Overclocking

Experience with the NZXT N7

Our overclocking adventures with the NZXT N7 in the end worked out well. I was able to achieve a clock speed of 5 GHz and was limited by temperature (due to the voltage - more on that in a bit). Though new, the NZXT N7 does have a performance option in the BIOS, however, it appears it didn't really do much. When flipping it over the core ratio raised from 43 to 46, but the individual cores for turbo did not change. I had expected to see it now boost all cores to 4.6 GHz when testing but it stayed the same at 4.3 GHz for POVRay and the Prime95 testing potentially suggesting an AVX offset is in play, but we do not have AVX offset settings to check.

The BIOS on the N7 offers the vast majority of overclocking options people need but is lacking a few others. The BIOS does not have the ability to set the Vcore with an offset or adaptive voltage and uses a static value. There are many of those who prefer an offset to save power while in idle or the CPU not ramping up all the way. Windows power plans can help, but inevitably some prefer that method which is not found in the BIOS. Also not found is Load Line Calibration to combat vdroop.

Our manual overclock was not without quirky behavior as well. Typically when one sets a manual voltage, we see very close to that voltage on load, give or take vdrop/vdroop. THe N7 though appears to have some kind of adaptive voltage going on behind the scenes as the voltage went up with the CPU multiplier. Setting the voltage at 1.2V with a multiplier of 43 had the voltage hit 1.25V. A 44x multiplier yielded 1.3V and 45x 1.35V and so on until it peaked at 1.4V - all the while manually set at 1.2V. What happens here it becomes more difficult to achieve an optimal overclock (using the least amount of voltage needed for a giving clock) which causes more power use and higher temperatures. Typically, these processors can reach 5 GHz around 1.3-1.35V and much less, nearly stock voltage around the 4.5 GHz mark. In this case, it would be using 0.25V more than needed at that clock speed and could potentially lop off a couple hundred MHz from the overclock without adjusting the voltage down. Another personality trait of this board a bit different than the rest is the reset button. When pressing it, the board fully powers down, then powers back up instead of a power 'blip' as we experience on most boards. 

In the end, the BIOS has the necessary options to overclock, but not all of the options we come to expect in a midrange motherboard. Overclocking is more of a brute force type of function here without a lot of fine tuning ability from within the BIOS. Where other boards are more refined and have worked out a lot of those kinks, we have to remember this is their first shot at it. You can easily overclock as we have seen below, but until the issue is fixed, you will be forced to use the CAM software and voltage offsets in order to reach an optimized overclock. With input, time, and subsequent BIOS releases, we imagine these options to show up and other improvements made to the board and BIOS mature. 

Overclocking Methodology

Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows. We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with POV-Ray and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads. These stability tests aim to catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.

For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from the previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed. The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (90ºC+). Our test bed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air.

Overclocking Results

The N7 took our i7-8700K to 5 GHz and was no worse for the wear after our brief stress testing (even at 1.4V). The CAM software nor the BIOS have sensors for the VRM, but they were warm to the touch after an extended stress test with OCCT. Our main issue with overclocking is the overvoltage situation. While there is a way around that, it shouldn't work in that way. Once it is resolved, the N7 is just as capable as any other board 

Gaming Performance Final Words and Conclusion
Comments Locked

60 Comments

View All Comments

  • Slash3 - Wednesday, January 10, 2018 - link

    Not trying to be that guy, but I honestly don't see a link or review page containing a gallery in the article!
  • artk2219 - Wednesday, January 10, 2018 - link

    Honestly I think it looks much better without the pointless shroud.
  • mariush - Wednesday, January 10, 2018 - link

    The board was made under contract by ECS ... not particularly a great OEM for motherboards... the board is more looks than performance anyway.
    For 300$ they could have made it an aluminum shield instead of steel.
  • yannigr2 - Wednesday, January 10, 2018 - link

    THE SPECS ARE WRONG

    USB 3.0 Chipset
    6 x (4 at back panel, 2 onboard headers)
    USB 2.0 Chipset
    8 x (4 at back panel, 4 onboard headers)

    8 USB 3.0( USB 3.1 Gen 1)(4+2+2 - 1 Header = two ports) and 11 USB 2.0(there are only 5 in the I/O panel and only 3 headers).
  • Joe Shields - Wednesday, January 10, 2018 - link

    Corrected. That is what I get for doing this in a much abbreviated time slot through the Holidays. :)
  • sonny73n - Wednesday, January 10, 2018 - link

    Case, MB and PSU makers seriously need to come together to redesign the whole thing to eliminate issues that we’ve been having for decades. Heavy CPU HSF still dangling on vertically mounted MB unless you go water. Cables management troublesome. Airflows from fans aren’t flowing in one direction. Still not dirt proof....

    I have solutions but my words probably will fall into deaf ears.
  • jabber - Saturday, January 13, 2018 - link

    I've said for a long time the internal connectors (especially power) in PCs all need a redesign. Most of them are either too big, too old or just not practical in the 21st century.
  • SanX - Wednesday, January 10, 2018 - link

    Smells like price fixing is at light speed in mobo business.
  • Hxx - Wednesday, January 10, 2018 - link

    OEM is ECS. not the best by any means. The price tag is way to high. the maximus code is $320 ,imo a much nicer looking board with many more features including a similar style with most of the pcb covered.
    I like that we get more options, but this just feels not well thought out by NZXT.
  • pjcamp - Wednesday, January 10, 2018 - link

    I see this as a nightmare to get dust bunnies out of.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now