Physical Design and Features

Starting with appearances, the design of the PG27UQ is, to put colloquially, quite thick. This would typically be an area where different companies can distinguish between similar products, in this case meaning Asus and Acer, but the dimensions are a consequence of the AUO LCD/backlight unit, the G-Sync HDR module, and HSF assembly.

And yes, a heatsink and fan. Topping the bulkness off is the aforementioned active cooling with the fan, located behind the stand/VESA mount point. The fan's behavior is not really documented, but it runs during standby and sometimes when the monitor is powered off - the latter behavior had me slightly confused on first use, as the fan spun up once I plugged in the monitor. Thankfully, the noise levels are low enough that it should only be a concern for fanless/silent configurations.


PCPerspective's photo of the FPGA module and fan

A teardown by PCPer revealed an Altera Arria 10 GX 480 FPGA with 3GB DDR4-2400 RAM, a substantial upgrade from the Altera Arria V GX FPGA with 768MB DDR3L of the original G-Sync module. NVIDIA stated that, like previous iterations, the module does not replace the TCON and does not support VESA DSC. The latter has been suggested as a solution to the bandwidth limitations of combined high res/high refresh/HDR, and we know that DisplayPort 1.4 includes the DSC standard. Implementing DSC for G-Sync may or may not add latency, but NVIDIA probably explored that option before going with the current implementation of chroma subsampling past 98Hz.

More interestingly, NVIDIA also mentioned that the G-Sync HDR module uses eDP to interface with the LCD panel, as opposed to the first generation’s LVDS, which is an aged standard nowadays. In general, eDP provides higher bandwidth, requiring fewer PCB traces and signal wires overall, and so consumes less power. Except in this case, the overall power usage and/or heat generation requires a blower fan.

It’s been reported that the 27-inch panel will come in a non-HDR variant without the FALD backlight, but the price reduction is harder to guess, since the G-Sync HDR module and quantum dot film would likely still be used. The panel will presumably have an eDP interface, which wouldn’t be compatible with the LVDS-only capability of the first generation G-Sync modules. At the least, there likely wouldn’t be a need for active cooling anymore.

So in contrast with the modern trend of smaller screen borders, the PG27UQ bezels are noticeable at around 15mm at the sides and around 20mm on the top and bottom. The three-point stand is large and the unit as a whole is on the heavier side, just a little over 20 pounds. That stand actually allows for underside LEDs, which can project a logo on the desk below, and the monitor comes with customizable blank plastic covers for this purpose. This falls under the "LIGHT IN MOTION" OSD, and a separate "Aura RGB" option governs LEDs for the ROG logo at the back of the stand. Alternatively, Aura Sync can be enabled to control the "Aura RBG" lighting.

Similarly, the ROG logo can be projected rearwards by the "ROG Light Signal," the last bit in the monitor's bling kit. The power LED also does turn red, but this is to indicate that the monitor is in G-Sync model; it is white during standard operation and amber during standby.

Also at the top of the monitor is an ambient light sensor, which is used with auto-adjusting SDR brightness ('Auto SDR Brightness') and blackness (Auto Black Level) settings in the OSD.

Connectivity is as minimal as it gets without being a big issue: 1 x DisplayPort 1.4, 1 HDMI 2.0 port, an audio jack, and a 2-port USB 3.0 hub. By standards of a premium monitor, it’s certainly not ideal; even if the panel specifications and features are the main attraction over connectivity, the $2000 price point hardly suggests minimal connections. The configuration is identical with Acer's X27 so I'm not sure if there was much Asus could do, unless the reasoning was primarily about margins (if so, then it might indicate that development/panel/module expenses are higher).

The stand and mount combine to offer a good range of adjustment options.

In terms of the on-screen display (OSD), the PG27UQ comes with several SDR picture mode presets called 'GameVisual' as it uses GameVisual Video Intelligence. The modes are as follows:

  • Racing (default): intended for input lag reduction
  • Scenery: intended for more constrast gradations. Also sets monitor to 100% brightness and locks gamma and Dark Boost (auto gamma curve adjustment)
  • Cinema: intended for saturated and cool colors. Also sets monitor to 'Cool' color temperature and locks gamma and Dark Boost
  • RTS/RPG: intended to enhance constrast sharpness and color saturation. Also sets gamma to 2.4 and Dark Boost to Level 1
  • FPS: intended for higher constrast. Also sets Level 3 Dark Boost
  • sRGB: intended for viewing photos and graphics on PCs. Also locks color temperature, brightness, contrast, and gamma

Switching to HDR mode disables GameVisual, and locks gamma, dark boost, variable backlight, and Auto SDR Brightness.

