Battery Life

Battery life is something that everyone needs, but is also one of the hardest aspects of a laptop to measure since everyone has different tasks they want to perform. To get consistent results, all devices are set to 200 nits of brightness prior to the test being run. All devices are tested with Edge as the browser.

We have three tests that we are utilizing in our test suite right now. The 2013 Light test is our older web browser test, which is the lightest test, and it opens four web pages per minute. It’s reached a point where it's a bit too light for most devices, but it’s also the one with the most backlog of results to compare against, so it’s nice to test it still. The 2016 Web test is a much more demanding web test, which is the same one we use on our mobile devices. Finally, we test video playback from a local h.264 video file.

The ASUS Zenbook is equipped with just a 46 Wh battery, which is about the same size as the Surface Pro, and on the small size for an Ultrabook. A new XPS 13, for example, is a relatively massive 60 Wh, so expectations are tempered going into our testing.

2013 Light Results

Battery Life 2013 - Light

On our 2013 test, the ZenBook 3 did very well. 11.25 hours of battery life out of just 46 Wh is well above expectations. It can’t quite match the FHD version of the Dell XPS 13 we tested (this is the original Broadwell version – Dell will be sending us the latest gen one soon for a more up-to-date result), but it’s still a great result for having a below average capacity battery in an Ultrabook.

2016 Web Results

Battery Life 2016 - Web

The more demanding web browsing test does knock some time off the result, but the ZenBook 3 is the longest lasting device we’ve tested with this version of the benchmark. It’s a very impressive result.

Normalized Results

Battery Life 2013 - Light Normalized

Battery Life 2016 - Web - Normalized

By removing the battery capacity from the equation, we can see how efficient each device is. Here the lower resolution display helps out a lot, but overall, ASUS has done a great job on power management. The ZenBook 3 is one of the most efficient laptops we’ve seen.

Movie Playback

Battery Life Movie Playback

Battery Life Tesseract

Movie playback is not quite as impressive as the Surface Pro, but still quite strong.

Charge Time

The other side of the mobility equation is charge time. ASUS ships the ZenBook 3 with a 65-Watt USB-C AC Adapter. The wattage of this charger is quite a bit higher than most other Ultrabooks, where 40-Watts or so is much more common. Also, ASUS has added upstream charging to all three of the USB-C ports on the notebook, so you can charge it on whichever one is the most convenient. Not all companies do this, so ASUS needs to be commended here.

Battery Charge Time

The ZenBook 3 charges from dead to full in just a hair over two hours, which is one of the quickest we’ve seen. Looking at the charge graph, it hits 50% charge in just 43 minutes, so the larger charger does help on the quick fill-up.

Display Analysis Wireless, Speakers, WebCam, and Thermals
Comments Locked

55 Comments

View All Comments

  • Krysto - Wednesday, November 22, 2017 - link

    Came here to say this. Intel's "ultra-mobile" chips are too weak. I'd rather get a quad-core AMD chip for the price.
  • StevoLincolnite - Thursday, November 23, 2017 - link

    My major gripe is the Intel Decelerator Graphics.
    For christ sake, at-least let me play MOBA's like Overwatch, we are almost in 2018!
  • Ratman6161 - Sunday, November 26, 2017 - link

    Ultra mobile "U" CPU's are not aimed at or intended for that usage. This, or any other U CPU and this entire form factor probably aren't for you.
  • MrSpadge - Thursday, November 23, 2017 - link

    Feel free to vote with your wallet :)
  • HStewart - Wednesday, November 22, 2017 - link

    Now we can see one of reasons why Intel hire Raju.

    Keep in mine Cinebench is heavy Video intensive by nature.
  • Brazos - Wednesday, November 22, 2017 - link

    Intel should hire someone from AMD to help make their graphic chips competitive. :)
  • mooninite - Wednesday, November 22, 2017 - link

    I don't get it. ASUS hasn't released an equivalent to the UX301LA. Why are they not releasing an Iris-level graphics CPU? Didn't sell well?
  • wolrah - Wednesday, November 22, 2017 - link

    This is getting pretty close to the laptop I've wanted for years but no one made.

    * Quad Core
    * Thunderbolt 3
    * No dGPU
    * Backlit keyboard (why there are any laptops without this in 2017 I don't know)

    but it unfortunately fails two big requirements for me:

    * Standard ethernet port, no flappy spring loaded designs and no Killer anything.
    * Upgradeable RAM

    I'd really like to see something slightly thicker and heavier which put that thickness towards an Intel or Aquantia NIC, socketed everything, and then filled the rest of the available space with battery.
  • labrats5 - Wednesday, November 22, 2017 - link

    The current intel chips don't support more than 16gb of lpddr3 ram. Even if it were user replaceable, there would be nothing to upgrade to.
  • Jimios - Wednesday, November 22, 2017 - link

    They do support 32GB of standard DDR4 though, and the manufacturers could offer this with the obvious trade-off in battery life.

    Having said that, why someone would really need 32GB of RAM in an ultrabook is beyond me. For heavier workflows, there are larger laptops available, and of course desktops. Can't have everything in life.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now