Test Bed and Setup

As per our testing policy, we take a high-end CPU suitable for the motherboard that was released during the socket’s initial launch and equip the system with a suitable amount of memory running at the processor maximum supported frequency. This is also typically run at JEDEC subtimings where possible. It is noted that some users are not keen on this policy, stating that sometimes the maximum supported frequency is quite low, or faster memory is available at a similar price, or that the JEDEC speeds can be prohibitive for performance. While these comments make sense, ultimately very few users apply memory profiles (either XMP or other) as they require interaction with the BIOS, and most users will fall back on JEDEC supported speeds - this includes home users as well as industry who might want to shave off a cent or two from the cost or stay within the margins set by the manufacturer. Where possible, we will extend out testing to include faster memory modules either at the same time as the review or a later date.

Test Setup
Processor AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X,
16 Cores, 32 Threads, 3.4 GHz (4.0 GHz Boost)
Motherboards ASUS X399 ROG Zenith Extreme (BIOS 0304)
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S TR4-SP3
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i Platinum PSU
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 32GB (4 x 8GB)
DDR4 DRAM 2666MHz
Memory Settings XMP @ 2666
Video Cards ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570
Hard Drive Crucial MX200 1TB
Case Open Test Bed
Operating System Windows 10 Build 1803 64-bit

Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives in essence an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the stock BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency / monitoring priority, overriding memory sub-timings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.

ASUS X399 ROG Zenith Extreme has all of its BIOS options set to Auto by default. "Auto" for options like "Overclocking Enhancement", "Ai Overclock Tuner", and "Core Performance Boost" clearly means "On" for ASUS, as the motherboard is temporarily pushing the Ryzen Threadripper processor above 4100 MHz during benchmarking and performance tests. Furthermore, the motherboard seems to be pushing the BCLK frequency a little alongside with the CPU's multiplier, resulting to a little higher system bandwidth and CPU clock speed. So aggressive the default overclocking settings of the ASUS X399 ROG Zenith Extreme are that the BIOS by default kept our Ryzen Threadripper 1950X processor at above 4000 MHz permanently while we were checking the BIOS.

Users will note that we are using an RX 570 graphics card here, which is not 'the best of the best' for a high-end platform like Threadripper. This was ultimately down to logistics at the time of testing; our gaming tests rarely become more than a checkbox to ensure that no fishy business is going on.

Many thanks to...

We must thank the following companies for kindly providing hardware for our multiple test beds. Some of this hardware is not in this test bed specifically, but is used in other testing.

Thank you to Crucial for providing us with MX200/MX300 SSDs. Crucial stepped up to the plate as our benchmark list grows larger with newer benchmarks and titles, and the 1TB units are strong performers. The MX200s are based on Marvell's 88SS9189 controller and using Micron's 16nm 128Gbit MLC flash, these are 7mm high, 2.5-inch drives rated for 100K random read IOPs and 555/500 MB/s sequential read and write speeds. The 1TB models we are using here support TCG Opal 2.0 and IEEE-1667 (eDrive) encryption and have a 320TB rated endurance with a three-year warranty.

Further Reading: AnandTech's Crucial MX200 (250 GB, 500 GB & 1TB) Review

Thank you to Corsair for providing us with Vengeance LPX DDR4 Memory and an AX1200i Power Supply.

Corsair kindly sent a 4x8GB DDR4 2666 set of their Vengeance LPX low profile, high-performance memory. The heatsink is made of pure aluminum to help remove heat from the sticks and has an eight-layer PCB. The heatsink is a low profile design to help fit in spaces where there may not be room for a tall heat spreader; think a SFF case or using a large heatsink. Timings on this specific set come in at 16-18-18-35. The Vengeance LPX line supports XMP 2.0 profiles for easily setting the speed and timings. It also comes with a limited lifetime warranty.

Further Reading: AnandTech's Memory Frequency Scaling on Intel's Skull Canyon NUC

The AX1200i was the first power supply to offer digital control and management via Corsair's Link system, but under the hood it commands a 1200W rating at 50C with 80 PLUS Platinum certification. This allows for a minimum 89-92% efficiency at 115V and 90-94% at 230V. The AX1200i is completely modular, running the larger 200mm design, with a dual ball bearing 140mm fan to assist high-performance use. The AX1200i is designed to be a workhorse, with up to 8 PCIe connectors for suitable four-way GPU setups. The AX1200i also comes with a Zero RPM mode for the fan, which due to the design allows the fan to be switched off when the power supply is under 30% load.

Further Reading: AnandTech’s Best PC Power Supplies

Software System Performance
Comments Locked

25 Comments

View All Comments

  • Xajel - Sunday, July 22, 2018 - link

    Other than not prepared for Threadripper 2000 series. the things that bothers me with this is the M.2 daughter board is kinda not cool. and the fact that it is a massive E-ATX motherboard, and sadly all ASUS's TR4 mobos are E-ATX.
  • Vikka Dhamtan - Tuesday, August 7, 2018 - link

    <b><a href="https://www.rrbresultz.in/">RRB Result</a></b>
  • Vikka Dhamtan - Tuesday, August 7, 2018 - link

    <b><a href="https://www.rrbresultz.in/answer-key/">RRB Answer Key</a></b>
  • EndUser2019 - Sunday, January 13, 2019 - link

    I am still looking to move to thread-ripper but I am looking at the Retail price of this and the fact not a single vendor is selling it @ its retail of around $550 ... more like $750 from where I typically buy my PC parts... or stores are not carrying it at all ... Did the bad press from people who 'didn't know what they were doing' flame this board into submission ? .... Though I will say the idea they would use an air cooler on such a processor and then overclock it seems strange to me as to me this sort of chip and board screams out loud 'WATER-COOLING not Optional' ... yeah yeah I know you can run processors hot and they are designed for it but if you intend to go beyond stock it seems like a 'no duh!' to slap a waterblock on this sucker ...

    I don't know about everyone else but running a room dedicated AC to keep the temps of the room tolerable is not something everyone wants and if your system is running 80*C for hours you can bet that room is going to get uncomfortable in the summer -if you have house AC maybe no issue but I don't have such a thing yet but when my furnace goes out I'll be setting up to do an AC hookup while I dropping that cash...Since I think about cooling I know I can attribute my long over time system stability to the fact I don't let me system get crazy hot where a few additions can keep it much happier... and no I am not talking about a dozen case fans going full blast as that noise is irritating not only to myself but anyone around to hear it or anyone who hears it in my voice chat...

    Still I am happy AMD is back and is swinging hard at intel to knock them out of complacency ... for that reason I know my next build is going to be a return to AMD for me here but I'll probably be adopting when the 3k series ryzen's come out ... my poor i7 3770 is holding on for most what I do mostly minus VM's but its showing its age and I'd really like to get some more overhead and 16 cores would certainly cut down the times I need to just leave my computer on chewing on renders all night -_-
  • dirty earnie - Monday, August 1, 2022 - link

    Yeh,top tier until it breaks then Asus comes up with 12 thousand excuses why it is not their fault and refuse to RMA it!!! Will never buy anything else that says Asus on it.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now