Meanwhile, a separate 'GamePlus' button brings up options for gaming-oriented OSD overlays: crosshair, timer, FPS counter, and screen alignment markers for multi-monitor setup.

The (Asus) G-Sync HDR Experience: Premium Panel for Premium Price Brightness and Contrast
Comments Locked

91 Comments

View All Comments

  • DanNeely - Tuesday, October 2, 2018 - link

    Because I use the same system for gaming and general desktop use. My main display is my biggest and best monitor and thus used for both. At some hypothetical point in time if I had a pair of high end displays as my both my center and as one of my side displays having different ones as my gaming and desktop use might be an option. But because I'd still be using the other as a secondary display not switching off/absolutely ignoring it, I'd still probably want my main screen to be the center one for both roles so I'd have secondaries to either side; so I'd probably still want the same for both. If I were to end up with both a 4k display and an ultrawide - in which case the best one to game on would vary by title it might become a moot point. (Or I could go 4 screens with small ones on each side and 2 copies of my chat app open I suppose.)
  • Impulses - Tuesday, October 2, 2018 - link

    Still using the 32" Predator?
  • edzieba - Tuesday, October 2, 2018 - link

    "Why not get an equally capable OLED/QLED at a much bigger size for less money ?"

    Because there are no feature equivalent devices.

    TVs do not actually accept an update rate of 120Hz, they will operate at 60Hz and either just do double-pulse backlighting or add their own internal interpolation. QLED 'HDR' desktop monitors lack the FALD backlight, so are not HDR monitors (just SDR panels that accept and compress a HDR signal).
  • wolrah - Tuesday, October 2, 2018 - link

    A small subset of TVs actually do support native 120Hz inputs, but so far I've only seen that supported at 1080p due to HDMI bandwidth limitations.

    For a while it was just a few specific Sony models that supported proper 1080p120 but all the 2017/2018 LG OLEDs do as well as some of the higher end Vizios and a few others.
  • resiroth - Monday, October 8, 2018 - link

    LG OLED TVs accept 120hz (and actually display true 120 FPS) but at a lower 1080p resolution. They also do 4K/60 of course. Not a great substitute though. If I were spending so much on a monitor I would demand it be oled though. Otherwise I’m spending 1500-1600 more than a 1440p monitor just to get 4K. I mean, cool? But why not go 2000-2500 more and get something actually unique, a 4K 144hz OLED HDR monitor that will be useful for 10 years or so.

    This thing will be obsolete the second oled monitors come out. There simply is no comparison.
  • Impulses - Tuesday, October 2, 2018 - link

    Regardless of all the technical refresh rate limitations already pointed out, not everyone wants to go that big. 40" is already kinda huge for a desktop display; anything larger takes over the desk, makes it tough to have any side displays, and forces a lot more window management that's just not optimal for people that use their PC for anything but gaming.

    I'd rather have a 1440p 165Hz 27" & 4K 32" on moving arms even than a single 4K 50"+ display with a lower DPI than even my old 1920x1200 24"...
  • lilkwarrior - Monday, October 8, 2018 - link

    To be fair, most would rather have a 4K ultra-wide (LG) or 1440p Ultrawide rather than multiple displays or a TV.

    5K is an exception since more room for controls for video work & etc is a good compromise for some to the productive convenience of more horizontal real estate an ultrawide provides.

    Most enthusiasts are waiting for HDMI 2.1 to upgrade, so this monitor & current TVs this year are DOA.
  • milkod2001 - Tuesday, October 2, 2018 - link

    This is nearly perfect. Still way overpriced what it is. I'd like to get similar but at 32'' size, 100Hz would be enough, don't need this fancy useless stand with holographic if price can be much cheaper, let it be factory calibrated, good enough for bit of Photoshop and also games. All at $1200 max. Wonder how long we have to wait for something like that.
  • milkod2001 - Tuesday, October 2, 2018 - link

    Forgot to mention it would obviously be 4k. The closest appears to be: BenQ PD3200U but it is only 60Hz monitor and 2017 model. Would want something newer and with 100Hz.
  • imaheadcase - Tuesday, October 2, 2018 - link

    To be fair, a mix of photoshop an also games at that screen res 60Hz would prob be enough since can't push modern games that high for MOST part. I have that Acer Z35P 120Hz monitor, and even with 1080Ti its hard pressed to get lots of games max it out. That is at 3440x1440.

    My 2nd "work" monitor next to it is the awesome Dell U3818DW (38 inches) @ 3840x1500 60Hz I actually prefer the dell to strategy games because of size, because FPS is not as huge concern.

    But playing Pubg on the Acer 120Hz will get 80-90fps

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now