Final Words

This review is really looking at two things. First, the Acer Swift 3, and second, the AMD Raven Ridge platform based on Ryzen mobile. Let’s start with the laptop.

Acer’s Swift lineup features models from the Swift 1 at the value end, to the Swift 7 at the top end. So, the Swift 3 is closer to the value end than Acer’s flagship models. But that’s somewhat deceptive because Acer’s Swift 3 is a nicely built device, with a great aluminum exterior, an IPS display, SSD storage, and even a fingerprint reader alongside the excellent trackpad.

It’s not all sunshine and roses for the Swift 3 though. The keyboard is not only cramped with the number pad squeezed in on the right, but the keys themselves are also very poor, with a slippery texture that makes it very easy to miss the key you’re looking for. It does feature backlighting, but the backlighting turns off quickly, and using the trackpad doesn’t light up the keys like it does on most laptops.

The small battery also cuts into the maximum life when not plugged in, and that’s purely a cost decision because there’s plenty of room inside a notebook this big for more battery. Plus, the high baseline power draw pulls down the battery life as well. Compared to a couple of years ago, the battery life is still quite good, but it’s definitely not all day by any means.

The display has great grayscale and white levels, but doesn’t even come close to covering the entire sRGB spectrum, which is something that most laptops do now. At 1920x1080, it does offer enough resolution at least, and of course it’s IPS which is a requirement at this point.

AMD’s Raven Ridge platform has done very well though. The CPU performance is much stronger than the outgoing Carrizo notebook platform, although it’s not quite up to the latest Kaby Lake in terms of absolute performance. But the addition of a real GPU onto the SoC is a welcome change, and allows actual 3D gaming even on a 15-Watt processor. The performance of the Vega GPU is so much better than the Intel integrated solution that really adds a lot of capability.

The combination of AMD’s Ryzen mobile, along with a good design, and excellent specifications for the price, really do make the Acer Swift 3 an appealing proposition. We’ve never tested a laptop at this price point with a 512 GB SSD before, and the 8 GB of DDR4 is very welcome as well at this price. If you can get over the poor quality keyboard, there’s a lot of laptop for the dollar here, and the ability to actually run real games is a welcome change.

Wireless, Speakers, Thermals, and Storage
Comments Locked

78 Comments

View All Comments

  • Brett Howse - Sunday, May 6, 2018 - link

    Intel is very aggressive on Turbo and Speed Shift has been a big improvement on their CPUs. Here's an article:
    https://www.anandtech.com/show/9751/examining-inte...

    The U series quads can ramp up to 30W for small workloads to get them done quicker. They've worked hard on this feature and it shows.
  • uberDoward - Thursday, May 3, 2018 - link

    'with one CPU Complex (CCX) of four course' Should be 'four cores'.
  • haplo602 - Friday, May 4, 2018 - link

    Hello Anandtech, which drivers did you use ? I'd suggest trying the latest Adrenaline drivers, you should see a 15-20% GPU performance increase ....
  • jcc5169 - Friday, May 4, 2018 - link

    This is what you get when a bunch of Intel fanboys review AMD products ....
  • Da W - Friday, May 4, 2018 - link

    Funny, these scores made me love my surface pro even more.
    Too bad it sits on the desk taking dust while i'm always on my desktop
  • samal90 - Friday, May 4, 2018 - link

    yeah that's the thing. When you have a desktop, a laptop is just good for traveling. I realized that for that for traveling though, I rather just have a cheap tablet to watch netflix
  • darkich - Friday, May 4, 2018 - link

    LOL those GFX manhattan scores are more than 50% lower than those of top smartphones!!..shows just how far behind pc tech is, relatively(not absolutely, for those who need spelling it out)
  • eddman - Sunday, May 6, 2018 - link

    PC tech is not behind even relatively, it's just that intel and AMD don't bother to put faster GPUs in their CPUs; except for a few intel laptop parts:

    https://gfxbench.com/compare.jsp?benchmark=gfx40&a...
  • Brett Howse - Sunday, May 6, 2018 - link

    Nothing to do with that. AMD's OpenGL drivers are clearly behind, and there's little reason for them to focus on OpenGL on the PC side. Plus you can't compare benchmarks across platforms like that, especially on the GPU side where PCs run at full precision and smartphones still run at half precision.
  • Farfolomew - Friday, May 4, 2018 - link

    Wow, what on earth is going on in the web benchmarks? An iPhone 8 scores almost 40k in Google Octane, and this can’t even get 25k. It also performs quite terribly in every other web benchmark tested.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now