Over the last week there's been increasing discussion and evidence of Apple's supposed introduction of CPU throttling mechanisms directly related to the battery wear level on Apple iPhones. The story started out with a report on Reddit of a user experiencing slow performance on an iPhone 6S and subsequent discovery that the performance restored to its full potential after a battery replacement.

Graph credit: John Poole, GeekBench 4 Blog

The report prompted GeekBench author John Poole to make use of the GeekBench benchmark submission database to plot performance of individual devices against iOS versions and discover a clear trend of ever increasing distribution towards lower performance points with newer OS versions.

Matthew Panzarino from TechCrunch was able to get an official statement from Apple when enquiring about the problem:

Our goal is to deliver the best experience for customers, which includes overall performance and prolonging the life of their devices. Lithium-ion batteries become less capable of supplying peak current demands when in cold conditions, have a low battery charge or as they age over time, which can result in the device unexpectedly shutting down to protect its electronic components.

Last year we released a feature for iPhone 6, iPhone 6s and iPhone SE to smooth out the instantaneous peaks only when needed to prevent the device from unexpectedly shutting down during these conditions. We’ve now extended that feature to iPhone 7 with iOS 11.2, and plan to add support for other products in the future.

Apple’s official statement sheds some light into the issue but comes short of an actual technical explanation of why the power management is failing. The company claims that the issue at heart is because of the battery degradation and its inability to supply sufficient current at a stable voltage.

Graph credit: Electronic Component News

Capacity and supply voltage of a battery decreases over time as a function of charge cycles and charging behaviour (Higher charging currents causing more degradation per cycle). This causes the total useable battery capacity before the cut-off voltage to decrease.

The problem facing the iPhones as Apple explains it is however two-fold; the issue at hand happens only during load spikes in which the battery isn’t able to maintain a high enough voltage for the PMIC to reliably be able to use as a source. 

Graph credit: Electronic Component News

SoC blocks such as CPUs and GPUs can have very short transitions from idle to load causing steep transients and load spikes going above the +10W ranges. As batteries degrade over time and the cell impedance also rises also in function of the state of charge and temperature, the current flow becomes restricted and the cell is no longer able to satisfy the power requirement at a high enough operating voltage.

Apple’s approach to the issue is to limit the peak power spikes by reducing the CPU frequencies over time as a function of battery wear. This solution however raises several questions; how does Apple decide the throttling behaviour and was the core fault an engineering fault or design choice?

As demonstrated in John Poole’s dataset Apple is throttling the CPU frequency in several stages. What exactly defines the thresholds to reach these stages can be either a rather simplistic counter taking into account the charge cycles of a given battery, or (and more hopefully) a more dynamic method that would be able to take advantage of the battery PMIC’s capabilities of determining battery wear. Given however that it seems that the OS is limiting performance even at high state of charges, such as fully charges batteries, it seems that the limitation implementation is unfortunately of the more simplistic type.

The second question comes to regard to as why it came to the issue in the first place as this should be a universal issue affecting a greater number of smartphones, not just Apple iPhones.

The first unique characteristic separating Apple iPhones from other smartphones is that Apple is using a custom CPU architecture that differs a lot from those of other vendors. It’s plausible that the architecture is able to power down and power up in a much more aggressive fashion compared to other designs and as such has stricter power regulation demands. If this is the case then another question rises is if this is indeed just a transient load issue why the power delivery system was not designed sufficiently robust enough to cope with such loads at more advanced levels of battery wear? While cold temperature and advanced battery wear are understandable conditions under which a device might not be able to sustain its normal operating conditions, the state of charge of a battery under otherwise normal conditions should be taken into account during the design of a device (Battery, SoC, PMIC, decoupling capacitors) and its operating tolerances.

If the assumptions above hold true then logically the issue would also be more prevalent in the smaller iPhone as opposed to the iPhone Plus models as the latter’s larger battery capacity would allow for greater discharge rates at a given stable voltage. This explanation might also be one of many factors as to why flagship Android and other devices don’t seem to exhibit this issue, as they come with much larger battery cells.

