Board Features

The MSI X299 Gaming M7 ACK is a high-end board from MSI sitting right up there with the flagship X299 XPower Gaming AC. The high-end board updates MSI's M.2 heatsinks with a more formidable cooling solution, dubbed M.2 Shield Frozr, which is attached to the chipset heatsink via a hinge. This is a unique implementation for such a board.

The board includes a bunch of RGB LEDs in multiple zones for lighting. It also uses dual Realtek ALC1220 codecs, one for the front panel and one for the rear, with Audio Boost 4 Pro parts. Networking comes from the Killer E2500 NIC for wired, and the Killer AC1535 for Wi-Fi. On the storage front there are eight SATA ports, two M.2 slots, as well as a U.2 port while on the USB side of things, support for both back panel USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) and front panel is included. Driving the CPU is a 10-phase VRM with robust Infineon(IR) power bits. Overall, quite a feature-laden board. 

MSI X299 Gaming M7 ACK
Warranty Period 3 Years
Product Page Link
Price $366 (Amazon)
Size ATX
CPU Interface LGA2066
Chipset Intel X299
Memory Slots (DDR4) Eight DDR4
Quad Channel
Supporting 128GB
Up to DDR4-4266
Network Connectivity 1 x Killer E2500 LAN
1 x Killer AC1535 802.11ac
Onboard Audio Dual Realtek ALC1220
PCIe Slots for Graphics (from CPU)  4 x PCIe 3.0
- 44 Lane CPU: x16/x4/x16/x8 
- 28 Lane CPU: x16/x4/x8/x0 or x8/x4/x8/x8
- 16 Lane CPU: x8/x0/x8/x0 or x8/x4/x4/x0
PCIe Slots for Other 2 x PCIe 3.0 x1
Onboard SATA 8 x RAID 0/1/5/10
Onboard SATA Express None
Onboard M.2 2 x PCIe 3.0 x4 and SATA modes
Onboard U.2 1 x PCIe 3.0 x4
USB 3.1 ASMedia ASM3142 
1 x Type-A Port (back panel)
1 x Type-C Port (back panel)
1 x Internal Header
USB 3.0 ASMedia ASM1074
3 x Type-A (back panel)

Chipset
1 x Type-A (back panel)
2 x Internal Headers
USB 2.0 Chipset
3 x Type-A (back Panel)
2 x Internal Headers
Power Connectors 1 x 24-pin ATX
1 x 8-pin CPU
1 x 4-pin CPU (optional)
Fan Headers 1 x 4-pin CPU
1 x 4-pin Water Pump
4 x 4-pin System Fans
IO Panel 1 x Clear CMOS
1 x BIOS Flashback+ button
1 x PS/2 Keyboard/mouse combo port
3 x USB 2.0 ports
2 x Wi-Fi Antenna connectors
4 x USB 3.1 (5 Gbps) ports
1 x LAN (RJ45) ports
1 x USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) Type-A port
1 x USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) Type-C port
1 x Optical S/PDIF OUT connector
5 x OFC audio jacks

Test Bed

As per our testing policy, we take a high-end CPU suitable for the motherboard that was released during the socket’s initial launch and equip the system with a suitable amount of memory running at the processor maximum supported frequency. This is also typically run at JEDEC sub timings where possible. It is noted that some users are not keen on this policy, stating that sometimes the maximum supported frequency is quite low, or faster memory is available at a similar price, or that the JEDEC speeds can be prohibitive for performance. While these comments make sense, ultimately very few users apply memory profiles (either XMP or other) as they require interaction with the BIOS, and most users will fall back on JEDEC supported speeds - this includes home users as well as industry who might want to shave off a cent or two from the cost or stay within the margins set by the manufacturer. Where possible, we will extend our testing to include faster memory modules either at the same time as the review or a later date.

Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives, in essence, an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency/monitoring priority, overriding memory sub-timings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.

Test Setup
Processor Intel i9 7900X (10C/20T, 3.3G, 140W)
Motherboard MSI X299M Gaming M7 ACK (BIOS v1.60)
Cooling Corsair H115i
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x8GB DDR4 2666 CL16
Corsair Vengeance 4x4GB DDR4 3200 CL16
Memory Settings DDR4 2666 CL16-18-18-35 2T
Video Cards ASUS Strix GTX 980
Hard Drive Crucial MX300 1TB
Optical Drive TSST TS-H653G
Case Open Test Bed
Operating System Windows 10 Pro 64-bit

Many thanks to...

