The ASUS TUF X299 Mark I Motherboard Review: TUF Refined
by Joe Shields on December 6, 2017 9:30 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
- Asus
- TUF
- X299
- Skylake-X
- Kaby Lake-X
Benchmark Overview
For our testing, depending on the product, we attempt to tailor the presentation of our global benchmark suite down into what users who would buy this hardware might actually want to run. For CPUs, our full test suite is typically used to gather data and all the results are placed into Bench, our benchmark database for users that want to look at non-typical benchmarks or legacy data. For motherboards, we run our short form CPU tests, the gaming tests with half the GPUs of our processor suite, and our system benchmark tests which focus on non-typical and non-obvious performance metrics that are the focal point for specific groups of users.
The benchmarks fall into several areas:
Short Form CPU
Our short form testing script uses a straight run through of a mixture of known apps or workloads and requires about four hours. These are typically the CPU tests we run in our motherboard suite, to identify any performance anomalies.
| CPU Short Form Benchmarks | |
| Three Dimensional Particle Movement v2.1 (3DPM) | 3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, derived from my academic research years looking at particle movement parallelism. The coding for this tool was rough, but emulates the real world in being non-CompSci trained code for a scientific endeavor. The code is unoptimized, but the test uses OpenMP to move particles around a field using one of six 3D movement algorithms in turn, each of which is found in the academic literature. |
| The second version of this benchmark is similar to the first, however it has been re-written in VS2012 with one major difference: the code has been written to address the issue of false sharing. If data required by multiple threads, say four, is in the same cache line, the software cannot read the cache line once and split the data to each thread - instead it will read four times in a serial fashion. The new software splits the data to new cache lines so reads can be parallelized and stalls minimized. | |
| WinRAR 5.4 | WinRAR is a compression based software to reduce file size at the expense of CPU cycles. We use the version that has been a stable part of our benchmark database through 2015, and run the default settings on a 1.52GB directory containing over 2800 files representing a small website with around thirty half-minute videos. We take the average of several runs in this instance. |
| POV-Ray 3.7.1 b4 | POV-Ray is a common ray-tracing tool used to generate realistic looking scenes. We've used POV-Ray in its various guises over the years as a good benchmark for performance, as well as a tool on the march to ray-tracing limited immersive environments. We use the built-in multi threaded benchmark. |
| HandBrake v1.0.2 | HandBrake is a freeware video conversion tool. We use the tool in to process two different videos into x264 in an MP4 container - first a 'low quality' two-hour video at 640x388 resolution to x264, then a 'high quality' ten-minute video at 4320x3840, and finally the second video again but into HEVC. The low-quality video scales at lower performance hardware, whereas the buffers required for high-quality tests can stretch even the biggest processors. At current, this is a CPU only test. |
| 7-Zip 9.2 | 7-Zip is a freeware compression/decompression tool that is widely deployed across the world. We run the included benchmark tool using a 50MB library and take the average of a set of fixed-time results. |
| DigiCortex v1.20 | The newest benchmark in our suite is DigiCortex, a simulation of biologically plausible neural network circuits, and simulates activity of neurons and synapses. DigiCortex relies heavily on a mix of DRAM speed and computational throughput, indicating that systems which apply memory profiles properly should benefit and those that play fast and loose with overclocking settings might get some extra speed up. |
System Benchmarks
Our system benchmarks are designed to probe motherboard controller performance, particularly any additional USB controllers or the audio controller. As general platform tests we have DPC Latency measurements and system boot time, which can be difficult to optimize for on the board design and manufacturing level.
| System Benchmarks | |
| Power Consumption | One of the primary differences between different motherboads is power consumption. Aside from the base defaults that every motherboard needs, things like power delivery, controller choice, routing and firmware can all contribute to how much power a system can draw. This increases for features such as PLX chips and multi-gigabit ethernet. |
| Non-UEFI POST Time | The POST sequence of the motherboard becomes before loading the OS, and involves pre-testing of onboard controllers, the CPU, the DRAM and everything else to ensure base stability. The number of controllers, as well as firmware optimizations, affect the POST time a lot. We test the BIOS defaults as well as attempt a stripped POST. |
| Rightmark Audio Analyzer 6.2.5 | Testing onboard audio is difficult, especially with the numerous amount of post-processing packages now being bundled with hardware. Nonetheless, manufacturers put time and effort into offering a 'cleaner' sound that is loud and of a high quality. RMAA, with version 6.2.5 (newer versions have issues), under the right settings can be used to test the signal-to-noise ratio, signal crossover, and harmonic distortion with noise. |
| USB Backup | USB ports can come from a variety of sources: chipsets, controllers or hubs. More often than not, the design of the traces can lead to direct impacts on USB performance as well as firmware level choices relating to signal integrity on the motherboard. |
| DPC Latency | Another element is deferred procedure call latency, or the ability to handle interrupt servicing. Depending on the motherboard firmware and controller selection, some motherboards handle these interrupts quicker than others. A poor result could lead to delays in performance, or for example with audio, a delayed request can manifest in distinct audible pauses, pops or clicks. |
Gaming
Our gaming benchmarks are designed to show any differences in performance when playing games.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
15 Comments
View All Comments
Sn3akr - Thursday, December 7, 2017 - link
Are there ever gonna be a motherboard with clean lines and less appeal to 13-year old kids? 99.99% of the manufacturers all do black/red/gray colour, jagged edges and a missmash of edgy design feeatures. Guess i'll have to invest in a lazercutter to get clean lines and smooth design before i grow old and die. CLosest thing i've ever seen was ASUS Z97 SaberTooth Mark S, but then they went back to the teen tech.You can get some really nice cases, but if you try to match the hardware in one color other than black/red or black grey, then your in for a modding session. Currently making a white/purple build, but for some bizarre reason asus thinks all their "white boards" just needs a few blue details, and for the higher end cards.. then black/red or black/grey seems to be almost the only option, and has been for almost 10 years
sonny73n - Thursday, December 7, 2017 - link
It's just Asus with their dumb marketing gimmicks again. IMO their boards are the best but they're the worst values for the money. I'd go with ASRock instead.xray9 - Sunday, December 10, 2017 - link
Look to Supermicro server and workstation boards.I invested 3y ago into an X10SRi-F with E5-1650v3 or v4 .. works like a charm.
And even today it scales very nicely
- it has many PCIe 3.0 sockets with reasonable amount of PCIe lanes and some PCIe2.0
- if you compare the ratio of passmark performance divided by price, then you will see, that it the ratio is about the same compared to threadripper and Intel CPUs .. Which means you do not pay €1000 for threadripper which is quite expensive, you pay around €600 but get the same performance / price ratio
- you have with socket 2011-3 quad memory speed and ECC if you compare with Intel ...
- IPMI ...
Completely true enterprise segment products to a reasonable price.
So even 3y later absolutely compareable and expandable by PCI sockets with USB 3.1, further USB 3.0 or 10 Gigabit adapters if you require, PCIe based NVME ... all is possible.
super gaming - Thursday, December 14, 2017 - link
mother board asus tuf x2 does have amazing performance
<a href="http://gadgeton3.blogspot.com/2017/11/spesifikasi-...
lenovo super gaming laptop with cheap price</a>
tompreston301 - Monday, January 1, 2018 - link
thanks so much for the articles. I really like it. This is really awesome for those who want something awesome and good as you know.https://www.imobetachat.com/snapchat-for-pc-window...