TB MX300 units are strong performers. Based on Marvell's 88SS1074 controller and using Micron's 384Gbit 32-layer 3D TLC NAND, these are 7mm high, 2.5-inch drives rated for 92K random read IOPS and 530/510 MB/s sequential read and write speeds.

The 1TB models we are using here support TCG Opal 2.0 and IEEE-1667 (eDrive) encryption and have a 360TB rated endurance with a three-year warranty.

Further Reading: AnandTech's Crucial MX300 (750 GB) Review

 

Thank you to Corsair for providing us with Vengeance LPX DDR4 Memory, HX750 Power Supply, and H115i CPU Cooler

Corsair kindly sent a 4x8GB DDR4 2666 set of their Vengeance LPX low profile, high-performance memory for our stock testing. The heatsink is made of pure aluminum to help remove heat from the sticks and has an eight-layer PCB. The heatsink is a low profile design to help fit in spaces where there may not be room for a tall heat spreader; think a SFF case or using a large heatsink. Timings on this specific set come in at 16-18-18-35. The Vengeance LPX line supports XMP 2.0 profiles for easily setting the speed and timings. It also comes with a limited lifetime warranty. 

Powering the test system is Corsair's HX750 Power Supply. This HX750 is a dual mode unit able to switch from a single 12V rail (62.5A/750W) to a five rail CPU (40A max ea.) and is also fully modular. It has a typical selection of connectors, including dual EPS 4+4 pin four PCIe connectors and a whopping 16 SATA power leads, as well as four 4-pin Molex connectors.

The 135mm fluid dynamic bearing fan remains off until it is 40% loaded offering complete silence in light workloads. The HX750 comes with a ten-year warranty. 

In order to cool these CPUs, Corsair sent over its latest and largest AIO in the H115i. This closed-loop system uses a 280mm radiator with 2x140mm SP140L PWM controlled fans. The pump/block combination mounts to all modern CPU sockets. Users are also able to integrate this cooler into the Corsair link software via USB for more control and options. 

BIOS and Software System Peformance
Comments Locked

26 Comments

View All Comments

  • Threska - Tuesday, September 25, 2018 - link

    Diagnostic displays come in handy when builds go south, or hardware dies. As for the mATX, I imagine much like houses, people are downsizing, so the computer doesn't eat the desk.
  • Samus - Tuesday, September 25, 2018 - link

    Yep. Throw it in a black case and move on. Who cares what the internals of a PC look like if you never see them.
  • Holliday75 - Tuesday, September 25, 2018 - link

    Yup thinking the same thing. If I was building a new Intel box right now I would probably purchase this board and never look at it again unless I was adding a drive or fixing something.
  • Oxford Guy - Wednesday, September 26, 2018 - link

    You do see them. Black-on-black is the bane of the computer installer's life. Board makers used to understand this and color-coded everything. Instead of ease-of-use, though, we have to be teenybopper edgelords these days. Skulls on SSDs coupled with Rainbow Brite LEDs.
  • V900 - Thursday, September 27, 2018 - link

    Oh you poor, naive fool!

    How will you communicate the fact that you like to game to people, with the case all locked up like that, hmm?

    Didn't think about that, did you?

    You know what people who come to visit you will think?

    "That Samus guy is kinda cool, just too bad he's not a gamer!" Yup! Thats exactly what theyll think.
  • desolation0 - Friday, September 28, 2018 - link

    If they don't get it from the original Unreal flyby benchmark test as screensaver I'm not sure they can be helped.
  • willis936 - Tuesday, September 25, 2018 - link

    In the DPC Latency section of the System Performance page:
    "Our DPC latency results for the B360-G Gaming 122 µs which is about par for the course after our minor script adjustments."

    Compared to the last ryzen mobo review (asrock x470):
    https://www.anandtech.com/show/12666/the-asrock-x4...
    "While none of the manufacturers of the boards tested on the AM4 socket so far have been optimized for DPC latency,"

    Am I to understand that sub 100 us is being considered "not optimized for DPC latency" while only two of the current list of coffee lake tested mobos approach 100 us are?

    Is this an oversight or is there something I'm missing? It looks like the AM4 platform is currently ahead of coffee lake in terms of DPC latency.
  • Oxford Guy - Wednesday, September 26, 2018 - link

    I wasn't sure what motherboard I could but that would let me play computer games. So, when I saw Gaming in the title I knew it was the board I needed.
  • Oxford Guy - Wednesday, September 26, 2018 - link

    I would like to suggest to these manufacturers, though, that they strongly consider putting a bleeding severed head on the plastic heatsinks, and prominently on the packaging also. Bleeding severed heads compliment SSDs with skulls on them and encourage people to think positively about the product.
  • 96redformula - Thursday, September 27, 2018 - link

    I couldn't resist picking one up in my Mobo search a week ago a half ago at $90 shipped to the door. The text is non existent once it goes into a case, no big deal, but it sure did make me rethink it when I was purchasing it. The video card and aftermarket HSF cover it all just fine :)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now