CPU Performance, Short Form

For our motherboard reviews, we use our short form testing method. These tests usually focus on if a motherboard is using MultiCore Turbo (the feature used to have maximum turbo on at all times, giving a frequency advantage), or if there are slight gains to be had from tweaking the firmware. We put the memory settings at the CPU manufacturers suggested frequency, making it very easy to see which motherboards have MCT enabled by default.

Video Conversion – Handbrake v1.0.2: link

Handbrake is a media conversion tool that was initially designed to help DVD ISOs and Video CDs into more common video formats. For HandBrake, we take two videos and convert them to x264 format in an MP4 container: a 2h20 640x266 DVD rip and a 10min double UHD 3840x4320 animation short. We also take the third video and transcode it to HEVC. Results are given in terms of the frames per second processed, and HandBrake uses as many threads as possible.

Handbrake v0.9.9 H.264: LQHandbrake v0.9.9 H.264: HQHandbrake v0.9.9 H.264: 4K60

Compression – WinRAR 5.4: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2017. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second 720p videos.

WinRAR 5.0.1 Compression Test

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test v2.1: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here. We are using the latest version of 3DPM, which has a significant number of tweaks over the original version to avoid issues with cache management and speeding up some of the algorithms.

3DPM: Movement Algorithm Tester (Multi-threaded)

Rendering – POV-Ray 3.7.1b4: link

The Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer, or POV-Ray, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 2-3 minutes on high end platforms.

POV-Ray @ 3.9GHz

Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link

As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.

7-Zip 9.2 Compress/Decompress Benchmark

System Performance Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

46 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ket_MANIAC - Tuesday, March 13, 2018 - link

    Only 3 AM4 motherboard reviews in over a year?
  • evancox10 - Wednesday, March 14, 2018 - link

    s/compliment/complement/

    If something is free, it is complimentary. If two or more things combine together well, they are complementary.
  • Daisy81 - Saturday, August 11, 2018 - link

    I currently have Ryzen 5 1660, MSI B350 Tomahawk and a 16GB kit of PNY Anarchy DDR4-2400 RAM (2x8). These three pieces I got for $480 with tax about a month ago. I wasn't expecting much but it out of the box was way faster then my antiquated Asus P5Q-E, Core 2 Quad Q9650 and 8GB DDR2,

    Anyways I am very impressed with all of these pieces as a whole. The memory runs at DDR4-3066 speeds on this motherboard. The CPU is solid as a rock at 4GHz on this motherboard. In fact on this motherboard pushing the clock speed to 4.05GHz for benching (using the stock cooler that came with the processor no less) my Ryzen 5 1600 on the B350 Tomahawk beat my Core i7 5930K on a MSI X99A SLI Plus in the CPU department. This blows me away because these three components cost me on par for what I purchased my 5930K new at Microcenter for.

    A link for the 3D Mark Timespy results results
    https://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/4202900/spy/100...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now