Conclusion

A Board for Casual X299 Gamers? Is That a Thing?

MSI intended the Arsenal line of motherboards for the casual gaming crowd; for users who might not spend as much time or money on gaming. The casual gamer might not to take things as serious as a hardcore or competitive gamer, or use gaming to relax or socialize, rather than to develop l33t skillz or further a professional reputation. The X299 platform, with the addition of Kaby Lake-X support and the blurring of the lines between the mainstream and HEDT platforms, it is now possible to have a drop-in upgrade path for the CPU. Instead of buying a $400+ CPU to get into the platform, the 7740K and 7640X sell for around $350 and $250 and offer 4C/8T and 4C/4T respectively, allowing for a cheaper entry into a higher-end platform. This is not without some sacrifices, however. PCIe lane count doesn't change on the Kaby Lake X processors so some functionality, such as SLI/Crossfire support, can be limited, especially when using other devices, such as PCIe 3.0 x4 M.2 modules. Outside of the MSI Pro line, intended for business use, the Tomahawk boards will be one of the least expensive way into X299 through MSI's doors.

Though they may be the least expensive entry in the Gaming realm, MSI uses a selection of common but proven controllers to add functionality to the board. USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) duties are handled by the ASMedia 3142 controller. This controller uses less power and offers better performance than the previous 2142 controller found on many Z270 boards. The single wired LAN controller is the I219-V, also a proven performer and offers ESD protection as well as traffic management to prioritize streams for optimal performance in online gaming. Control of the power phases is managed by a well regarded International Rectifier IR35201 8-channel controller to ensure accurate voltage is delivered to the processor.

Build quality on the Tomahawk was quite solid. The heatsinks, aesthetically pleasing, were mounted tight and made good contact with the 8 phase VRM keeping it running well within specifications throughout our testing, even during overclocking. The oversized chipset and M.2 heatsink also worked well. The main concern with the board's looks is the white color. Overall, I do like the white color as it is different than most which are black and loaded with RGB LEDs and it would look beautiful in an all white build. But it can be polarizing. Because nearly every other part is black, the board looks quite busy. If it doesn't have the look, the black Tomahawk is always an option.

Performance on the Arctic was mostly similar to the other X299 boards we have tested so far, scoring a win in DPC Latency by a small margin. MSI likes to equip its boards with some minor overclocking features by default, so anyone running the system at its standard frequencies will see a benchmark boost in some tests at the expense of another 30W of power or so. It is worth noting that some other manufacturers do not have these minor overclocking features enabled by default, in an effort to prolong the potential lifetime of the hardware, especially in very warm ambient environments.

Overall, the MSI X299 Tomahawk Arctic is going to have most, if not all of the features a casual gamer needs to get up and fragging or questing. A high-end audio codec, modern connectivity with USB 3.1 10 Gbps Type-A and Type-C, multi-GPU support, and multiple M.2 drives are all a casual gamer/user might need. The price point is fair when looking at the similarly priced boards. The difference is going to be in the fine details as to which board to choose in the heavily populated $250-$300 price range. I'd like to see the price a bit lower, around the $260 mark to make it a more attractive purchase for the money.

The MSI X299 Tomahawk Arctic is priced at $279 at Newegg. This places the board right around the likes of the ASUS Prime X299-A ($269), and a GIGABYTE X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming ($309). Within the MSI line, the all-black Tomahawk AC, with added Wi-Fi, is priced at $289 while the non-arctic Tomahawk is $269.

Other AnandTech X299 Motherboard Reviews 

Prices checked 11/20

Overclocking with the Core i9-7900X
Comments Locked

21 Comments

View All Comments

  • blppt - Tuesday, November 21, 2017 - link

    Believe it or not, I've had exactly zero issues with my ASRock Taichi X399---was kinda concerned about trusting a "budget brand" but after seeing all the issues with the MSI/ASUS/GB boards, I decided to give them a try.

    I do NOT use custom fan profiles though---cant tell you if those work or not.
  • PeachNCream - Monday, November 20, 2017 - link

    While the motherboard's price and features seem reasonable, the terminology used to describe the target audience seems weird to me. When I think of casual gaming, playing things like Candy Crush Saga or spending time on Pogo.com both come to mind. Maybe there's a few inexpensive titles or some occasional 3D stuff, but certainly nothing that needs a 6+ core CPU or even much more than a low end dGPU.
  • inighthawki - Monday, November 20, 2017 - link

    "Casual" in the realm of PC gaming pretty much refers to anything short of playing competitively or professional, which can essentially refer to anyone who just wants really high performance.
  • PeachNCream - Monday, November 20, 2017 - link

    That's a much broader use of the term than I've seen anywhere else. It's not like "casual gamer" has a formal definition someplace so you can get away with using it like that, but you and MSI are the only ones I know of that have done it. I think from MSI's view, its mostly wishful thinking to get people playing Farmville to buy a $280 motherboard and a Skylake-X CPU for it. I'm sure they'd like that and their marketing people are trying to encourage more casual types to move up the product stacks, but most of us causal types are playing games on our phones and tablets or on a very low-end notebook PC rather than a desktop put together from individual parts.
  • Intervenator - Monday, November 20, 2017 - link

    I appreciate how this board is the most aesthetically pleasing white board I have ever seen on the market, and one of the nicest looking boards of all colors and designs I have seen in a long time.
  • nevcairiel - Tuesday, November 21, 2017 - link

    The X299 Tomahawk has a particularly bad VRM implementation, so that should probably be noted somewhere. It has some VRM components on the back of the board with only a tiny heatspreader on them (and only a 4x2 design). The X299 Gaming Pro Carbon in comparison comes with a 6x2 power design using better components - and even those need to get cooled on high OCs.

    From the feature set alone, the Tomahawk looked like a board I might've bought, but alas the subpar VRM limiting the OC potential had turned me off of those quite fast.
  • Joe Shields - Tuesday, November 21, 2017 - link

    It was mentioned below the specifications table that it wasn't 'great'. However, it handled all of our testing and overclocking just fine. You will likely run out of cooling first before there is a worry about the VRMs here. Also consider the board is marketed for the professional, so there really isn't a need in the first place considering the vast majority using the board will likely keep it at stock or mild clocks anyway.
  • Joe Shields - Tuesday, November 21, 2017 - link

    Apologies, that is the SLI Plus marketed towards the professional. Scratch that portion of the above post. :)
  • notR1CH - Tuesday, November 21, 2017 - link

    What's this?! An MSI motherboard without an integrated Killer NIC? I hope they've finally realized gamers aren't interested in sub-par Killer products and this trend continues.
  • gammaray - Wednesday, November 22, 2017 - link

    Why you say Killer NIC is sub par?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now