We must thank the following companies for kindly providing hardware for our multiple test beds. Some of this hardware is not in this testbed specifically but is used in other testing.

Thank you to ASUS for providing us with GTX 980 Strix GPUs. At the time of release, the STRIX brand from ASUS was aimed at silent running, or to use the marketing term: '0dB Silent Gaming'. This enables the card to disable the fans when the GPU is dealing with low loads well within temperature specifications. These cards equip the GTX 980 silicon with ASUS' Direct CU II cooler and 10-phase digital VRMs, aimed at high-efficiency conversion. Along with the card, ASUS bundles GPU Tweak software for overclocking and streaming assistance.

The GTX 980 uses NVIDIA's GM204 silicon die, built upon their Maxwell architecture. This die is 5.2 billion transistors for a die size of 298 mm2, built on TMSC's 28nm process. A GTX 980 uses the full GM204 core, with 2048 CUDA Cores and 64 ROPs with a 256-bit memory bus to GDDR5. The official power rating for the GTX 980 is 165W.

The ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB (or the full name of STRIX-GTX980-DC2OC-4GD5) runs a reasonable overclock over a reference GTX 980 card, with frequencies in the range of 1178-1279 MHz. The memory runs at stock, in this case, 7010 MHz. Video outputs include three DisplayPort connectors, one HDMI 2.0 connector, and a DVI-I.

Further Reading: AnandTech's NVIDIA GTX 980 Review

 

Thank you to Crucial for providing us with MX300 SSDs. Crucial stepped up to the plate as our benchmark list grows larger with newer benchmarks and titles, and the 1TB MX300 units are strong performers. Based on Marvell's 88SS1074 controller and using Micron's 384Gbit 32-layer 3D TLC NAND, these are 7mm high, 2.5-inch drives rated for 92K random read IOPS and 530/510 MB/s sequential read and write speeds.

The 1TB models we are using here support TCG Opal 2.0 and IEEE-1667 (eDrive) encryption and have a 360TB rated endurance with a three-year warranty.

Further Reading: AnandTech's Crucial MX300 (750 GB) Review

 

Thank you to Corsair for providing us with Vengeance LPX DDR4 Memory, HX750 Power Supply, and H115i CPU Cooler

Corsair kindly sent a 4x8GB DDR4 2666 set of their Vengeance LPX low profile, high-performance memory for our stock testing. The heatsink is made of pure aluminum to help remove heat from the sticks and has an eight-layer PCB. The heatsink is a low profile design to help fit in spaces where there may not be room for a tall heat spreader; think a SFF case or using a large heatsink. Timings on this specific set come in at 16-18-18-35. The Vengeance LPX line supports XMP 2.0 profiles for easily setting the speed and timings. It also comes with a limited lifetime warranty. 

Powering the test system is Corsair's HX750 Power Supply. This HX750 is a dual mode unit able to switch from a single 12V rail (62.5A/750W) to a five rail CPU (40A max ea.) and is also fully modular. It has a typical selection of connectors, including dual EPS 4+4 pin four PCIe connectors and a whopping 16 SATA power leads, as well as four 4-pin Molex connectors.

The 135mm fluid dynamic bearing fan remains off until it is 40% loaded offering complete silence in light workloads. The HX750 comes with a ten-year warranty. 

In order to cool these high-TDP HEDT CPUs, Corsair sent over its latest and largest AIO in the H115i. This closed-loop system uses a 280mm radiator with 2x140mm SP140L PWM controlled fans. The pump/block combination mounts to all modern CPU sockets. Users are also able to integrate this cooler into the Corsair link software via USB for more control and options. 

