Graphics Performance

Here’s where the Huawei MateBook X Pro stands out from the crowd. Most Ultrabooks rely on Intel’s UHD620 graphics, Huawei added in the NVIDIA GeForce MX150 GPU to the mix. With 384 CUDA cores, and 2 GB of GDDR5, the MX150 adds a bit more punch and it’s the first time we’ve had a chance to test it in a notebook.

One of the biggest advantages of having a discrete GPU is that you’re no longer forced inside of the thermal envelope of just the CPU. NVIDIA doesn’t release the TDP figures of its mobile chips, but you can expect the MX150 to likely have at least 15-Watts to itself. This also helps the CPU by not having to clock down as aggressively as when the GPU is integrated. Of course, this also requires adequate cooling to keep both chips in check.

To complicate matters, NVIDIA offers two different MX150 parts set up for different TDPs. Since this is in a thin and light ultrabook, it's perhaps not surprising to see that it features the lower speed version which has a maximum boost frequency of 1038 MHz. The higher TDP version for thicker laptops can boost to around 1500 MHz.

We’re in the process of transitioning to a new suite of games for 2018 and beyond, but because this laptop isn’t a gaming laptop, the games in our existing suite are more than demanding enough. But first, the synthetics.

3DMark

Futuremark 3DMark Fire Strike

Futuremark 3DMark Sky Diver

Futuremark 3DMark Cloud Gate

Futuremark 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited

Futuremark 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited - Graphics

Futuremark 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited - Physics

FutureMark’s 3DMark offers several tests with a variety of GPU demands. Fire Strike is the most demanding, then Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, and finally Ice Storm Unlimited which is designed for smartphones and tablet-class GPUs.

The NVIDIA MX150 offers a significant performance gain from the integrated GPU alone, and the more demanding the test, the larger the benefit. Fire Strike is an impressive 143% faster on the Huawei MateBook X Pro than the ASUS ZenBook 3 with the same CPU but just the UHD 620 graphics. On top of that, the MX150 also squeaks past the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U powered Acer Swift 3 with its Vega graphics.

GFXBench

GFXBench GL 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen

GFXBench GL 4.0 Manhattan 3.1 Offscreen

GFXBench GL 4.0 Manhattan 3.1 Offscreen

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen 1080p

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex Offscreen 1080p

Kishonti’s GFXBench is a cross-platform test that uses OpenGL on the desktop, and since most new PC games don’t use OpenGL, it’s really just a chance to see how the OpenGL drivers are for a GPU. Once again the MX150 does very well here compared to integrated alone.

Dota 2

Dota 2 Reborn - Value

Dota 2 Reborn - Mainstream

Dota 2 Reborn - Enthusiast

Valve’s Dota 2 is one of the most popular arena games around, and the engine is dynamic enough that it can be run fairly well on even low-end machines, making it a great game to test on an Ultrabook. The MateBook X Pro does very well on this test, easily outclassing the integrated GPUs on both the Intel and AMD laptops. The gap over the AMD Vega mobile likely has a lot to do with Dota 2 being a fairly CPU limited game, and having a separate TDP for the CPU and GPU like the MateBook does is a nice benefit.

Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider - Value

Tomb Raider - Mainstream

Tomb Raider - Enthusiast

Although several years old now, the original reboot of the Tomb Raider franchise can still be punishing to laptop GPUs. At low to medium settings though, the MX150 does very well on this game, and is more than just playable. It once again edges the Ryzen 7 2700U in the value settings where the CPU is a bigger factor, but that gap closes once the GPU is taxed a bit more in the medium settings. At our Enthusiast levels, no Ultrabook is playable.

Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider - Value

The sequel to Tomb Raider is even more demanding, and at our value settings is just averaging 30 FPS, meaning you’d really have to turn this game down to even have a chance to play it on an Ultrabook.

Civilization VI

Civilization VI Value

This game can normally be played with framerates that aren’t anywhere near a First Person game, thanks to the turn-based design of Civilization VI, but there were difficulties getting the game to run at our 16:9 resolutions we normally use, and the game was almost unplayable at even 1366x768. This is one of the issues you run into with an aspect ratio on the display which isn’t standard.

Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite - Value

Bioshock Infinite - Mainstream

Bioshock Infinite - Enthusiast

Like Tomb Raider, this game is several years old now but can still bring laptops to their knees, and we see that again with the MateBook X Pro. At low resolutions, it does very well, but on our enthusiast levels you’d not be able to play the game.

GRID Autosport

GRID Autosport - Value

GRID Autosport - Mainstream

GRID Autosport - Enthusiast

This game is heavily CPU bound, and you can see the gap between the MateBook and the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U powered Swift 3 is quite large. Once again, having separate TDPs helps, as does the extra performance from the Kaby Lake Refresh CPU.

GPU Conclusion

It was great to finally get a chance to test a laptop with the NVIDIA MX150 GPU inside, since Pascal has been such a big update on the bigger GPUs, it only makes sense that it’s also a big update over the GT 940 and other low-end GPUs NVIDIA offered previously. Offering this GPU in the MateBook X Pro provides it significantly more GPU power than Ultrabooks which rely on just the integrated Intel graphics, and it even outperforms the Vega GPU in the Acer Swift 3. There’s no free lunch here though, and Huawei would have had to pay extra for the GPU, and the bill of materials would also have to include the extra space and cooling required.

The MateBook X Pro isn’t a gaming laptop by any means, but with this small increase in GPU performance, it does at least give you the option.

System Performance Display Performance
Comments Locked

77 Comments

View All Comments

  • Brett Howse - Thursday, July 5, 2018 - link

    It does have Touch support. Sorry I meant to have that listed in the spec table. I've added it now.
  • dr.denton - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link

    Did I just miss it, or was there no mention of the inherent differences between a fully integrated APU and a CPU+GPU+dedicated graphics memory? To be honest, I don't find it particularly impressive to outperform a 15W R7 with a setup that surely is allowed more power budget, has more memory bandwidth and, I assume, is more expensive to manufacture.
  • s.yu - Saturday, July 21, 2018 - link

    Yup, this review is fairly disappointing, it's not as detailed as Notebookcheck's. Sometimes Anandtech does a better job but not this time.
  • s.yu - Saturday, July 21, 2018 - link

    This feels like an ad, why on earth is the base model's $1500 "undeniable value", as an ultrabook there's hardly anything of note besides the screen's brightness and resolution(sRGB coverage is basically standard for any ultrabook other than the cheapest, touch is also pretty common). The SSD is triple sourced and you can bet on the other variants to be slower, this speed is typically only seen in mid-high tier Samsungs, I've never seen Toshibas reach this speed for example. The thunderbolt is only two lanes, old problem, while Dell is already moving to fix that. Overall lack of ports for what's supposed to be a more pro-oriented model (they added the MX150, if only the slow version). No Windows hello? Xiaomi's new notebook among others are priced much more competitively for the specs.

    And the design is really mediocre, the up and down arrow keys for example should be full size, or the left and right should be half sized, as of now the pressure points of the side keys and the down key aren't in a straight line, I've tried such a keyboard before and was very annoyed by the differently sized arrow keys. The webcam placement is downplayed but its angle is even worse than the XPS solution, because it's closer to the user, also because it would be completely unusable on a stand/base commonly used to increase the number of ports and/or improve typing and screen-viewing comfort. From an aesthetic point of view it's also mediocre, choosing a somewhat dated roundish Macbook design (the recent design trend goes bolder, not only the Macbooks but also new XPSs and the new Blade follow this trend, even Xiaomi) and slapping a Huawei logo onto it.
  • RaymondIT - Tuesday, July 24, 2018 - link

    I still don't see why a higher end system like this is using slower memory that takes more power. LPDDR4 or even DDR4 would be a better choice. LPDDR4 uses 40% less power??
  • Joiiyrancher - Monday, October 8, 2018 - link

    Did you guys ever look into the reports that the thunderbolt 3 ports only provided 2 Lane support and therefore significantly compromised eGPU p performance? I think notebookcheck wrote about it. If that isn't the case I would buy one today.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now