While much of the latter part of this piece is just my personal conjecture as to the deeper causes of the problem, it is clear that this is a larger issue for Apple that has no simple solution (beyond replacing the battery). How this affects more recent devices such as the iPhone 8 and iPhone X, or verifying if indeed the Plus variants would be less prone to the problem is something that will require a lot of testing, collaboration and data collection over longer periods of time.

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • diehardmacfan - Thursday, December 21, 2017 - link

    Well yeah it's hard to slow down a phone with updates if they stop updating it.
  • Total Meltdowner - Thursday, December 21, 2017 - link

    Apple and Samsung both do the planned obsolescence thing. Samgsun has had class action lawsuits filed (and samsung lost) for their tv capacitors failing right around when their warranty expires.

    Apple does it with software, they just bloat up the system, or in this case slow down the cpu.. in order to get the user to become frustrated and buy a new device.

    They should be sued over this. Apple should be sued.
  • rocky12345 - Thursday, December 21, 2017 - link

    I got two Samsung TV's one from 2011 a Plasma 43 inch which has been used for hundreds of hours so far & the other is from 2015 a LCD LED backlit 60 inch which has been used a lot as well without issues on either of them (Knock on wood).

    I do agree if these companies do this on purpose then they should be sued for their actions. Then again if Apple knew about this all the way back to the early iPhones then they should have fixed it a long long time ago and redesigned their phones in such a way that this would become less of a problem for the end users. BY just continuing to do the same thing is just pure bad form on their part at least Samsung fixed their problem in the TV's & moved past it. Apple being a multi billion dollar company has more than enough resources to design phones and other devices that would not have these issues. It may be time for them to invest more money into their designs or fire their design team and hire new people better yet stop using Foxxconn as their go to company to put these devices together.
  • FunBunny2 - Thursday, December 21, 2017 - link

    "Apple and Samsung both do the planned obsolescence thing. "

    which was invented, in modern-ish history, by American car companies in the 1950s. not a new thing.
  • asmian - Thursday, December 21, 2017 - link

    Actually, it's way older than that. I'm sure I saw a documentary that explained about one of the oldest cartels discovered being the one that carved up the early lightbulb industry around the turn of the 20th Century, where all the manufacturers, US and German mostly, colluded to ensure that the bulbs didn't last too long and no-one broke ranks with any longer-lasting product. That really was the start of modern international corporatism (as opposed to simple capitalism).
  • FunBunny2 - Sunday, December 24, 2017 - link

    "Actually, it's way older than that."

    here: https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-history/dawn-of-ele...
  • praktik - Thursday, December 21, 2017 - link

    It could be that it's a universal issue, but Apple's cure is worse than the disease, and symptoms related to the battery wear aren't that noticeable to end users.
  • jimc092 - Thursday, December 21, 2017 - link

    What isn't stated in the article is what counts as a charge discharge cycle.
    It would be useful if figures were given for
    1: Full charge till phone shuts down. Then full recharge.
    2: Full charge till 75% of battery used. Then full recharge.
    3: Full charge till 50% of battery used. Then full recharge.
    2: Full charge till 25% of battery used. Then full recharge.

    My phone is almost always on charge, at my desk, at home and work, and in my car.
    I doubt that my usage counts as 3 recharges per day.
  • HStewart - Thursday, December 21, 2017 - link

    What Apple needs to have a way to reduce notifications and such. But lets be fair, this is not just Apple (IE Windows Android ... )
  • Dgh - Thursday, December 21, 2017 - link

    Why does this have to do with an APPLE hardware issue ... see below ... found on US samsung support with totaly different hardware ... SAME ISSUE. Think its more a genral lithium ion issue


    04-21-2017 03:33 AM
    Re: S7 Edge battery drain

    My battery has been getting progressively worse over the past few months and now just drains and switches off when the battery gets to 35% or so - it is then completely drained. 0%. (I had just checked battery prior to this happening and it said 4.5hrs left)

    Can you help. Is my battery faulty? Phone is only 8 months old.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now