Overclocking

Experience with the NZXT N7

Our overclocking adventures with the NZXT N7 in the end worked out well. I was able to achieve a clock speed of 5 GHz and was limited by temperature (due to the voltage - more on that in a bit). Though new, the NZXT N7 does have a performance option in the BIOS, however, it appears it didn't really do much. When flipping it over the core ratio raised from 43 to 46, but the individual cores for turbo did not change. I had expected to see it now boost all cores to 4.6 GHz when testing but it stayed the same at 4.3 GHz for POVRay and the Prime95 testing potentially suggesting an AVX offset is in play, but we do not have AVX offset settings to check.

The BIOS on the N7 offers the vast majority of overclocking options people need but is lacking a few others. The BIOS does not have the ability to set the Vcore with an offset or adaptive voltage and uses a static value. There are many of those who prefer an offset to save power while in idle or the CPU not ramping up all the way. Windows power plans can help, but inevitably some prefer that method which is not found in the BIOS. Also not found is Load Line Calibration to combat vdroop.

Our manual overclock was not without quirky behavior as well. Typically when one sets a manual voltage, we see very close to that voltage on load, give or take vdrop/vdroop. THe N7 though appears to have some kind of adaptive voltage going on behind the scenes as the voltage went up with the CPU multiplier. Setting the voltage at 1.2V with a multiplier of 43 had the voltage hit 1.25V. A 44x multiplier yielded 1.3V and 45x 1.35V and so on until it peaked at 1.4V - all the while manually set at 1.2V. What happens here it becomes more difficult to achieve an optimal overclock (using the least amount of voltage needed for a giving clock) which causes more power use and higher temperatures. Typically, these processors can reach 5 GHz around 1.3-1.35V and much less, nearly stock voltage around the 4.5 GHz mark. In this case, it would be using 0.25V more than needed at that clock speed and could potentially lop off a couple hundred MHz from the overclock without adjusting the voltage down. Another personality trait of this board a bit different than the rest is the reset button. When pressing it, the board fully powers down, then powers back up instead of a power 'blip' as we experience on most boards. 

In the end, the BIOS has the necessary options to overclock, but not all of the options we come to expect in a midrange motherboard. Overclocking is more of a brute force type of function here without a lot of fine tuning ability from within the BIOS. Where other boards are more refined and have worked out a lot of those kinks, we have to remember this is their first shot at it. You can easily overclock as we have seen below, but until the issue is fixed, you will be forced to use the CAM software and voltage offsets in order to reach an optimized overclock. With input, time, and subsequent BIOS releases, we imagine these options to show up and other improvements made to the board and BIOS mature. 

Overclocking Methodology

Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows. We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with POV-Ray and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads. These stability tests aim to catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.

For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from the previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed. The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (90ºC+). Our test bed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air.

Overclocking Results

The N7 took our i7-8700K to 5 GHz and was no worse for the wear after our brief stress testing (even at 1.4V). The CAM software nor the BIOS have sensors for the VRM, but they were warm to the touch after an extended stress test with OCCT. Our main issue with overclocking is the overvoltage situation. While there is a way around that, it shouldn't work in that way. Once it is resolved, the N7 is just as capable as any other board 

Gaming Performance Final Words and Conclusion
Comments Locked

60 Comments

View All Comments

  • temptemp - Thursday, January 11, 2018 - link

    WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU COMPARING DIFFERENT CPUs TO THE 8700K?!?!?!?!?

    Scientific method is you keep all except one variable constant.
    This is a motherboard comparison.... wow

    I throught this was a reputable site... wow lost my trust
  • Dug - Monday, January 15, 2018 - link

    That was explained if you actually read the article. You obviously aren't a reputable or trusted reader.
  • Kaihekoa - Saturday, January 13, 2018 - link

    The usual Anandtech quality reviews, but the comparisons to i9 platform MBs are completely useless.
  • justareader - Sunday, January 14, 2018 - link

    The I/O ports should be color coordinated as well.
  • thomasg - Monday, January 15, 2018 - link

    I can appreciate the no-nonsense looks, and I'm sure there's a (probably very small) market for it.
    But what the market is really missing is an actual no-nonsense board.

    I'd just love a simple and functional board with all the regular firmware options the high-end stuff has. No useless shrouds, no fancy lighting, no pointlessly oversized component coolers.
    Just a solid board with an usable design for proper airflow (i. e. no 20 cc passive blocks oriented at 90 and 180 degrees at the same time).

    For example something as Super Micro now does for Epyc workstations, just for the desktop platform: https://www.supermicro.nl/Aplus/motherboard/EPYC70...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now