BIOS and Software Benchmark Overview
Comments Locked

32 Comments

View All Comments

  • Diji1 - Wednesday, March 7, 2018 - link

    >don't buy that QoS bullshit, Ian, you're not stupid, if some idiot is shittorenting on ADSL no amount of qos

    So you've never used (or properly configured?) a device with QoS then I take it because if you had you wouldn't be dribbling inane stuff from your imagination like this.
  • karakarga - Wednesday, March 7, 2018 - link

    New mainboards may start to use Doby Atmos playback with 9.1.6 output. New UHD films may soon adapt to it. Buying an amplifier is really expensive for hearing it. Computer with the help of CPU may ease it for us.
  • PeachNCream - Monday, March 5, 2018 - link

    Lots of us have a very good understanding of networking so don't discount us as lacking the knowledge necessary to make sense of what Rivet Networks says their hardware is doing with respect to packet analysis and traffic prioritization. Maybe the specific implementation is unique to Killer NICs (I'd even argue that's not the case since they're moving to Intel hardware so if there is packet prioritization happening in hardware, it'll eventually be Intel's implementation with Rivet's interface atop it to allow user configuration). It also seems preconceived (alarmingly so) to assume the readers would just pop in to make negative comments if you go through the trouble of running benchmarks. I'd like to think there's value in what Anandtech publishes which is why most of us, even those with strongly negative opinions about Killer products, are here in the first place reading articles. Some of us don't clearly articulate why we don't like something though. Instead it might come off as general loathing, but I think the feedback you're getting here is rooted in the favorable light Killer is cast in without supporting data that's further combined with negative customer experiences of past Killer NIC products. If you'd like to address that perception and remain as outwardly positive quantified data that isn't marketing material direct from the company would go a long way because claims would have the necessary backing.

    I do worry though, that the Killer NIC's benefits can't be realized in benchmarks. If its the case that the key selling points aren't measurable, repeatable, or demonstrable then do they really exist? Are the use cases where a Killer NIC's benefits most likely to be realized commonplace enough to begin with and if they are, what sorts of difficulties make measurement so elusive? It's hard to accept the sales pitch if there's not a trustworthy third party out there that can show they actually exist.

    I understand why you'd like to consult with Rivet's personnel in the process of finding a way to measure and demonstrate what their hardware can do, but surely they already went through this trouble to get the numbers for their marketing materials that would put their product performance into bar graphs alongside other common network adapters. They've got to have invented that wheel already if they're claiming those benefits since false claims would expose the company to legal liability. It'd be odd that they're mum about it since their hardware appeals to a crowd of technically-inclined consumers that get very excited over a 2ms improvement in ping times to a game server.
  • nevcairiel - Tuesday, March 6, 2018 - link

    >If you are gaming, plus downloading, plus streaming, plus watching youtube on another monitor etc,
    > the priority thing does its job.

    I have my router doing proper QoS, I can download at full speed and not notice a dip in gaming. IMHO the "bottleneck" in the network needs to perform this task for good results, and thats often the gateway from ethernet to the internet.
  • Lolimaster - Tuesday, March 6, 2018 - link

    Downloading barely affects gaming sessions (game data downloaded from an online match is small), uploading beyond a certain threshold will kill it (climbing ms+).
  • andychow - Monday, March 5, 2018 - link

    I like the presence of U.2, but killer networking + RGB LEDS = no way I'm buying that. The RGB LEDs you can probably turn off, which just wastes a little money. But killer networking is really the deal breaker. It's something most people would pay extra to not have. Why do board makers ever accept using this brand?

    Even when killer hardware is based on Intel (these aren't), their custom firmware and drivers is just junk.

    Look online, most people that have the Killer 1535 just end up getting another wifi card.
  • Gothmoth - Monday, March 5, 2018 - link

    no word about the bios issues... anandtech articles are now basically just a feature list with more words.
  • Joe Shields - Wednesday, March 7, 2018 - link

    What BIOS issues? I did not run into any throughout testing. Perhaps the BIOS used fixed something from previous versions? Do you have a link to said problems?
  • timecop1818 - Monday, March 5, 2018 - link

    > What happens when a vendor adds 802.11ac to Killer networking?

    You lose sales.
    Fuck killer and fuck any vendor that uses their shit.
  • jjj - Monday, March 5, 2018 - link

    1 year later, AT still avoids Ryzen mobos with extreme ferocity.
    And it gets so much worse worse, you focus on X299, a platform almost nobody buys.
    Go count the mobo reviews in the last year. By my count , you got;
    12 reviews for X299
    6 reviews for for Z270
    2 reviews for for Z370

    2 reviews for X370
    1 review for TR

    Objectivity and serving the reader might not be this site's goal but even if your goal is to sell hardware, how is focusing on products that do not sell, serving your financial interests.
    The way this makes sense, is if someone is paying you to promote x299 at any cost. Otherwise, what you are doing is insanity.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now